Wikipedia

Industrial wastewater treatment

(Redirected from Brewery wastewater)

Industrial wastewater treatment describes the processes used for treating wastewater that is produced by industries as an undesirable by-product. After treatment, the treated industrial wastewater (or effluent) may be reused or released to a sanitary sewer or to a surface water in the environment. Some industrial facilities generate wastewater that can be treated in sewage treatment plants. Most industrial processes, such as petroleum refineries, chemical and petrochemical plants have their own specialized facilities to treat their wastewaters so that the pollutant concentrations in the treated wastewater comply with the regulations regarding disposal of wastewaters into sewers or into rivers, lakes or oceans.[1]: 1412  This applies to industries that generate wastewater with high concentrations of organic matter (e.g. oil and grease), toxic pollutants (e.g. heavy metals, volatile organic compounds) or nutrients such as ammonia.[2]: 180  Some industries install a pre-treatment system to remove some pollutants (e.g., toxic compounds), and then discharge the partially treated wastewater to the municipal sewer system.[3]: 60 

Wastewater from an industrial process can be converted at a treatment plant to solids and treated water for reuse.

Most industries produce some wastewater. Recent trends have been to minimize such production or to recycle treated wastewater within the production process. Some industries have been successful at redesigning their manufacturing processes to reduce or eliminate pollutants.[4] Sources of industrial wastewater include battery manufacturing, chemical manufacturing, electric power plants, food industry, iron and steel industry, metal working, mines and quarries, nuclear industry, oil and gas extraction, petroleum refining and petrochemicals, pharmaceutical manufacturing, pulp and paper industry, smelters, textile mills, industrial oil contamination, water treatment and wood preserving. Treatment processes include brine treatment, solids removal (e.g. chemical precipitation, filtration), oils and grease removal, removal of biodegradable organics, removal of other organics, removal of acids and alkalis, and removal of toxic materials.

Types

edit

Industrial facilities may generate the following industrial wastewater flows:[citation needed]

Contaminants

edit
This section is an excerpt from Water pollution § Pollutants in industrial wastewater.[edit]

Industrial wastewater could add the following pollutants to receiving water bodies if the wastewater is not treated and managed properly:

Industrial sectors

edit

The specific pollutants generated and the resultant effluent concentrations can vary widely among the industrial sectors.[citation needed]

Battery manufacturing

edit

Battery manufacturers specialize in fabricating small devices for electronics and portable equipment (e.g., power tools), or larger, high-powered units for cars, trucks and other motorized vehicles. Pollutants generated at manufacturing plants includes cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, cyanide, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, silver, zinc, oil and grease.[13]

Centralized waste treatment

edit

A centralized waste treatment (CWT) facility processes liquid or solid industrial wastes generated by off-site manufacturing facilities. A manufacturer may send its wastes to a CWT plant, rather than perform treatment on site, due to constraints such as limited land availability, difficulty in designing and operating an on-site system, or limitations imposed by environmental regulations and permits. A manufacturer may determine that using a CWT is more cost-effective than treating the waste itself; this is often the case where the manufacturer is a small business.[14]

CWT plants often receive wastes from a wide variety of manufacturers, including chemical plants, metal fabrication and finishing; and used oil and petroleum products from various manufacturing sectors. The wastes may be classified as hazardous, have high pollutant concentrations or otherwise be difficult to treat. In 2000 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published wastewater regulations for CWT facilities in the US.[15]

Chemical manufacturing

edit
 
Chemical manufacturing discharge into the Cuyahoga River

Organic chemicals manufacturing

edit

The specific pollutants discharged by organic chemical manufacturers vary widely from plant to plant, depending on the types of products manufactured, such as bulk organic chemicals, resins, pesticides, plastics, or synthetic fibers. Some of the organic compounds that may be discharged are benzene, chloroform, naphthalene, phenols, toluene and vinyl chloride. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), which is a gross measurement of a range of organic pollutants, may be used to gauge the effectiveness of a biological wastewater treatment system, and is used as a regulatory parameter in some discharge permits. Metal pollutant discharges may include chromium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc.[16]

Inorganic chemicals manufacturing

edit

The inorganic chemicals sector covers a wide variety of products and processes, although an individual plant may produce a narrow range of products and pollutants. Products include aluminum compounds; calcium carbide and calcium chloride; hydrofluoric acid; potassium compounds; borax; chrome and fluorine-based compounds; cadmium and zinc-based compounds. The pollutants discharged vary by product sector and individual plant, and may include arsenic, chlorine, cyanide, fluoride; and heavy metals such as chromium, copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc.[17]

Electric power plants

edit
 
Illustration of wastewater streams discharged by typical coal-fired electric power plants in the United States

Fossil-fuel power stations, particularly coal-fired plants, are a major source of industrial wastewater. Many of these plants discharge wastewater with significant levels of metals such as lead, mercury, cadmium and chromium, as well as arsenic, selenium and nitrogen compounds (nitrates and nitrites). Wastewater streams include flue-gas desulfurization, fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas mercury control. Plants with air pollution controls such as wet scrubbers typically transfer the captured pollutants to the wastewater stream.[18]

