Cylinder set measure

(Redirected from Cylindrical measure)

In mathematics, cylinder set measure (or promeasure, or premeasure, or quasi-measure, or CSM) is a kind of prototype for a measure on an infinite-dimensional vector space. An example is the Gaussian cylinder set measure on Hilbert space.

Cylinder set measures are in general not measures (and in particular need not be countably additive but only finitely additive), but can be used to define measures, such as the classical Wiener measure on the set of continuous paths starting at the origin in Euclidean space.

Definition

edit

There are two equivalent ways to define a cylinder set measure.

One way is to define it directly as a set function on the cylindrical algebra such that certain restrictions on smaller σ-algebras are σ-finite measure. This can also be expressed in terms of a finite-dimensional linear operator.

Let   be a topological vector space over  , denote its algebraic dual as   and let   be a subspace. Then the set function   is a cylinder set measure if for any finite set   the restriction to   is a σ-finite measure. Notice that   is a σ-algebra while   is not.[1][2]

  is the cylindrical algebra defined for two spaces with dual pairing  , i.e. the set of all cylindrical sets

 

for   and  .[3]

Operatic definition

edit

Let   be a real topological vector space. Let   denote the collection of all surjective continuous linear maps   defined on   whose image is some finite-dimensional real vector space  :  

A cylinder set measure on   is a collection of probability measures  

where   is a probability measure on   These measures are required to satisfy the following consistency condition: if   is a surjective projection, then the push forward of the measure is as follows:  

Remarks

edit

The consistency condition   is modelled on the way that true measures push forward (see the section cylinder set measures versus true measures). However, it is important to understand that in the case of cylinder set measures, this is a requirement that is part of the definition, not a result.

A cylinder set measure can be intuitively understood as defining a finitely additive function on the cylinder sets of the topological vector space   The cylinder sets are the pre-images in   of measurable sets in  : if   denotes the  -algebra on   on which   is defined, then  

In practice, one often takes   to be the Borel  -algebra on   In this case, one can show that when   is a separable Banach space, the σ-algebra generated by the cylinder sets is precisely the Borel  -algebra of  :  

Cylinder set measures versus true measures

edit

A cylinder set measure on   is not actually a true measure on  : it is a collection of measures defined on all finite-dimensional images of   If   has a probability measure   already defined on it, then   gives rise to a cylinder set measure on   using the push forward: set  on  

When there is a measure   on   such that   in this way, it is customary to abuse notation slightly and say that the cylinder set measure   "is" the measure  

Cylinder set measures on Hilbert spaces

edit

When the Banach space   is also a Hilbert space   there is a canonical Gaussian cylinder set measure   arising from the inner product structure on   Specifically, if   denotes the inner product on   let   denote the quotient inner product on   The measure   on   is then defined to be the canonical Gaussian measure on  :   where   is an isometry of Hilbert spaces taking the Euclidean inner product on   to the inner product   on   and   is the standard Gaussian measure on  

The canonical Gaussian cylinder set measure on an infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space   does not correspond to a true measure on   The proof is quite simple: the ball of radius   (and center 0) has measure at most equal to that of the ball of radius   in an  -dimensional Hilbert space, and this tends to 0 as   tends to infinity. So the ball of radius   has measure 0; as the Hilbert space is a countable union of such balls it also has measure 0, which is a contradiction. (See infinite dimensional Lebesgue measure.)

An alternative proof that the Gaussian cylinder set measure is not a measure uses the Cameron–Martin theorem and a result on the quasi-invariance of measures. If   really were a measure, then the identity function on   would radonify that measure, thus making   into an abstract Wiener space. By the Cameron–Martin theorem,   would then be quasi-invariant under translation by any element of   which implies that either   is finite-dimensional or that   is the zero measure. In either case, we have a contradiction.

Sazonov's theorem gives conditions under which the push forward of a canonical Gaussian cylinder set measure can be turned into a true measure.

Nuclear spaces and cylinder set measures

edit

A cylinder set measure on the dual of a nuclear Fréchet space automatically extends to a measure if its Fourier transform is continuous.

Example: Let   be the space of Schwartz functions on a finite dimensional vector space; it is nuclear. It is contained in the Hilbert space   of   functions, which is in turn contained in the space of tempered distributions   the dual of the nuclear Fréchet space  :  

The Gaussian cylinder set measure on   gives a cylinder set measure on the space of tempered distributions, which extends to a measure on the space of tempered distributions,  

The Hilbert space   has measure 0 in   by the first argument used above to show that the canonical Gaussian cylinder set measure on   does not extend to a measure on  

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Bogachev, Vladimir (1998). Gaussian Measures. Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.
  2. ^ N. Vakhania, V. Tarieladze and S. Chobanyan (1987). Probability Distributions on Banach Spaces. Mathematics and its Applications. Springer Netherlands. p. 390. ISBN 9789027724960. LCCN 87004931.
  3. ^ N. Vakhania, V. Tarieladze and S. Chobanyan (1987). Probability Distributions on Banach Spaces. Mathematics and its Applications. Springer Netherlands. p. 4. ISBN 9789027724960. LCCN 87004931.