Dr. Henry Franz Pulitzer (1899–1979) was an Austrian-born gallery owner and "avid art collector",[1][2] and connoisseur, described by one source as a "media mogul".[3] He was the owner of the Pulitzer galleries in London and Bern, Switzerland, and of the Isleworth Mona Lisa, a painting famous for the claim passed down from its previous owners that there was evidence that it was painted by Leonardo da Vinci. Pulitzer himself took up the cause of proving the claimed provenance of the painting, including writing a book in support of it, but his efforts did not lead to acceptance of the claim during his lifetime.
Henry F. Pulitzer | |
|---|---|
 Pulitzer in 1962 | |
| Born | 1899 |
| Died | 1979 (aged 79–80) |
| Occupation(s) | Art collector Gallery owner |
| Years active | 1950s–1970s |
Biography
editBorn in Vienna,[4] then within Austria-Hungary, Pulitzer recalled developing a love of art at an early age, particularly remembering having a "passionate adoration of a Dombrovsky that had been relegated to his room", and disliking occasions in which his family would move it to the great hall for state occasions.[5] Pulitzer was at one time "a gentleman-in-waiting" at the court of Zog I of Albania.[6][7][8][9] In 1936, he attended a display at the Leicester Galleries, at which he first saw the painting known as the Isleworth Mona Lisa, then owned by English art collector Hugh Blaker, with Pulitzer later describing that as the point at which he had "fallen in love with it".[1] In 1949, Pulitzer applied to the Home Secretary for naturalisation in the United Kingdom.[10]
By the 1950s, Pulitzer had become the proprietor of the Pulitzer Gallery and the Pulitzer Studio at Kensington High Street in London. A 1953 Advertiser's Weekly article noted that "Pulitzer Studios of Kensington are the other 'all colour' firm" in the advertising field",[11] and described a "teaming-up of Eugene Vernier, the outstanding French fashion photographer, with Dr. Henry F. Pulitzer, who, in recent years, has done much technical development work in colour and other fields".[11] The piece also noted that Pulitzer's studio offered "a useful studio set construction unit".[11] Pulitzer, however, became increasingly noted for his art collection. A 1958 display of watercolor paintings selected by Pulitzer drew attention,[12] as did a 1959 display of "Minor English Masters",[13] and later in 1959, he discovered "a fine specimen" of a rare painting by Caspar Netscher, "showing a shepherd and shepherdess in a sylvan setting with a sculptured group of a nymph, centaur and cupid in the background".[14]
A 1962 account described Pulitzer as a connoisseur and art dealer in London and Bern.[5] Pulitzer expressed strong opinions on the state of the art world, attributing the high price of classical art to the opinion that "no truly great art has been painted recently", and dismissing abstract paintings as "things that can be hung any one of four ways without making a difference".[5] On December 7, 1962, he made news when he reported the theft of a painting by Borgognone that was shipped from London to Phoenix, Arizona, intended as a gift for the Phoenix Art Museum.[15] The painting was shipped in a box with another larger painting, by Desportes, but when the box was opened, only the Desportes was found. Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated the disappearance,[16] and found the missing Borgognone the next day in the same box, "under piles of excelsior".[17] By February 1963, Pulitzer recounted making a trip to Phoenix, Arizona "intending to stay for three days" before leaving for California, but instead staying for three months out of fascination with the artwork that had been collected locally, noting for example "a magnificent terracotta by Andrea della Robbia, covering a whole wall specially built to house it" some miles from Scottsdale.[18]
A 1969 account lamenting the tendency of art dealers to break up collections noted:
There is, however, at least in London, Dr. Henry Pulitzer, whose Pulitzer Gallery is in Kensington High Street, just by the Royal Garden Hotel, has for some years been amassing a collection of pictures on the theme of the "Temptation of St. Anthony." This remarkable lot of varying versions of the sins of the flesh is well worth seeing, but although Dr. Pulitzer too has been sorely tempted to sell individual items, like St. Anthony he has resisted and the collection remains intact, to be sold as a lot.[19]
In 1979, Ronald Hambleton acknowledged Pulitzer for providing details about a painting by Hieronymus Bosch previously incorrectly attributed to Herri met de Bles.[20]
Advocacy of the Isleworth Mona Lisa
editIn 1962, Pulitzer purchased the Isleworth Mona Lisa from Blaker,[21][22][1] acquiring it from the Blaker estate by selling his own Kensington estate and all its contents. Blaker and his father-in-law John R. Eyre had previously asserted that the work was painted by Leonardo da Vinci, and had gained some support for this claim through examination by experts including Paul George Konody,[23] Archibald Cecil Chappelow,[24] Arduino Colasanti,[25] and Adolfo Venturi.[25]
Pulitzer wrote and published a book, Where is the Mona Lisa? in 1966, presenting the case that the Isleworth Mona Lisa was the unfinished portrait of Lisa del Giocondo by Leonardo da Vinci, and that the Mona Lisa in the Louvre was a copy of this work.[26][27] Art historian Jean-Pierre Isbouts asserts of Pulitzer that despite his success as a publisher he was "not a very talented author", concluding that "[h]is unfortunate 1966 book about the painting, filled with uppercase screeds... did far more harm than good, and ensured that no self-respecting art historian would go near the work".[1]
Around the same time, Lord Brownlow also claimed to have a version of the Mona Lisa that was original to da Vinci.[28] Brownlow and Pulitzer genially disputed who had the "real" Mona Lisa in the press,[28] and both offered to show their respective Mona Lisa paintings at a London exhibition in 1972.[6][7] Pulitzer continued to press his belief in the authenticity of the Isleworth Mona Lisa in the 1970s.[29] Martin Kemp, a skeptic with respect to the origin of the Isleworth Mona Lisa, nevertheless noted that he "enjoyed a short correspondence with Pulitzer during the 1970s, by which time the Pulitzer Gallery in London was no longer in business", and that Pulitzer had sent Kemp a photograph of the painting.[30]
Personal life and death
editIn his later years, Pulitzer was described as living "in a fortress-like flat, guarded by a plethora of electronic devices, in Kensington High Street".[28] He died in 1979,[1] leaving the Isleworth Mona Lisa to his girlfriend in his will. It then spent decades in the vault of a Swiss bank, from which it emerged to renewed attention in the art world and in the media in the 2010s.[21]
References
edit- ^ a b c d e Jean-Pierre Isbouts, The Mona Lisa Myth (Pantheon Press, 2013), pp. 86–87.
