This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2015) |
Concordance democracy is a type of governing / ruling a country that aims to involve as many different groups as possible (parties, associations, minorities, social groups) in the political process and to make decisions by reaching a consensus. In this respect, concordance democracy is a form of consensus democracy. The counter-model to concordance democracy is called competitive democracy or majority democracy.[1][2]
In Swiss politics, the concordance system (German Konkordanzsystem) is the integration of the major political parties into the seven-member Federal Council.[3]
The concordance system is based on two principles
- an arithmetic rule of proportionality: the Federal Council should be representative of the political forces of the country, that is, its composition should be similar to that of the Federal Assembly.
- a political rule of consensus: the government must reach a compromise, even though it is composed of antagonistic parties.
One of the reasons explaining the system, which also exists at the cantonal level, is the perceived "threat" of direct democracy, since a sizeable opposition could in principle "paralyse" the government by submitting too many referendum proposals.
The fact that the members of the government must reach common decisions and stand by them is referred to as the principle of collegiality (German Kollegialitätsprinzip), grounded in the Federal Constitution (art. 177 al.1).[4] The members of the Federal Council are supposed to forgo party politics and promote a cooperative spirit among the members of the executive. They must defend the government's official positions even if doing so goes against their personal views or those of their party.
History
editIn 1848 the new Federal Constitution made Switzerland a federation of States, and no longer a Confederation. It thus introduced an executive organ at the federal level, the Swiss Federal Council. The membership of the Federal Council has never been changed in its entirety, since there have always been partial elections of some of its members. Technically, Switzerland has always had the same stable and consensual government, in contrast to most western democracies, which see regular alternance between left and right major parties. The concordance system started in 1891 with the election of Josef Zemp, a Christian Conservative, to the Federal Council, which had previously been composed entirely of Free Democrats. The fact that this led to a reduced opposition from outside the government has since been referred to by some Swiss political scientists[5] as "The Zemp effect". From 1959 to 2003, the Federal Council comprised two Free Democrats, two Social Democrats, two Christian Democrats, and one member of the Swiss People's Party, based on an unwritten rule known as the "magic formula".[6] Since 2003, however, the composition has changed to reflect the rise of the Swiss People's Party.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Zapf, Wolfgang (1997). "Entwicklung als Modernisierung". Entwicklung. Die Perspektive der Entwicklungssoziologie. Opladen: Manfred Schulz (Hrsg.), Westdeutscher Verlag. pp. 31ff.
- ^ O'Leary, Brendan (2005). "Debating consociational politics: Normative and explanatory arguments". From Power Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies. Montreal: In Noel, Sid JR (ed.), McGill-Queen's Press. pp. 3–43. ISBN 0-7735-2948-9.
- ^ Morandi, Pietro (2016). "Konkordanzdemokratie". Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften, SAGW ASSH. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019.
- ^ Ueberwasser, Heinrich (2008). "Kollegialsystem". Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz (HLS). Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes-und Sozialwissenschaften SAGW ASSH. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019.
- ^ Pascal Sciarini, citing Raimund Germann, 2004, http://www.idheap.ch/idheap.nsf/go/1DC8268666521EA6C1256FDA00587659?OpenDocument&lng=it
- ^ "The 'magic formula'". The Federal Council (Switzerland). 2020. Archived from the original on 21 May 2015.