Wikipedia

Abnormal behaviour of birds in captivity

(Redirected from Bird safe)

Abnormal behavior of birds in captivity has been found to occur among both domesticated and wild birds.[1] Abnormal behavior can be defined in several ways. Statistically, 'abnormal' is when the occurrence, frequency or intensity of a behaviour varies statistically significantly, either more or less, from the normal value.[2] This means that theoretically, almost any behaviour could become 'abnormal' in an individual. Less formally, 'abnormal' includes any activity judged to be outside the normal behaviour pattern for captive birds of that particular class or age.[3] For example, running rather than flying may be a normal behaviour and regularly observed in one species, however, in another species it might be normal but becomes 'abnormal' if it reaches a high frequency, or in another species it is rarely observed and any incidence is considered 'abnormal'. This article does not include 'one-off' behaviours performed by individual birds that might be considered abnormal for that individual, unless these are performed repeatedly by other individuals in the species and are recognised as part of the ethogram of that species.

A pet grey parrot displaying signs of extensive feather-plucking.

Most abnormal behaviours can be categorised collectively (e.g., eliminative, ingestive, stereotypies), however, many abnormal behaviours fall debatably into several of these categories and categorisation is therefore not attempted in this article. Abnormal behaviours here are considered to be related to captive housing but may also be due to medical conditions. The article does not include behaviours in birds that are genetically modified to express abnormal behaviour.

Behaviors

edit

When housed under captive or commercial conditions, birds often show a range of abnormal behaviours. These are often self-injurious or harmful to other individuals, and can include feather and toe pecking, cannibalism, stereotypy, vent pecking, as well as abnormal sexual behaviours such as chronic egg laying.

Feather and toe pecking

edit
Main article: toe pecking

Feather pecking is an abnormal behaviour observed in birds in captivity (primarily in laying hens)[4] whereby one bird repeatedly pecks the feathers of another. Toe pecking is a similar occurrence in commercialized hens which includes repeatedly pecking the toes of another. Each of these behaviours have been tied to physiological stress (i.e., extremely enlarged adrenal glands) likely caused by housing conditions in captivity.[5][6][7]

Cannibalism

edit
See also: Cannibalism in poultry

Cannibalism in birds of captivity is a behaviour often linked to feather pecking. With increasing frequency and intensity of feather pecking, the risk and prevalence of cannibalism increases.[4] Since feather pecking leads to increased food consumption due to heat loss through the skin of the bird, and feather pecking is an already aggressive behaviour that consists of cannibalistic qualities, cannibalism is a common consequential effect. Cannibalism is defined as the act of consuming all or part of another individual of the same species as food.[4][8][9][10]

Stereotypy

edit
See also: Stereotypy (non-human)

Stereotypies are invariant, repetitive behaviour patterns with no blatant function or objective, and seem to be restricted to captive and/or mentally-impaired animals.[11] Stereotypies are the result of inability of an animal to perform a normal behaviour due to external environmental conditions or circumstance. A common stereotypy in laying hens is pacing which involves the animal constantly walking back and forth in a seemingly ritualistic manner due to no access to a suitable nest site.[11] The pacing stereotypy is also hypothesized to arise from intentional movements of escape, specifically in captive animals such as birds. The overabundance as well as lack of stimulation associated with the sub-optimal environment of captivity are the common factors amongst development of stereotypy behaviours in birds.[11]

Vent pecking

edit
Main article: Vent pecking

Vent pecking is an abnormal behaviour observed in birds in captivity that involves pecking and causing damage to the cloaca, its surrounding skin, and underlying tissue of another bird. Occurrence of vent pecking is primarily immediately after a bird has oviposited when the cloaca is red and enlarged.[12] Vent pecking, like feather pecking, is a gateway behaviour to cannibalism due to its cannibalistic features of hostility towards another individual that involves the aggressive tearing and damaging of the skin and tissue. Vent cannibalism was found to be the most common type of cannibalism causing death in autopsy results of laying hens.[13][14][15]

