Beecher v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 35 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that eliciting a confession from a suspect while he was under the influence of morphine and recovering from a gunshot wound violated the Due Process Clause.[1][2]

Beecher v. Alabama
Decided October 23, 1967
Full case nameBeecher v. Alabama
Citations389 U.S. 35 (more)
Holding
Eliciting a confession from a suspect while he was under the influence of morphine and recovering from a gunshot wound violated the Due Process Clause.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Abe Fortas · Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
Per curiam
ConcurrenceBlack
ConcurrenceBrennan, joined by Warren, Douglas

Description

edit

Although the decision was unanimous and unsigned, the four concurring justices disagreed with describing this as a violation of the Due Process Clause. The four would have described it as a violation of the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination protections, which had recently been incorporated against the states in Malloy v. Hogan.[2]

References

edit
  1. ^ Beecher v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 35 (1967)
  2. ^ a b Stephens, Jr., Otis H. (1973). The Supreme Court and Confessions of Guilt. pp. 149–150.
edit