Ash ponds, a type of surface impoundment, are a widely used treatment technology at coal-fired plants. These ponds use gravity to settle out large particulates (measured as total suspended solids) from power plant wastewater. This technology does not treat dissolved pollutants. Power stations use additional technologies to control pollutants, depending on the particular wastestream in the plant. These include dry ash handling, closed-loop ash recycling, chemical precipitation, biological treatment (such as an activated sludge process), membrane systems, and evaporation-crystallization systems.[18] Technological advancements in ion-exchange membranes and electrodialysis systems has enabled high efficiency treatment of flue-gas desulfurization wastewater to meet recent EPA discharge limits.[19] The treatment approach is similar for other highly scaling industrial wastewaters.[citation needed]

Food industry

edit
 
Seafood processing waste discharged to the town harbor in Sitka, Alaska

Wastewater generated from agricultural and food processing operations has distinctive characteristics that set it apart from common municipal wastewater managed by public or private sewage treatment plants throughout the world: it is biodegradable and non-toxic, but has high Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS).[20] The constituents of food and agriculture wastewater are often complex to predict, due to the differences in BOD and pH in effluents from vegetable, fruit, and meat products and due to the seasonal nature of food processing and post-harvesting.[citation needed]

Processing of food from raw materials requires large volumes of high grade water. Vegetable washing generates water with high loads of particulate matter and some dissolved organic matter. It may also contain surfactants and pesticides.

Aquaculture facilities (fish farms) often discharge large amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus, as well as suspended solids. Some facilities use drugs and pesticides, which may be present in the wastewater.[21]

Dairy processing plants generate conventional pollutants (BOD, SS).[22]

Animal slaughter and processing produces organic waste from body fluids, such as blood, and gut contents. Pollutants generated include BOD, SS, coliform bacteria, oil and grease, organic nitrogen and ammonia.[23]

Processing food for sale produces wastes generated from cooking which are often rich in plant organic material and may also contain salt, flavourings, colouring material and acids or alkali. Large quantities of fats, oil and grease ("FOG") may also be present, which in sufficient concentrations can clog sewer lines. Some municipalities require restaurants and food processing businesses to use grease interceptors and regulate the disposal of FOG in the sewer system.[24]

Food processing activities such as plant cleaning, material conveying, bottling, and product washing create wastewater. Many food processing facilities require on-site treatment before operational wastewater can be land applied or discharged to a waterway or a sewer system. High suspended solids levels of organic particles increase BOD and can result in significant sewer surcharge fees. Sedimentation, wedge wire screening, or rotating belt filtration (microscreening) are commonly used methods to reduce suspended organic solids loading prior to discharge.[citation needed]

 
Glass manufacturing wastewater in Louisiana

Glass manufacturing

edit

Glass manufacturing wastes vary with the type of glass manufactured, which includes fiberglass, plate glass, rolled glass, and glass containers, among others. The wastewater discharged by glass plants may include ammonia, BOD, chemical oxygen demand (COD), fluoride, lead, oil, phenol, and/or phosphorus. The discharges may also be highly acidic (low pH) or alkaline (high pH).[25]

Iron and steel industry

edit

The production of iron from its ores involves powerful reduction reactions in blast furnaces. Cooling waters are inevitably contaminated with products especially ammonia and cyanide. Production of coke from coal in coking plants also requires water cooling and the use of water in by-products separation. Contamination of waste streams includes gasification products such as benzene, naphthalene, anthracene, cyanide, ammonia, phenols, cresols together with a range of more complex organic compounds known collectively as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).[26]

The conversion of iron or steel into sheet, wire or rods requires hot and cold mechanical transformation stages frequently employing water as a lubricant and coolant. Contaminants include hydraulic oils, tallow and particulate solids. Final treatment of iron and steel products before onward sale into manufacturing includes pickling in strong mineral acid to remove rust and prepare the surface for tin or chromium plating or for other surface treatments such as galvanisation or painting. The two acids commonly used are hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid. Wastewater include acidic rinse waters together with waste acid. Although many plants operate acid recovery plants (particularly those using hydrochloric acid), where the mineral acid is boiled away from the iron salts, there remains a large volume of highly acid ferrous sulfate or ferrous chloride to be disposed of. Many steel industry wastewaters are contaminated by hydraulic oil, also known as soluble oil.[citation needed]

Metal working

edit

Many industries perform work on metal feedstocks (e.g. sheet metal, ingots) as they fabricate their final products. The industries include automobile, truck and aircraft manufacturing; tools and hardware manufacturing; electronic equipment and office machines; ships and boats; appliances and other household products; and stationary industrial equipment (e.g. compressors, pumps, boilers). Typical processes conducted at these plants include grinding, machining, coating and painting, chemical etching and milling, solvent degreasing, electroplating and anodizing. Wastewater generated from these industries may contain heavy metals (common heavy metal pollutants from these industries include cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver and zinc), cyanide and various chemical solvents, oil, and grease.[27][28]

Mines and quarries

edit
 
Mine wastewater effluent in Peru, with neutralized pH from tailing runoff

The principal waste-waters associated with mines and quarries are slurries of rock particles in water. These arise from rainfall washing exposed surfaces and haul roads and also from rock washing and grading processes. Volumes of water can be very high, especially rainfall related arisings on large sites.[29] Some specialized separation operations, such as coal washing to separate coal from native rock using density gradients, can produce wastewater contaminated by fine particulate haematite and surfactants. Oils and hydraulic oils are also common contaminants.[30]