- ^ Wright, Tom (14 January 2015). "A Second Mona Lisa? Science Offers Few Clues". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
- ^ Zeit Online GmbH (2011-06-16). "Kunstmarkt: Sie lächelt, als wär sie es wirklich | Zeit Online". Die Zeit. Zeit.de. Retrieved 2013-12-08.
- ^ Fred Coleman, "Real 'Mona Lisa' is at Louvre, says Clark", Appleton Sunday Post-Crescent (January 28, 1973), E-8.
- ^ a b c Maggie Savoy, "Contemporary Art Neglected", The Arizona Republic (November 4, 1962), p. F-5.
- ^ a b "The World", The New York Times (October 22, 1972), p. E-4.
- ^ a b Raymond R. Coffey, "Does Mona Lisa Know", Charleston Daily Mail (October 17, 1972), p. 9A, via the Chicago Daily News.
- ^ "Which Mona has smile that art lovers love", The Dayton Journal Herald (October 21, 1972), p. 7.
- ^ Arthur Veysey, "Mona, Honey, Why Are you Smiling?", Chicago Tribune (October 23, 1972), Sec. 2, p. 20.
- ^ "Notice", The Kensington News and West London Times (February 11, 1949), p. 2.
- ^ a b c John Heron, "The Old Virtues Speak Loudest", § Photography in Advertising, Advertiser's Weekly (October 1, 1953), p. 40, 44.
- ^ John Wright, "The Romantics in the High Street", The Kensington News and West London Times (December 12, 1958), p. 8.
- ^ "Minor Masters", The Kensington News and West London Times (March 13, 1959), p. 5.
- ^ Adrian Bury, "Round about the Galleries", in The Connoisseur: An Illustrated Magazine for Collectors (September 1959), vol. 144, p. 53.
- ^ "Valuable Painting Reported Stolen", Arizona Daily Star (December 7, 1962), p. 1.
- ^ Robert S. Diamond, "Costly Art Treasure Lost Between Douglas, Phoenix", The Arizona Republic (December 7, 1962), p. 23.
- ^ "Painting Is Found", The Kansas City Times (December 08, 1962), p. 24.
- ^ Henry F. Pulitzer, "Art Lover's Notebook", Arizona Republic (February 24, 1963), p. 48.
- ^ Investors Chronicle and Stock Exchange Gazette (1969), vol. 9, p. 157.
- ^ Ronald Hambleton, The Love & Death of Orpheus (1979), p. 192.
- ^ a b Brooks, Richard (23 September 2012). "Earlier Mona Lisa shows her face". Times of London. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
- ^ "London's Monad". Monalogue.org. Retrieved 2013-12-08.
- ^ Paul George Konody, "Another 'Mona Lisa' Found in London?", The New York Times (15 February 1914), p. 25.
- ^ Chappelow, A. C. (July 1, 1956). "The Isleworth Mona Lisa". Apollo Magazine. p. 28.
- ^ a b John R. Eyre, The Two Mona Lisas: Which was Giacondo's Picture? (J.M. Ouseley and Son, 1923), pp. 34–35.
- ^ Terence Mullaly, "'Mona Lisa painting' in bank vault", The Daily Telegraph (January 20, 1967), p. 18.
- ^ Henry F. Pulitzer, Where is the Mona Lisa (1966).
- ^ a b c Chris Pritchard, "France said 'non'–so Britain finds another Mona Lisa", The Sydney Morning Herald (October 22, 1972), p. 62.
- ^ Robin Adams Sloan, "Hemingway Bet On", Middletown Times Herald Record (October 22, 1972), p. 86: Q: Is it true that a London art dealer claims to own the original Mona Lisa? A: Yes, and dealer Dr. Henry Pulitzer has spent the last decade trying to get his version authenticated. Leonardo Da Vinci often did three or four versions of the same painting. The Pulitzer oil has the same tantalizing smile, but seems to represent a younger, fresher Mona Lisa. Many art scholars, including some at the Louvre, believe this portrait is the original and best version.
- ^ Martin Kemp, Living with Leonardo: Fifty Years of Sanity and Insanity in the Art World and Beyond (2018), p. 133.