Additional behaviors

edit

Causes

edit

When analyzing the behaviour of birds in captivity, what is considered normal or abnormal behaviour is dependent on the form and frequency that the particular behaviour is expressed in the natural environment.[33] Birds raised in pet stores tend to be raised with other birds, however, after being sold and taken to the owner's home, birds in captivity are often housed in isolation and in environments lacking abundant resources or complex stimuli. In the United States, it is estimated that forty million birds are kept caged and improperly cared for.[34] Because of these inappropriate housing conditions, abnormal behaviour patterns may appear in caged birds kept as pets. Once established, these abnormal behaviours in birds are often not alterable.[35]

When social interactions amongst birds are absent or inadequate, abnormal social behaviour may develop. For example, a study regarding parrots that had been isolated in cages demonstrated that most birds showing this social deprivation had significant behavioural disturbances, such as aggressive behaviour, feather picking, self-mutilation, restlessness, screaming, apathetic behavior, and stereotypies.[36] Several parrots living in captivity monitored during a study have displayed behaviors  consisting of screaming excessively and biting. This specific noise made by these birds is encouraged in captivity. Biting however is not a typical defense mechanism used by wild parrots.[32] Cannibalism often occurs in large animal husbandry systems, which are usually impoverished environments with a lack of opportunities.[37] In addition, studies of caged canaries have revealed two common stereotypies.[21] These include spot picking, where birds repeatedly touch a particular spot in the environment with the tip of their beak, and route tracing, a pacing behaviour associated with physical restrictions in movement imposed by the cage. The absence of song learning in zebra finches has also been implicated as a behavioural abnormality.[38] In these birds, the social interaction of a young male with his song tutor is important for normal song development. Without the stimulus, the song, which is necessary for mating behavior, will not be learned.

Researchers have analyzed ways to alleviate some abnormal behaviours in caged birds. Presenting these birds with novel stimuli e.g. a mirror or plastic birds, and social stimuli, such as a brief view of a bird in another cage, significantly reduced stereotypies.[39] In addition, it has been suggested that keeping caged birds in pairs or small groups may reduce the development of abnormal behaviours, however, little quantitative evidence has thus far been collected to support this claim.[36]

Statistically, 1/10 of endangered birds tend to have egg infertility, but this number increases for breeders of endangered species working with captive birds.[31]

In addition to the abnormal behaviours exhibited as a result of commercialized captivity such as for poultry, there also exist problematic behaviours that occur as a function of the social deprivation associated with domestication. Social deprivation is the prevention or reduction of normal interaction between an individual and others in their species.[40] Currently the dominant method for rearing domesticated birds is "hand-rearing" which requires chicks be separated from their parents for periods of time up to several months.[41] The social deprivation associated with this technique of upbringing is one of the most detrimental forms of social deprivation since even short-term disruptions in parental care can cause extreme abnormal behaviour in the affected young.[41] For example, normal sexual and habitat imprinting is altered in both male and female birds as a result of maternal separation, as well as individual ability to adapt to stressors within the environment.[41] Neophobia is the avoidance of novel objects in the environment and is diminished with social deprivation and maternal separation.[41] A lack of neophobia can decrease probability of survival due to the affected animal's lack of hesitation to approach potentially dangerous stimuli. Moreover, many juveniles require a song tutor to accomplish the song learning necessary for successful mating practices.[42] Therefore, socially deprived juveniles may exhibit abnormal vocal and consequent mating behaviours which may be detrimental to their survival.