Wastewater from metal mines and ore recovery plants are inevitably contaminated by the minerals present in the native rock formations. Following crushing and extraction of the desirable materials, undesirable materials may enter the wastewater stream. For metal mines, this can include unwanted metals such as zinc and other materials such as arsenic. Extraction of high value metals such as gold and silver may generate slimes containing very fine particles in where physical removal of contaminants becomes particularly difficult.[31]

Additionally, the geologic formations that harbour economically valuable metals such as copper and gold very often consist of sulphide-type ores. The processing entails grinding the rock into fine particles and then extracting the desired metal(s), with the leftover rock being known as tailings. These tailings contain a combination of not only undesirable leftover metals, but also sulphide components which eventually form sulphuric acid upon the exposure to air and water that inevitably occurs when the tailings are disposed of in large impoundments. The resulting acid mine drainage, which is often rich in heavy metals (because acids dissolve metals), is one of the many environmental impacts of mining.[31]

Nuclear industry

edit

The waste production from the nuclear and radio-chemicals industry is dealt with as Radioactive waste.[citation needed]

Researchers have looked at the bioaccumulation of strontium by Scenedesmus spinosus (algae) in simulated wastewater. The study claims a highly selective biosorption capacity for strontium of S. spinosus, suggesting that it may be appropriate for use of nuclear wastewater.[32]

Oil and gas extraction

edit

Oil and gas well operations generate produced water, which may contain oils, toxic metals (e.g. arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead), salts, organic chemicals and solids. Some produced water contains traces of naturally occurring radioactive material. Offshore oil and gas platforms also generate deck drainage, domestic waste and sanitary waste. During the drilling process, well sites typically discharge drill cuttings and drilling mud (drilling fluid).[33]

Petroleum refining and petrochemicals

edit

Pollutants discharged at petroleum refineries and petrochemical plants include conventional pollutants (BOD, oil and grease, suspended solids), ammonia, chromium, phenols and sulfides.[34]

Pharmaceutical manufacturing

edit

Pharmaceutical plants typically generate a variety of process wastewaters, including solvents, spent acid and caustic solutions, water from chemical reactions, product wash water, condensed steam, blowdown from air pollution control scrubbers, and equipment washwater. Non-process wastewaters typically include cooling water and site runoff. Pollutants generated by the industry include acetone, ammonia, benzene, BOD, chloroform, cyanide, ethanol, ethyl acetate, isopropanol, methylene chloride, methanol, phenol and toluene. Treatment technologies used include advanced biological treatment (e.g. activated sludge with nitrification), multimedia filtration, cyanide destruction (e.g. hydrolysis), steam stripping and wastewater recycling.[35]

Pulp and paper industry

edit
 
Wastewater discharge from a paper mill in the United States

Effluent from the pulp and paper industry is generally high in suspended solids and BOD. Plants that bleach wood pulp for paper making may generate chloroform, dioxins (including 2,3,7,8-TCDD), furans, phenols and chemical oxygen demand (COD).[36] Stand-alone paper mills using imported pulp may only require simple primary treatment, such as sedimentation or dissolved air flotation. Increased BOD or COD loadings, as well as organic pollutants, may require biological treatment such as activated sludge or upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. For mills with high inorganic loadings like salt, tertiary treatments may be required, either general membrane treatments like ultrafiltration or reverse osmosis or treatments to remove specific contaminants, such as nutrients.

See also: Environmental impact of paper

Smelters

edit

The pollutants discharged by nonferrous smelters vary with the base metal ore. Bauxite smelters generate phenols[37]: 131  but typically use settling basins and evaporation to manage these wastes, with no need to routinely discharge wastewater.[37]: 395  Aluminum smelters typically discharge fluoride, benzo(a)pyrene, antimony and nickel, as well as aluminum. Copper smelters typically generate cadmium, lead, zinc, arsenic and nickel, in addition to copper, in their wastewater. Lead smelters discharge lead and zinc. Nickel and cobalt smelters discharge ammonia and copper in addition to the base metals. Zinc smelters discharge arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium and zinc.[38]

Typical treatment processes used in the industry are chemical precipitation, sedimentation and filtration.[37]: 145 

Textile mills

edit

Textile mills, including carpet manufacturers, generate wastewater from a wide variety of processes, including cleaning and finishing, yarn manufacturing and fabric finishing (such as bleaching, dyeing, resin treatment, waterproofing and retardant flameproofing). Pollutants generated by textile mills include BOD, SS, oil and grease, sulfide, phenols and chromium.[39] Insecticide residues in fleeces are a particular problem in treating waters generated in wool processing. Animal fats may be present in the wastewater, which if not contaminated, can be recovered for the production of tallow or further rendering.[citation needed]

Textile dyeing plants generate wastewater that contain synthetic (e.g., reactive dyes, acid dyes, basic dyes, disperse dyes, vat dyes, sulphur dyes, mordant dyes, direct dyes, ingrain dyes, solvent dyes, pigment dyes)[40] and natural dyestuff, gum thickener (guar) and various wetting agents, pH buffers and dye retardants or accelerators. Following treatment with polymer-based flocculants and settling agents, typical monitoring parameters include BOD, COD, color (ADMI), sulfide, oil and grease, phenol, TSS and heavy metals (chromium, zinc, lead, copper).

Industrial oil contamination

edit

Industrial applications where oil enters the wastewater stream may include vehicle wash bays, workshops, fuel storage depots, transport hubs and power generation. Often the wastewater is discharged into local sewer or trade waste systems and must meet local environmental specifications. Typical contaminants can include solvents, detergents, grit, lubricants and hydrocarbons.

