| Submission rejected on 29 November 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Bonadea 26 hours ago. Last edited by Bonadea 10 hours ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 29 November 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bonadea 28 hours ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 29 November 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bonadea 28 hours ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 November 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 28 hours ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 November 2024 by Jamiebuba (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Jamiebuba 30 hours ago. | |
Comment: I have searched the WaPo online archives and find no article written by Paul James (or James Paul), no article called "Fabulous", and nothing that seems likely in the list of articles published on 26 June. Same thing with ToI. And in neither publication is there anything about Era Joshi, however much you search. bonadea contributions talk 10:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: A link to the main website of a publication, for instance Hindustan Times, is not a source. If you want to use an article in Hindustan Times as a source for information in a draft, you have to provide at least the date of publication, the article title, and the name of the article's author. If possible, it is good to include a link, but it has to point to the actual article, not just to the main page for the publication. bonadea contributions talk 17:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: To show notability, there has to be multiple sources that meet the criteria described here. The draft doesn't tell us how or why she is notable, so even if there were sources, this draft could not be accepted until there was some information about her, all of it sourced to reliable, independent sources.If this is resubmitted yet another time without any sources that meet the criteria, it may be rejected with no option to resubmit. bonadea contributions talk 17:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There are two references: a link to artellsmagazine.com and a link to quadromagazine.com. Neither mentions Era Joshi.Simply having a job (such as a modelling job) does not make a person notable. bonadea contributions talk 16:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Era Joshi is a fashion model. She has worked with a Makeup Artist in Rajasthan, India. The model got published in Artells Magazine. She also made headlines in The Times Of India and The Washington Post.
Era Joshi is a fashion model. She has worked with a Makeup Artist in Rajasthan, India. The model also got published in Artells Magazine.