Curvature renormalization group method

In theoretical physics, the curvature renormalization group (CRG) method is an analytical approach to determine the phase boundaries and the critical behavior of topological systems. Topological phases are phases of matter that appear in certain quantum mechanical systems at zero temperature because of a robust degeneracy in the ground-state wave function. They are called topological because they can be described by different (discrete) values of a nonlocal topological invariant. This is to contrast with non-topological phases of matter (e.g. ferromagnetism) that can be described by different values of a local order parameter. States with different values of the topological invariant cannot change into each other without a phase transition. The topological invariant is constructed from a curvature function that can be calculated from the bulk Hamiltonian of the system. At the phase transition, the curvature function diverges, and the topological invariant correspondingly jumps abruptly from one value to another. The CRG method works by detecting the divergence in the curvature function, and thus determining the boundaries between different topological phases. Furthermore, from the divergence of the curvature function, it extracts scaling laws that describe the critical behavior, i.e. how different quantities (such as susceptibility or correlation length) behave as the topological phase transition is approached. The CRG method has been successfully applied to a variety of static, periodically driven, weakly and strongly interacting systems to classify the nature of the corresponding topological phase transitions.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Background

edit

Topological phases are quantum phases of matter that are characterized by robust ground state degeneracy and quantized geometric phases.[11] Transitions between different topological phases are usually called topological phase transitions, which are characterized by discrete jumps of the topological invariant  . Upon tuning one or multiple system parameters  ,   jumps abruptly from one integer to another at the critical point  . Typically, the topological invariant   takes the form of an integration of a curvature function   in momentum space:

Behavior of the curvature function (Berry connection) for the Kitaev model (top panel) as a function of a parameter change in parameter space (bottom panel). The vertical red lines depict topological phase boundaries. Across the topological phase transitions, the Berry connection diverges and flips sign around the high-symmetry points k=0.

 Depending on the dimensionality and symmetries of the system, the curvature function can be a Berry connection, a Berry curvature, or a more complicated object.

In the vicinity of high symmetry points   in a  -dimensional momentum space, where   is a reciprocal lattice vector, the curvature function typically displays a Lorentzian shape[3][5][8]  where   defines the width of the multidimensional peak. Approaching the critical point   the peak gradually diverges, flipping sign across the transition: This behavior is displayed in the video on the side for the case  .

Scaling laws, critical exponents, and universality

edit

The divergence of the curvature function permits the definition of critical exponents   as  The conservation of the topological invariant  , as the transition is approached from one side or the other, yields a scaling law that constraints the exponents[3][5][8]  where   is the dimensionality of the problem. These exponents serve to classify topological phase transitions into different universality classes.[3][5][8]

To experimentally measure the critical exponents, one needs to have access to the curvature function with a certain level of accuracy. Good candidates at present are quantum engineered photonics and ultracold atomic systems. In the first case, the curvature function can be extracted from the anomalous displacement of wave packets under optical pulse pumping in coupled fibre loops.[12] For ultracold atoms in optical lattices, the Berry curvature can be achieved through quantum interference[13] or force-induced wave-packet velocity measurements.[14][15]

Correlation function

edit

The Fourier transform of the curvature function  typically measures the overlap of certain quantum mechanical wave functions or more complicated objects,[7][8][9] and therefore it is interpreted as a correlation function. For instance, if the curvature function is the noninteracting or many-body Berry connection or Berry curvature, the correlation function   is a measure of the overlap of Wannier functions centered at two home cells that are distance   apart.[3][5][8] Because of the Lorentzian shape of the curvature function mentioned above, the Fourier transform of the curvature function decays with the length scale  . Hence,   is interpreted as the correlation length, and its critical exponent is assigned to be   like in Landau theory. Furthermore, the correlation length is related to the localization length of topological edge states, such as Majorana modes.[7]

Scaling equation

edit

The scaling procedure that identifies the topological phase transitions is based on the divergence of the curvature function. It is an iterative procedure that, for a given parameter set   that controls the topology, searches for a new parameter set   that satisfies  where   is a high-symmetry point and   is a small deviation away from it. This procedure searches for the path in the parameter space of   along which the divergence of the curvature function reduces, yielding a renormalization group flow that flows away from the topological phase transitions. The name "curvature renormalization group" is derived precisely from this procedure that renormalizes the profile of the curvature function. Writing  and  , and expanding the scaling equation above to leading order yields the generic renormalization group equation

 
Topological phase diagram of the periodically driven Kitaev chain obtained with the curvature renormalization group method