Water treatment

edit

Many industries have a need to treat water to obtain very high quality water for their processes. This might include pure chemical synthesis or boiler feed water. Also, some water treatment processes produce organic and mineral sludges from filtration and sedimentation which require treatment. Ion exchange using natural or synthetic resins removes calcium, magnesium and carbonate ions from water, typically replacing them with sodium, chloride, hydroxyl and/or other ions. Regeneration of ion-exchange columns with strong acids and alkalis produces a wastewater rich in hardness ions which are readily precipitated out, especially when in admixture with other wastewater constituents.

Wood preserving

edit

Wood preserving plants generate conventional and toxic pollutants, including arsenic, COD, copper, chromium, abnormally high or low pH, phenols, suspended solids, oil and grease.[41]

Treatment methods

edit
 
Dissolved air flotation systems are widely used at oil refineries, chemical plants and paper mills

The various types of contamination of wastewater require a variety of strategies to remove the contamination.[1] Most industrial processes, such as petroleum refineries, chemical and petrochemical plants have onsite facilities to treat their wastewaters so that the pollutant concentrations in the treated wastewater comply with the regulations regarding disposal of wastewaters into sewers or into rivers, lakes or oceans.[1]: 1412  Constructed wetlands are being used in an increasing number of cases as they provided high quality and productive on-site treatment. Other industrial processes that produce a lot of waste-waters such as paper and pulp production have created environmental concern, leading to development of processes to recycle water use within plants before they have to be cleaned and disposed.[42]

An industrial wastewater treatment plant may include one or more of the following rather than the conventional treatment sequence of sewage treatment plants:

Brine treatment

edit

Brine treatment involves removing dissolved salt ions from the waste stream. Although similarities to seawater or brackish water desalination exist, industrial brine treatment may contain unique combinations of dissolved ions, such as hardness ions or other metals, necessitating specific processes and equipment.

Brine treatment systems are typically optimized to either reduce the volume of the final discharge for more economic disposal (as disposal costs are often based on volume) or maximize the recovery of fresh water or salts. Brine treatment systems may also be optimized to reduce electricity consumption, chemical usage, or physical footprint.

Brine treatment is commonly encountered when treating cooling tower blowdown, produced water from steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), produced water from natural gas extraction such as coal seam gas, frac flowback water, acid mine or acid rock drainage, reverse osmosis reject, chlor-alkali wastewater, pulp and paper mill effluent, and waste streams from food and beverage processing.

Brine treatment technologies may include: membrane filtration processes, such as reverse osmosis; ion-exchange processes such as electrodialysis or weak acid cation exchange; or evaporation processes, such as brine concentrators and crystallizers employing mechanical vapour recompression and steam. Due to the ever increasing discharge standards, there has been an emergence of the use of advance oxidation processes for the treatment of brine. Some notable examples such as Fenton's oxidation[45][46] and ozonation[47] have been employed for degradation of recalcitrant compounds in brine from industrial plants.

Reverse osmosis may not be viable for brine treatment, due to the potential for fouling caused by hardness salts or organic contaminants, or damage to the reverse osmosis membranes from hydrocarbons.

Evaporation processes are the most widespread for brine treatment as they enable the highest degree of concentration, as high as solid salt. They also produce the highest purity effluent, even distillate-quality. Evaporation processes are also more tolerant of organics, hydrocarbons, or hardness salts. However, energy consumption is high and corrosion may be an issue as the prime mover is concentrated salt water. As a result, evaporation systems typically employ titanium or duplex stainless steel materials.

Brine management

edit

Brine management examines the broader context of brine treatment and may include consideration of government policy and regulations, corporate sustainability, environmental impact, recycling, handling and transport, containment, centralized compared to on-site treatment, avoidance and reduction, technologies, and economics. Brine management shares some issues with leachate management and more general waste management. In the recent years, there has been greater prevalence in brine management due to global push for zero liquid discharge (ZLD)/minimal liquid discharge (MLD).[48] In ZLD/MLD techniques, a closed water cycle is used to minimize water discharges from a system for water reuse. This concept has been gaining traction in recent years, due to increased water discharges and recent advancement in membrane technology. Increasingly, there has been also greater efforts to increase the recovery of materials from brines, especially from mining, geothermal wastewater or desalination brines.[49][50][51][52][53][54] Various literature demosntrates the vaibility of extraction of valuable materials like sodium bicarbonates, sodium chlorides and precious metals (like rubidium, cesium and lithium). The concept of ZLD/MLD encompasses the downstream management of wastewater brines, to reduce discharges and also derive valuable products from it.

Solids removal

edit

Most solids can be removed using simple sedimentation techniques with the solids recovered as slurry or sludge. Very fine solids and solids with densities close to the density of water pose special problems. In such case filtration or ultrafiltration may be required. Although flocculation may be used, using alum salts or the addition of polyelectrolytes. Wastewater from industrial food processing often requires on-site treatment before it can be discharged to prevent or reduce sewer surcharge fees. The type of industry and specific operational practices determine what types of wastewater is generated and what type of treatment is required. Reducing solids such as waste product, organic materials, and sand is often a goal of industrial wastewater treatment. Some common ways to reduce solids include primary sedimentation (clarification), dissolved air flotation (DAF), belt filtration (microscreening), and drum screening.

