Acanthostomatops is an extinct genus of zatracheidid temnospondyl from the Lower Permian Döhlen Basin of Saxony.
| Acanthostomatops Temporal range: Early Permian
~ | |
|---|---|
| |
| Restoration of Acanthostomatops vorax | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Order: | †Temnospondyli |
| Family: | †Zatracheidae |
| Genus: | †Acanthostomatops Kuhn, 1961 |
| Type species | |
| †Acanthostoma vorax Credner, 1883
| |
| Synonyms | |
|
Melanerpeton spiniceps | |
History of study
editAcanthostomatops was originally named as the type species Acanthostoma vorax, in 1883.[1] However, the genus name Acanthostoma was previously used for a polychaete worm back in 1813, and the present name was given in 1961.[2] Detailed descriptions of the taxon were given by Steen & Brough (1937),[3] with an emphasis on the ontogeny of the taxon based on the large sample size given by Boy (1989)[4] and Witzmann & Schoch (2006).[5] Werneburg (1998) described a larval specimen of A. vorax,[6] but this was later proven to be a specimen of the micromelerpetid Branchierpeton amblystomum.[5]
Anatomy
editAcanthostomatops is diagnosed by six features: (1) lacrimal and prefrontal projecting into orbital; (2) quadratojugal with two lateral spikes; (3) choana laterally constricted by palatal tusk sockets; (4) small, rectangular interclavicle; (5) large and robust humerus present in larval stages; (6) 21-22 presacral vertebrae positions.[7] Compared to the other zatracheidids, it has the proportionately widest skull and the smallest internarial fontanelle, which only slightly divides the nasals. it also lacks posteriorly extensive tabular horns and postparietal horns. It is also the only zatracheidid with definitively known postcranial material.
Development
editOver 30 specimens of A. vorax are known from the type locality near Dresden. The ontogenetic changes have been described in detail most recently by Witzmann & Schoch (2006). Among the changes that occur are a proportional shortening of the femur and the trunk relative to the skull and a distinct remodeling of the hyobranchial apparatus, with resorption of the larval form's ceratobranchials and the formation of a complex apparatus of hypobranchials that the authors suggested was for supporting the tongue. Based on the changes to the skeleton and the distribution of size classes within the locality, Witzmann & Schoch (2006) suggested that A. vorax had a biphasic life history, with an aquatic larval to juvenile form and a terrestrial adult form.
References
edit- ^ Credner, C. Hermann (1883). "Die Stegocephalen aus dem Rothliegenden des Plauen'schen Grundes bei Dresden. 4. Theil". Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft. 34: 275–300.
- ^ Kuhn, Oskar (1961). Die Familien der rezenten und fossilen Amphibien und Reptilien. Bamberg: Meisenbach. pp. 1–79.
- ^ Steen, Margaret C.; Brough, Mrs. James (September 1937). "On Acanthostoma vorax Credner". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. B107 (3): 491–500. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1937.tb00020.x.
- ^ Boy, Jürgen A. (1989). "Über einige Vertreter der Eryopoidea (Amphibia: Temnospondyli) aus dem europäischen Rotliegend (?höchstes Oberkarbon — Perm)2. Acanthostomatops". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 63 (1–2): 133–151. doi:10.1007/bf02989530. ISSN 0031-0220.
- ^ a b Witzmann, F.; Schoch, R. R. (2006). "Skeletal development of the temnospondyl Acanthostomatops vorax from the Lower Permian Döhlen Basin of Saxony". Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences. 96 (4): 365–385. doi:10.1017/S0263593300001358.
- ^ Werneburg, Ralf (1998). "Ein larvaler Acanthostomatops (Zatrachydidae, Amphibia) aus der Niederhäslich-Formation (Unter-Perm) des Döhlen-Beckens". Veröffentlichungen des Museums für Naturkunde Chemnitz. 21: 49–52.
- ^ Schoch, Rainer R.; Milner, Andrew R. (2014). Sues, Hans-Dieter (ed.). Handbuch der Palaeoherpetologie. Munchen: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.