Klaxon Company v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Company, 313 U.S. 487 (1941), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court applied the choice-of-law principles of Erie Railroad v. Tompkins to conflicts between laws of different states for cases sitting in federal court on diversity jurisdiction. The court held that a federal court sitting in diversity must apply the choice-of-law doctrine of the forum state to choose between the forum state's law and the other state's law (as distinguished from the federal choice-of-law doctrines which had been used before Erie).[1]
Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., Inc. | |
---|---|
Argued May 1–2, 1941 Decided June 2, 1941 | |
Full case name | Klaxon Company v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc. |
Citations | 313 U.S. 487 (more) |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Reed, joined by unanimous |
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Yeazell, S.C. Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 231
External links
edit- Text of Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., 313 U.S. 487 (1941) is available from: Justia Library of Congress