Oils and grease removal

edit

The effective removal of oils and grease is dependent on the characteristics of the oil in terms of its suspension state and droplet size, which will in turn affect the choice of separator technology. Oil in industrial waste water may be free light oil, heavy oil, which tends to sink, and emulsified oil, often referred to as soluble oil. Emulsified or soluble oils will typically required "cracking" to free the oil from its emulsion. In most cases this is achieved by lowering the pH of the water matrix.

Most separator technologies will have an optimum range of oil droplet sizes that can be effectively treated. Each separator technology will have its own performance curve outlining optimum performance based on oil droplet size. the most common separators are gravity tanks or pits, API oil-water separators or plate packs, chemical treatment via dissolved air flotations, centrifuges, media filters and hydrocyclones.

Analyzing the oily water to determine droplet size can be performed with a video particle analyser.

API oil-water separators

edit
This section is an excerpt from API oil–water separator.[edit]
An API oil–water separator is a device designed to separate gross amounts of oil and suspended solids from industrial wastewater produced at oil refineries, petrochemical plants, chemical plants, natural gas processing plants and other industrial oily water sources. The API separator is a gravity separation device designed by using Stokes Law to define the rise velocity of oil droplets based on their density and size. The design is based on the specific gravity difference between the oil and the wastewater because that difference is much smaller than the specific gravity difference between the suspended solids and water. The suspended solids settles to the bottom of the separator as a sediment layer, the oil rises to top of the separator and the cleansed wastewater is the middle layer between the oil layer and the solids.[55]

Hydrocyclone

edit

Hydrocyclone separators operate on the process where wastewater enters the cyclone chamber and is spun under extreme centrifugal forces more than 1000 times the force of gravity. This force causes the water and oil droplets (or solid particles) to separate. The separated materials is discharged from one end of the cyclone where treated water is discharged through the opposite end for further treatment, filtration or discharge. Hydrocyclones can also be utilised in a variety of context from solid-liquid separation to oil-water separation.[56][57][58][59]

Removal of biodegradable organics

edit
Further information: Secondary treatment

Biodegradable organic material of plant or animal origin is usually possible to treat using extended conventional sewage treatment processes such as activated sludge or trickling filter.[1][60] Problems can arise if the wastewater is excessively diluted with washing water or is highly concentrated such as undiluted blood or milk. The presence of cleaning agents, disinfectants, pesticides, or antibiotics can have detrimental impacts on treatment processes.[citation needed]

Activated sludge process

edit
This section is an excerpt from Activated sludge.[edit]
 
Activated sludge tank at Beckton sewage treatment plant, UK. The white bubbles are due to the diffused air aeration system.

The activated sludge process is a type of biological wastewater treatment process for treating sewage or industrial wastewaters using aeration and a biological floc composed of bacteria and protozoa. It is one of several biological wastewater treatment alternatives in secondary treatment, which deals with the removal of biodegradable organic matter and suspended solids. It uses air (or oxygen) and microorganisms to biologically oxidize organic pollutants, producing a waste sludge (or floc) containing the oxidized material.

The activated sludge process for removing carbonaceous pollution begins with an aeration tank where air (or oxygen) is injected into the waste water. This is followed by a settling tank to allow the biological flocs (the sludge blanket) to settle, thus separating the biological sludge from the clear treated water. Part of the waste sludge is recycled to the aeration tank and the remaining waste sludge is removed for further treatment and ultimate disposal.

Trickling filter process

edit
Main article: Trickling filter
 
A schematic cross-section of the contact face of the bed media in a trickling filter
 
A typical complete trickling filter system

A trickling filter consists of a bed of rocks, gravel, slag, peat moss, or plastic media over which wastewater flows downward and contacts a layer (or film) of microbial slime covering the bed media. Aerobic conditions are maintained by forced air flowing through the bed or by natural convection of air. The process involves adsorption of organic compounds in the wastewater by the microbial slime layer, diffusion of air into the slime layer to provide the oxygen required for the biochemical oxidation of the organic compounds. The end products include carbon dioxide gas, water and other products of the oxidation. As the slime layer thickens, it becomes difficult for the air to penetrate the layer and an inner anaerobic layer is formed.[citation needed]

Removal of other organics

edit

Synthetic organic materials including solvents, paints, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, products from coke production and so forth can be very difficult to treat. Treatment methods are often specific to the material being treated. Methods include advanced oxidation processing, distillation, adsorption, ozonation, vitrification, incineration, chemical immobilisation or landfill disposal. Some materials such as some detergents may be capable of biological degradation and in such cases, a modified form of wastewater treatment can be used.

Removal of acids and alkalis

edit

Acids and alkalis can usually be neutralised under controlled conditions. Neutralisation frequently produces a precipitate that will require treatment as a solid residue that may also be toxic. In some cases, gases may be evolved requiring treatment for the gas stream. Some other forms of treatment are usually required following neutralisation.

Waste streams rich in hardness ions as from de-ionisation processes can readily lose the hardness ions in a buildup of precipitated calcium and magnesium salts. This precipitation process can cause severe furring of pipes and can, in extreme cases, cause the blockage of disposal pipes. A 1-metre diameter industrial marine discharge pipe serving a major chemicals complex was blocked by such salts in the 1970s. Treatment is by concentration of de-ionisation waste waters and disposal to landfill or by careful pH management of the released wastewater.