 The renormalization group flow can be obtained directly as a stream plot of the right hand side of this differential equation. Numerically, this differential equation only requires the evaluation of the curvature function at few momenta. Hence, the method is a very efficient way to identify topological phase transitions, especially in periodically driven systems (aka Floquet systems) and interacting systems.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Chen, W. (2016). "Scaling theory of topological phase transitions". J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 28 (2): 055601. arXiv:1505.05345. Bibcode:2016JPCM...28e5601C. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/5/055601. PMID 26790004. S2CID 26562531.
  2. ^ a b Chen, Wei; Sigrist, Manfred; Schnyder, Andreas P (2016-09-14). "Scaling theory of Z topological invariants". Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 28 (36): 365501. arXiv:1604.07662. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/36/365501. ISSN 0953-8984. PMID 27400801. S2CID 46854459.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Chen, Wei; Legner, Markus; Rüegg, Andreas; Sigrist, Manfred (2017-02-07). "Correlation length, universality classes, and scaling laws associated with topological phase transitions". Physical Review B. 95 (7): 075116. arXiv:1611.06093. Bibcode:2017PhRvB..95g5116C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.075116. S2CID 118857776.
  4. ^ a b Kourtis, Stefanos; Neupert, Titus; Mudry, Christopher; Sigrist, Manfred; Chen, Wei (2017-11-10). "Weyl-type topological phase transitions in fractional quantum Hall like systems". Physical Review B. 96 (20): 205117. arXiv:1708.04244. Bibcode:2017PhRvB..96t5117K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205117. ISSN 2469-9950. S2CID 118933016.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Chen, Wei; Schnyder, Andreas P. (July 2019). "Universality classes of topological phase transitions with higher-order band crossing". New Journal of Physics. 21 (7): 073003. arXiv:1901.11468. Bibcode:2019NJPh...21g3003C. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab2a2d. ISSN 1367-2630. S2CID 119057056.
  6. ^ a b Chen, Wei (2018-03-14). "Weakly interacting topological insulators: Quantum criticality and the renormalization group approach". Physical Review B. 97 (11): 115130. arXiv:1801.00697. Bibcode:2018PhRvB..97k5130C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.115130. ISSN 2469-9950. S2CID 119078563.
  7. ^ a b c d Molignini, Paolo; Chen, Wei; Chitra, R. (2018-09-17). "Universal quantum criticality in static and Floquet-Majorana chains". Physical Review B. 98 (12): 125129. arXiv:1805.09698. Bibcode:2018PhRvB..98l5129M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.125129. ISSN 2469-9950. S2CID 62836882.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Chen, Wei; Sigrist, Manfred (2019-03-15), Luo, Huixia (ed.), "Topological Phase Transitions: Criticality, Universality, and Renormalization Group Approach", Advanced Topological Insulators, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 239–280, doi:10.1002/9781119407317.ch7, ISBN 978-1-119-40731-7, S2CID 126525389
  9. ^ a b c Molignini, Paolo; Chitra, R.; Chen, Wei (2020-01-20). "Unifying topological phase transitions in non-interacting, interacting, and periodically driven systems". EPL (Europhysics Letters). 128 (3): 36001. arXiv:1912.08819. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/128/36001. ISSN 1286-4854.
  10. ^ a b Molignini, Paolo; Chen, Wei; Chitra, R. (2020). "Generating quantum multicriticality in topological insulators by periodic driving". Physical Review B. 101 (16): 165106. arXiv:1906.10695. Bibcode:2020PhRvB.101p5106M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.165106. S2CID 201103600.
  11. ^ Kosterlitz, John Michael (2017-10-09). "Nobel Lecture: Topological defects and phase transitions". Reviews of Modern Physics. 89 (4): 040501. Bibcode:2017RvMP...89d0501K. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.040501.
  12. ^ Wimmer, Martin; Price, Hannah M.; Carusotto, Iacopo; Peschel, Ulf (June 2017). "Experimental measurement of the Berry curvature from anomalous transport". Nature Physics. 13 (6): 545–550. arXiv:1609.09412. Bibcode:2017NatPh..13..545W. doi:10.1038/nphys4050. ISSN 1745-2481. S2CID 119210234.
  13. ^ Duca, L.; Li, T.; Reitter, M.; Bloch, I.; Schleier-Smith, M.; Schneider, U. (2015-01-16). "An Aharonov-Bohm interferometer for determining Bloch band topology". Science. 347 (6219): 288–292. arXiv:1407.5635. Bibcode:2015Sci...347..288D. doi:10.1126/science.1259052. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 25525160. S2CID 9691153.
  14. ^ Price, H. M.; Cooper, N. R. (2012-03-15). "Mapping the Berry curvature from semiclassical dynamics in optical lattices". Physical Review A. 85 (3): 033620. arXiv:1112.5616. Bibcode:2012PhRvA..85c3620P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.033620. S2CID 118479814.
  15. ^ Jotzu, Gregor; Messer, Michael; Desbuquois, Rémi; Lebrat, Martin; Uehlinger, Thomas; Greif, Daniel; Esslinger, Tilman (November 2014). "Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions". Nature. 515 (7526): 237–240. arXiv:1406.7874. Bibcode:2014Natur.515..237J. doi:10.1038/nature13915. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 25391960. S2CID 204898338.