Category talk:Pseudoscientific physicists

Opposed speedy move request

• Category:Pseudoscientific physicists to Category:Pseudophysicists – C2C: And main article Pseudophysics. But leave the old title as a redirect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose speedy @LaundryPizza03: Pseudoscience is by its nature controversial. Also Category:Advocates of pseudoscience has amix of formats: Pseudoarchaeologists‎ and Pseudoastronomers‎, but also Pseudoscientific biologists‎, Pseudoscientific diet advocates, Pseudoscientific physicists‎ and Pseudoscientific psychologists‎. TSventon (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

  "Pseudoscience is by its nature controversial" has no bearing on the decision between "Pseudoscientific physicists" and "Pseudophysicists" because pseudophysics is also "by its nature controversial".

  "has a mix a formats" is not the same as "should have a mix of formats".

  So, both reasons are invalid. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

  I just checked the articles in the category:

  • Jim Carter (pseudoscientist)
  • Masaru Emoto
  • Corentin Louis Kervran
  • Stefan Marinov
  • Mohamed El Naschie
  • Kauko Armas Nieminen
  • Viktor Petrik

  Of those, only Marinov is actually a physicist. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)