Removal of toxic materials

edit

Toxic materials including many organic materials, metals (such as zinc, silver, cadmium, thallium, etc.) acids, alkalis, non-metallic elements (such as arsenic or selenium) are generally resistant to biological processes unless very dilute. Metals can often be precipitated out by changing the pH or by treatment with other chemicals. Many, however, are resistant to treatment or mitigation and may require concentration followed by landfilling or recycling. Dissolved organics can be incinerated within the wastewater by the advanced oxidation process.

Smart capsules

edit

Molecular encapsulation is a technology that has the potential to provide a system for the recyclable removal of lead and other ions from polluted sources. Nano-, micro- and milli- capsules, with sizes in the ranges 10 nm–1μm,1μm–1mm and >1mm, respectively, are particles that have an active reagent (core) surrounded by a carrier (shell).There are three types of capsule under investigation: alginate-based capsules, carbon nanotubes, polymer swelling capsules. These capsules provide a possible means for the remediation of contaminated water.[61]

Removal of thermal pollution

edit

To remove heat from wastewater generated by power plants or manufacturing plants, and thus to reduce thermal pollution, the following technologies are used:

Other disposal methods

edit

Some facilities such as oil and gas wells may be permitted to pump their wastewater underground through injection wells. However, wastewater injection has been linked to induced seismicity.[63]

Costs and trade waste charges

edit

Economies of scale may favor a situation where industrial wastewater (with pre-treatment or without treatment) is discharged to the sewer and then treated at a large municipal sewage treatment plant. Typically, trade waste charges are applied in that case. Or it might be more economical to have full treatment of industrial wastewater on the same site where it is generated and then discharging this treated industrial wastewater to a suitable surface water body. This effectively reduces wastewater treatment charges collected by municipal sewage treatment plants by pre-treating wastewaters to reduce concentrations of pollutants measured to determine user fees.[64]: 300–302 

Industrial wastewater plants may also reduce raw water costs by converting selected wastewaters to reclaimed water used for different purposes.