It is important to note that once established, these abnormal behaviours are often not transformable.[42] There is presently little research regarding a solution to the abnormality caused by captivity in birds; however, it has been suggested that keeping domesticated caged birds in small groups or pairs may reduce the likelihood of developing abnormal behaviours.[43]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ van Hoek, Caroline S.; Ten Cate, Carel (January 1998). "Abnormal Behavior in Caged Birds Kept as Pets". Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 1 (1): 51–64. doi:10.1207/s15327604jaws0101_5. ISSN 1088-8705. PMID 16363987.
  2. ^ McLeod, S. (2018). "Abnormal Psychology | Simply Psychology". www.simplypsychology.org. Retrieved 2019-09-29.
  3. ^ "abnormal behaviour". Retrieved April 6, 2013.
  4. ^ a b c Huber-Eicher, B; Sebö, F (November 2001). "The prevalence of feather pecking and development in commercial flocks of laying hens". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 74 (3): 223–231. doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00173-3. ISSN 0168-1591.
  5. ^ Buitenhuis, A. J.; Rodenburg, T. B.; Siwek, M.; Cornelissen, S. J.; Nieuwland, M. G.; Crooijmans, R. P.; Groenen, M. A.; Koene, P.; Bovenhuis, H.; van der Poel, J. J. (2003-11-01). "Identification of quantitative trait loci for receiving pecks in young and adult laying hens". Poultry Science. 82 (11): 1661–1667. doi:10.1093/ps/82.11.1661. ISSN 0032-5791. PMID 14653459.
  6. ^ Huber-Eicher, B. and Sebo, F., (2001). The prevalence of feather pecking and development in commercial flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 74: 223–231
  7. ^ Sherwin, C.M., Richards, G.J and Nicol, C.J., (2010). A comparison of the welfare of layer hens in four housing systems in the UK. British Poultry Science, 51(4): 488-499
  8. ^ Savory, J., (2010). Nutrition, feeding and drinking behaviour, and welfare. In The Welfare of Domestic Fowl and Other Captive Birds, I.J.H. Duncan and P. Hawkins (Eds). Springer. pp. 165-188
  9. ^ Savory, C.J., (1995). Feather pecking and cannibalism. World's Poultry Science Journal, 51: 215–219
  10. ^ Rodenburg, T.B., Komen, H., Ellen, E.D., Uitdehaag, K.A., and van Arendonk, J.A.M., (2008). Selection method and early-life history affect behavioural development, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 110: 217-228
  11. ^ a b c Mason, Georgia J. (June 1991). "Stereotypies: a critical review". Animal Behaviour. 41 (6): 1015–1037. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80640-2. hdl:10214/4622. ISSN 0003-3472. S2CID 53187334.
  12. ^ Sherwin, Chris M. (2009-12-21), "The Welfare and Ethical Assessment of Housing for Egg Production", The Welfare of Domestic Fowl and Other Captive Birds, Animal Welfare, vol. 9, Springer Netherlands, pp. 237–258, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3650-6_10, ISBN 9789048136490
  13. ^ Weitzenbürger, D.; Vits, A.; Hamann, H.; Distl, O. (October 2005). "Effect of furnished small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains". British Poultry Science. 46 (5): 553–559. doi:10.1080/00071660500303206. ISSN 0007-1668. PMID 16359107. S2CID 10933379.
  14. ^ Sherwin, C.M., (2010). The welfare and ethical assessment of housing for egg production. In The Welfare of Domestic Fowl and Other Captive Birds, I.J.H. Duncan and P. Hawkins (eds), Springer, pp. 237-258
  15. ^ Potzsch, C.J., Lewis, K., Nicol, C.J. and Green, L.E., (2001). A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of vent pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with feather pecking, management and disease. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 74: 259-272
  16. ^ Leonard, M.L., Horn, A.G. and Fairful, R.W., (1995). Correlates and consequences of allopecking in White Leghorn chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 43: 17-26
  17. ^ Buitenhuis, A.J., Rodenburg, T.B., Siwek, M., Cornelissen, S.J.B., Nieuwland, M.G.B., Crooijmans, R.P.M.A., Groenen, M.A.M., Koene, P., Bovenhuis, H., and van der Poel, J.J., (2003). Identification of quantitative trait loci for receiving pecks in young and adult laying hens. Poultry Science, 82: 1661-1667
  18. ^ "Feather Plucking in Pet Birds: Causes and Solutions". beautyofbirds.com. Retrieved 2014-04-02.
