Category talk:Inuyama, Aichi

Opposed speedy move request

• Category:Inuyama, Aichi to Category:Inuyama – Make category name in sync with article name. Gryffindor (talk) 21:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

  I only tagged it for move now.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose speedy Please consider that all the other categories included in Category:Cities in Aichi Prefecture are as well named Category:City, Aichi if we change this category should me not as well change all te others as well? For this reason I Oppose to speedy renaming and suggest to follow the normal procedure. --Robby (talk) 16:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose per Armbrust but its already been moved and maybe should be reverted. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

  Sorry, I didn't notice the comments here, I just checked the talk pages before making the move (there were no comments there). No objections to it being moved back, the main thing for me is that we should only have one category for this rather than two! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

  I reverted the move, so it's now back at Category:Inuyama, Aichi. After that I realised that there was some deleted page history at Category:Inuyama, Aichi, which I undeleted. For the record:

  1. Gryffindor created Category:Inuyama in 2017.
  2. MChew created Category:Inuyama, Aichi on 19 Oct 2019.
  3. Robby merged the contents [1] and redirected the old category later that day.
  4. Gryffindor nominated the new category for merger back to the old name.
  5. Mike Peel deleted the old category page and moved the new one over it on 9 Nov.
  6. I reverted Mike's actions today.

  @Mike Peel: thanks for acknowledging that you should have checked incoming links for current discussions. Even if the move had been correct, it would have been better to merge the page histories (by undeleting it after your move, see WP:CUTPASTE), or simply to redirect the new category page rather than move it over the old one; either way, the original history would then have been visible. – Fayenatic London 10:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

  Also note User_talk:MChew#Duplicate? that never got a reply. I thought I had restored the original history, sorry also for that! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

  @Gryffindor, Robby, MChew, Crouch, Swale, Mike Peel, and Fayenatic london: Strong oppose as now moot due to disambiguation added at Inuyama. ミラP 04:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)