Society and culture

edit

Global goals

edit

The international community has defined the treatment of industrial wastewater as an important part of sustainable development by including it in Sustainable Development Goal 6. Target 6.3 of this goal is to "By 2030, improve water quality by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and substantially increasing recycling and safe reuse globally".[65] One of the indicators for this target is the "proportion of domestic and industrial wastewater flows safely treated".[66]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (2003). Metcalf & Eddy Wastewater Engineering: treatment and reuse (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Company. ISBN 0-07-041878-0.
  2. ^ George Tchobanoglous; Franklin L. Burton; H. David Stensel (2003). "Chapter 3: Analysis and Selection of Wastewater Flowrates and Constituent Loadings". Metcalf & Eddy Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-041878-0. OCLC 48053912.
  3. ^ Von Sperling, M. (2007). "Wastewater Characteristics, Treatment and Disposal". Water Intelligence Online. 6. doi:10.2166/9781780402086. ISSN 1476-1777.   Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  4. ^ "Pollution Prevention Case Studies". Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 11 August 2021.
  5. ^ Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (2003). "Chapter 3: Analysis and Selection of Wastewater Flowrates and Constituent Loadings". Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-041878-0. OCLC 48053912.
  6. ^ Laws EA (2018). Aquatic Pollution: An Introductory Text (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-119-30450-0 – via Google Books.
  7. ^ Arvaniti OS, Stasinakis AS (August 2015). "Review on the occurrence, fate and removal of perfluorinated compounds during wastewater treatment". The Science of the Total Environment. 524–525: 81–92. Bibcode:2015ScTEn.524...81A. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.023. PMID 25889547.
  8. ^ Bletsou AA, Asimakopoulos AG, Stasinakis AS, Thomaidis NS, Kannan K (February 2013). "Mass loading and fate of linear and cyclic siloxanes in a wastewater treatment plant in Greece". Environmental Science & Technology. 47 (4): 1824–32. Bibcode:2013EnST...47.1824B. doi:10.1021/es304369b. PMID 23320453. S2CID 39997737.
  9. ^ Gatidou G, Kinyua J, van Nuijs AL, Gracia-Lor E, Castiglioni S, Covaci A, Stasinakis AS (September 2016). "Drugs of abuse and alcohol consumption among different groups of population on the Greek Island of Lesvos through sewage-based epidemiology". The Science of the Total Environment. 563–564: 633–40. Bibcode:2016ScTEn.563..633G. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.130. hdl:10067/1345920151162165141. PMID 27236142. S2CID 4073701.
  10. ^ Gatidou G, Arvaniti OS, Stasinakis AS (April 2019). "Review on the occurrence and fate of microplastics in Sewage Treatment Plants". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 367: 504–512. Bibcode:2019JHzM..367..504G. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.081. PMID 30620926. S2CID 58567561.
  11. ^ Johnson MS, Buck RC, Cousins IT, Weis CP, Fenton SE (March 2021). "Estimating Environmental Hazard and Risks from Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): Outcome of a SETAC Focused Topic Meeting". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 40 (3): 543–549. doi:10.1002/etc.4784. PMC 8387100. PMID 32452041.
  12. ^ Sinclair GM, Long SM, Jones OA (November 2020). "What are the effects of PFAS exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations?". Chemosphere. 258: 127340. Bibcode:2020Chmsp.25827340S. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127340. PMID 32563917. S2CID 219974801.
  13. ^ "Battery Manufacturing Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 12 June 2017.
  14. ^ "Chapter 4. Description of the Industry". Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines for the Centralized Waste Treatment Industry (Report). EPA. August 2000. EPA 821-R-00-020.
  15. ^ "Centralized Waste Treatment Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 24 January 2022.
  16. ^ Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines, New Source Performance Standards and Pretreatment Standards for the Organic Chemicals, Plastics And Synthetic Fibers Point Source Category; Volume I (Report). EPA. October 1987. EPA 440/1-87/009.
  17. ^ EPA (1982). "Inorganic Chemicals Manufacturing Point Source Category." Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 415
  18. ^ a b "Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category". EPA. 30 September 2015.
  19. ^ "Lowering Cost and Waste in Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Treatment". Power Mag. Electric Power. March 2017. Retrieved 6 April 2017.
  20. ^ European Environment Agency. Copenhagen, Denmark. "Indicator: Biochemical oxygen demand in rivers (2001)." Archived 2006-09-18 at the Wayback Machine
  21. ^ EPA (2002-09-12). "Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category." Proposed rule. Federal Register, 67 FR 57876
  22. ^ "Dairy Products Processing Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 30 November 2018.
  23. ^ Technical Development Document for the Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point Source Category (Report). EPA. 2004. EPA 821-R-04-011.
  24. ^ "Fats, Oils, & Grease". Special Wastewater Discharge Requirements. Laurel, MD: Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. 29 September 2021.
  25. ^ "Glass Manufacturing Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 24 June 2024.
  26. ^ "7. Wastewater Characterization". Development Document for Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category (Report). EPA. 2002. pp. 7–1ff. EPA 821-R-02-004.
  27. ^ "Metal Finishing Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 5 July 2019.
  28. ^ "Metal Products and Machinery Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 13 July 2021.
  29. ^ Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Mineral Mining and Processing Category (Report). EPA. July 1979. EPA 440/1-76/059b.
  30. ^ Development Document for the Coal Mining Category (Report). EPA. September 1982. EPA 440/1-82/057.
  31. ^ a b Development Document for Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Ore Mining and Dressing Point Source Category (Report). EPA. November 1982. EPA 440/1-82/061.
  32. ^ Liu, Mingxue; Dong, Faqin; Kang, Wu; Sun, Shiyong; Wei, Hongfu; Zhang, Wei; Nie, Xiaoqin; Guo, Yuting; Huang, Ting; Liu, Yuanyuan (2014). "Biosorption of Strontium from Simulated Nuclear Wastewater by Scenedesmus spinosus under Culture Conditions: Adsorption and Bioaccumulation Processes and Models". Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11 (6): 6099–6118. doi:10.3390/ijerph110606099. PMC 4078568. PMID 24919131.
  33. ^ Development Document for Interim Final Effuent Limitations Guidelines and Proposed New Source Performance Standards for the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category (Report). EPA. September 1976. pp. 41–45. EPA 440/1-76/055a.
  34. ^ Guide for the Application of Effluent Limitations Guidelines for the Petroleum Refining Industry (Report). EPA. June 1985. p. 5.
  35. ^ "Chapters 5–7" (PDF). Development Document for Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Point Source Category (Report). EPA. July 1998. EPA 821-R-98-005.
  36. ^ Permit Guidance Document: Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Manufacturing Point Source Category (Report). EPA. 2000. pp. 4–1ff. EPA-821-B-00-003.
  37. ^ a b c Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing Point Source Category; Volume 1 (Report). EPA. May 1989. EPA 440/1-89/019.1.
  38. ^ EPA (1984). "Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing Point Source Category." Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 421