  19. ^ Clubb, Susan. "Bird Feather Plucking". Birdchannel.com. Archived from the original on 2008-10-22. Retrieved 2014-04-02.
  20. ^ "Parrots' behaviors mirror human mental disorders". News.uns.purdue.edu. 2005-12-21. Archived from the original on 2018-10-03. Retrieved 2014-04-02.
  21. ^ a b Sargent, T.D. and Keiper, R.R., (1967). Stereotypies in caged canaries. Animal Behaviour, 15: 62-66
  22. ^ "Food Toxicoses in Birds". www.realmacaw.com. Archived from the original on 4 October 2011. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
  23. ^ "Parrots | Parrot Conservation | Breeding". The Parrot Society UK. Retrieved 2014-04-02.
  24. ^ Hardy, W.T. and Westbrook R.F., (1981). Lithium-induced polydipsia in birds: A comparative study and analysis of electrolyte excretion. Physiology and Behavior, 27: 575-583
  25. ^ Olsson, I.A.S., Keeling L.J. and Duncan, I.J.H., (2002). Why do hens sham dustbathe when they have litter? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 76: 53–64
  26. ^ Merrill, R.J.N., Cooper, J.J., Albentosa M.J. and Nicol, C.J., (2006). The preferences of laying hens for perforated Astroturf over conventional wire as a dustbathing substrate in furnished cages. Animal Welfare, 15:173–178
  27. ^ van Liere, D.W., (1992). The significance of fowls' bathing in dust. Animal Welfare, 1: 187–202
  28. ^ Davis, Chris. "Jealousy And Your Bird". birdchannel.com. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  29. ^ Speer, Brian. "Ask An Expert". World Parrot Trust. Retrieved 6 July 2012.
  30. ^ Clark, Pamela. "Hormonal Behavior: Is Your Parrot A Victim?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 November 2012. Retrieved 20 December 2012.
  31. ^ a b Hemmings, N.; West, M.; Birkhead, T. R. (2012-12-23). "Causes of hatching failure in endangered birds". Biology Letters. 8 (6): 964–967. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0655. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 3497133. PMID 22977070.
  32. ^ a b Wilson, Liz (2001-09-01). "Biting and Screaming Behavior in Parrots". Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. Behavior. 4 (3): 641–650. doi:10.1016/S1094-9194(17)30028-2. ISSN 1094-9194. PMID 11601105.
  33. ^ Wiepkema, P.R. (1985). Abnormal behavior in farm animals: ethological implications. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 35, 279-299.
  34. ^ “There is no such thing as a cage bird”. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. <http://www.peta.org/issues/companion-animals/caging-birds.aspx>
  35. ^ Ten Cate, C. (1995). Behavioral development in birds and the implications of imprinting and song learning for captive propagation. Research and Captive Propagation, 187-197.
  36. ^ a b Lantermann, W. (1993). Social deprivation in Amazon parrots. Animal Behaviour, 38, 511-520.
  37. ^ Hughes, B.O. & Duncan, I.J.H. (1998). The notion of ethological “need,” models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1696-1707.
  38. ^ Slater, P.J, B., Jones, A. & Ten Cate, C. (1993). Can lack of experience delay the end of the sensitive phase for song learning? Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 43, 80-90.
  39. ^ Keiper, R.R. (1970). Studies of stereotypy function in the canary (Serinus canarius). Animal Behaviour, 18, 353-357.
  40. ^ Bassuk, Ellen L.; Donelan, Brigid; Selema, Bukelwa; Ali, Salma; Aguiar, Adriana Cavalcanti; Eisenstein, Evelyn; Vostanis, Panos; Varavikova, Elena; Tashjian, Madeleine (2003), "Social Deprivation", Trauma Interventions in War and Peace, International and Cultural Psychology Series, Springer US, pp. 33–55, doi:10.1007/978-0-306-47968-7_3, ISBN 9780306477232
  41. ^ a b c d Fox, Rebecca (January 2008). "Hand-Rearing: Behavioural Impacts and Implications for Captive Parrot Welfare" (PDF). Manual of Parrot Behaviour: 83–91.
  42. ^ a b Ten Cate, C (1995). "Behavioural development in birds and the implications of imprinting and song learning for captive propagation". Research and Captive Propagation: 187–197.
  43. ^ Lantermann, W (1993). "Social Deprivation in Amazon Parrots". Animal Behaviour. 38: 511–520.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abnormal_behaviour_of_birds_in_captivity&oldid=1217267664"