  39. ^ "Textile Mills Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 30 June 2017.
  40. ^ M. Clark, ed. (2011). Handbook of Textile and Industrial Dyeing: Principles, Processes and Types of Dyes. Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-84569-695-5.
  41. ^ "Timber Products Processing Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 13 March 2018.
  42. ^ Byrd, J.F.; Ehrke, M.D.; Whitfield, J.I. (April 1984). "New Bleached Kraft Pulp Plant in Georgia: State of the Art Environmental Control". Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation). 56 (4): 378–385. JSTOR 25042250..
  43. ^ a b Patterson, James William (1975). Wastewater treatment technology. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ann Arbor Science. ISBN 0-250-40086-3. OCLC 1988397.
  44. ^ a b Kemmer, Frank N. (1979). The Nalco Water Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. OCLC 4493039.
  45. ^ Cai, Q.Q.; Lee, B.C.Y.; Ong, S.L.; Hu, J.Y. (February 2021). "Fluidized-bed Fenton technologies for recalcitrant industrial wastewater treatment–Recent advances, challenges and perspective". Water Research. 190: 116692. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116692. PMID 33279748. S2CID 227523802.
  46. ^ Cai, Qinqing; Lee, Brandon Chuan Yee; Ong, Say Leong; Hu, Jiangyong (9 April 2021). "Application of a Multiobjective Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in Industrial Reverse Osmosis Concentrate Treatment with a Fluidized Bed Fenton Process: Performance Prediction and Process Optimization". ACS ES&T Water. 1 (4): 847–858. doi:10.1021/acsestwater.0c00192. ISSN 2690-0637. S2CID 234110033.
  47. ^ Loh, W.H.; Cai, Q.Q.; Li, R.; Jothinathan, L.; Lee, B.C.Y.; Ng, O.H.; Guo, J.; Ong, S.L.; Hu, J.Y. (December 2021). "Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by microbubble ozonation-biological activated carbon process: Organics removal performance and environmental impact assessment". Science of the Total Environment. 798: 149289. Bibcode:2021ScTEn.798n9289L. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149289. PMID 34340085.
  48. ^ Muhammad Yaqub; Lee, Wontae (1 September 2019). "Zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) technology for resource recovery from wastewater: A review". Science of the Total Environment. 681: 551–563. Bibcode:2019ScTEn.681..551Y. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.062. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 31125930. S2CID 164218318.
  49. ^ Alsabbagh, Ahmad; Aljarrah, Sewar; Almahasneh, Majdi (August 2021). "Lithium enrichment optimization from Dead Sea end brine by chemical precipitation technique". Minerals Engineering. 170: 107038. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107038. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 237700530.
  50. ^ Lundaev, Vitalii; Solomon, A. A.; Caldera, Upeksha; Breyer, Christian (1 July 2022). "Material extraction potential of desalination brines: A technical and economic evaluation of brines as a possible new material source". Minerals Engineering. 185: 107652. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107652. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 250296056.
  51. ^ Zhang, Ye; Hu, Yuehua; Wang, Li; Sun, Wei (1 August 2019). "Systematic review of lithium extraction from salt-lake brines via precipitation approaches". Minerals Engineering. 139: 105868. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2019.105868. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 199070455.
  52. ^ Tabelin, Carlito Baltazar; Dallas, Jessica; Casanova, Sophia; Pelech, Timothy; Bournival, Ghislain; Saydam, Serkan; Canbulat, Ismet (15 March 2021). "Towards a low-carbon society: A review of lithium resource availability, challenges and innovations in mining, extraction and recycling, and future perspectives". Minerals Engineering. 163: 106743. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106743. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 233658167.
  53. ^ Ozcan, O; Miller, J. D (1 August 2002). "Flotation of sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate salts from their saturated brines". Minerals Engineering. 15 (8): 577–584. doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(02)00087-0. ISSN 0892-6875.
  54. ^ Fang, Dezhen; Lu, Miao; Wang, Yanping; Ma, Liang; Li, Kexin; Liu, Haining; Zhang, Huifang; Shi, Guosheng; Wu, Zhijian; Ye, Xiushen (1 October 2023). "Extraction of rubidium and cesium from oilfield brine by the two-step adsorption–flotation method". Minerals Engineering. 201: 108161. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108161. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 259493806.
  55. ^ Beychok, Milton R. (1967). Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons. LCCN 67019834.
  56. ^ Göktaş, İbrahim; Altun, Okay; Alper Toprak, Nurettin; Altun, Deniz (1 July 2023). "Element based ball mill and hydrocyclone modelling for a copper ore grinding circuit". Minerals Engineering. 198: 108090. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108090. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 258368865.
  57. ^ Ullmann, Grégori; Gonçalves, Suélen Mara; Kyriakidis, Yanne Novais; de Souza Barrozo, Marcos Antonio; Vieira, Luiz Gustavo Martins (15 August 2021). "Optimization study of thickener hydrocyclones". Minerals Engineering. 170: 107066. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107066. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 237698803.
  58. ^ Toprak, Nurettin Alper; Altun, Okay (1 November 2021). "Considering hydrocyclone operation for tailings dewatering purpose and its effects on product specifications of paste backfill operations". Minerals Engineering. 173: 107176. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107176. ISSN 0892-6875. S2CID 240531707.
  59. ^ Husveg, Trygve; Rambeau, Odile; Drengstig, Tormod; Bilstad, Torleiv (1 April 2007). "Performance of a deoiling hydrocyclone during variable flow rates". Minerals Engineering. SPECIAL ISSUE: Selected papers from Ultrafine Grinding ’06 and Hydrocyclones ’06, held in Falmouth, UK in June 2006. 20 (4): 368–379. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2006.12.002. ISSN 0892-6875.
  60. ^ Beychok, Milton R. (1967). Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons. LCCN 67019834.
  61. ^ Tylkowski, Bartosz; Jastrząb, Renata (2017). "Smart Capsules for Lead Removal from Industrial Wastewater". In Sigel, Astrid; Sigel, Helmut; Sigel, Roland K.O (eds.). Lead: Its Effects on Environment and Health. Metal Ions in Life Sciences. Vol. 17. pp. 61–78. doi:10.1515/9783110434330-004. ISBN 978-3-11-043433-0. PMID 28731297.
  62. ^ Profile of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation Industry (Report). EPA. September 1997. p. 24. EPA/310-R-97-007.
  63. ^ van der Baan, Mirko; Calixto, Frank J. (1 July 2017). "Human-induced seismicity and large-scale hydrocarbon production in the USA and Canada". Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 18 (7): 2467–2485. Bibcode:2017GGG....18.2467V. doi:10.1002/2017gc006915. ISSN 1525-2027.
  64. ^ Hammer, Mark J. (1975). Water and waste-water technology. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-34726-4. OCLC 1176821.
  65. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  66. ^ Ritchie, Roser, Mispy, Ortiz-Ospina. "Measuring progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals, Goal 6" SDG-Tracker.org, website (2018).

Further reading

edit
  • Water Environment Federation (2020). Industrial Wastewater Management, Treatment & Disposal; Manual of Practice FD-3 (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation. ISBN 978-1-57278-369-0.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Industrial_wastewater_treatment&oldid=1248120752#Food_industry"