In mathematics, in particular algebraic geometry, Hurwitz spaces are moduli spaces of ramified covers of the projective line, and they are related to the moduli of curves. Their rational points are of interest for the study of the inverse Galois problem, and as such they have been extensively studied by arithmetic geometers. More precisely, Hurwitz spaces classify isomorphism classes of Galois covers with a given automorphism group and a specified number of branch points. The monodromy conjugacy classes at each branch point are also commonly fixed. These spaces have been introduced by Adolf Hurwitz[1] which (with Alfred Clebsch and Jacob Lüroth) showed the connectedness of the Hurwitz spaces in the case of simply branched covers (i.e., the case where is a symmetric group and the monodromy classes are the conjugacy class of transpositions).

Motivation

edit

Let   be a finite group. The inverse Galois problem for   asks whether there exists a finite Galois extension   whose Galois group is isomorphic to  . By Hilbert's irreducibility theorem, a positive answer to this question may be deduced from the existence, instead, of a finite Galois extension   with Galois group  . In other words, one may try to find a connected ramified Galois cover of the projective line   over   whose automorphism group is  . If one requires that this cover be geometrically connected, that is  , then this stronger form of the inverse Galois problem is called the regular inverse Galois problem.

A motivation for constructing a moduli space of  -covers (i.e., geometrically connected Galois covers of   whose automorphism group is  ) is to transform the regular inverse Galois problem into a problem of Diophantine geometry: if (geometric) points of the moduli spaces correspond to  -covers (or extensions of   with Galois group  ) then it is expected that rational points are related to regular extensions of   with Galois group  .

This geometric approach, pioneered by John G. Thompson, Michael D. Fried, Gunter Malle and Wolfgang Matzat,[2] has been key to the realization of 25 of the 26 sporadic groups as Galois groups over   — the only remaining sporadic group left to realize being the Mathieu group M23.

Definitions

edit

Configuration spaces

edit

Let   be a finite group and   be a fixed integer. A configuration is an unordered list of   distincts points of  . Configurations form a topological space: the configuration space   of   points. This space is the analytification (see GAGA) of an algebraic scheme  , which is the open subvariety of   obtained by removing the closed subset corresponding to the vanishing of the discriminant.

The fundamental group of the (topological) configuration space   is the Artin braid group  , generated by elementary braids   subject to the braid relations (  and   commute if  , and  ). The configuration space has the homotopy type of an Eilenberg–MacLane space  .[3][4]

G-covers and monodromy conjugacy classes

edit

A  -cover of   ramified at a configuration   is a triple   where   is a connected topological space,   is a covering map which does not extend into a cover of   where   is a configuration with less than   points, and   is a group isomorphism  . Up to isomorphism, a  -cover is determined by its monodromy morphism, which is a conjugacy class of group homomorphisms  .

One may choose a generating set of the fundamental group   consisting of homotopy classes of loops  , each rotating once counterclockwise around each branch point, and satisfying the relation  . Such a choice induces a correspondence between  -covers and conjugacy classes of tuples   satisfying   and such that   generate  : here,   is the image of the loop   under the monodromy morphism.

The conjugacy classes of   containing the elements   do not depend on the choice of the loops  . They are the monodromy conjugacy classes of a given  -cover. We denote by   the set of  -tuples   of elements of   satisfying   and generating  . If   is a list of conjugacy classes of  , then   is the set of such tuples with the additional constraint  .

Hurwitz spaces

edit

Topologically, the Hurwitz space classifying  -covers with   branch points is an unramified cover of the configuration space   whose fiber above a configuration   is in bijection, via the choice of a generating set of loops in  , with the quotient   of   by the conjugacy action of  . Two points in the fiber are in the same connected component if they are represented by tuples which are in the same orbit for the action of the braid group   induced by the following formula: 

This topological space may be constructed as the Borel construction  :[5][6] its homotopy type is given by  , where   is the universal cover   of the configuration space  , and the action of the braid group   on   is as above.

Using GAGA results, one shows that space is the analyfication of a complex scheme, and that scheme is shown to be obtained via extension of scalars of a  -scheme   by a descent criterion of Weil.[7][8] The scheme   is an étale cover of the algebraic configuration space  . However, it is not a fine moduli space in general.

In what follows, we assume that   is centerless, in which case   is a fine moduli space. Then, for any field   of characteristic relatively prime to  ,  -points of   correspond bijectively to geometrically connected  -covers of   (i.e., regular Galois extensions of   with Galois group  ) which are unramified outside   points. The absolute Galois group of   acts on the  -points of the scheme  , and the fixed points of this action are precisely its  -points, which in this case correspond to regular extensions of   with Galois group  , unramified outside   places.

Applications

edit

The rigidity method

edit

If conjugacy classes   are given, the list   is rigid when there is a tuple   unique up to conjugacy such that   and   generate   — in other words,   is a singleton (see also rigid group). The conjugacy classes   are rational if for any element   and any integer   relatively prime to the order of  , the element   belongs to  .

Assume   is a centerless group, and fix a rigid list of rational conjugacy classes  . Since the classes   are rational, the action of the absolute Galois group   on a  -cover with monodromy conjugacy classes   is (another)  -cover with monodromy conjugacy classes   (this is an application of Fried's branch cycle lemma[9]). As a consequence, one may define a subscheme   of   consisting of  -covers whose monodromy conjugacy classes are  .

Take a configuration  . If the points of this configuration are not globally rational, then the action of   on  -covers ramified at   will not preserve the ramification locus. However, if   is a configuration defined over   (for example, all points of the configuration are in  ), then a  -cover branched at   is mapped by an element of   to another  -cover branched at  , i.e. another element of the fiber. The fiber of   above   is in bijection with  , which is a singleton by the rigidity hypothesis. Hence, the single point in the fiber is necessarily invariant under the  -action, and it defines a  -cover defined over  .

This proves a theorem due to Thompson: if there exists a rigid list of rational conjugacy classes of  , and  , then   is a Galois group over  . This has been applied to the Monster group, for which a rigid triple of conjugacy classes   (with elements of respective orders 2, 3, and 29) exists.

Thompson's proof does not explicitly use Hurwitz spaces (this rereading is due to Fried), but more sophisticated variants of the rigidity method (used for other sporadic groups) are best understood using moduli spaces. These methods involve defining a curve inside a Hurwitz space — obtained by fixing all branch points except one — and then applying standard methods used to find rational points on algebraic curves, notably the computation of their genus using the Riemann-Hurwitz formula.[2]

Statistics of extensions of function fields over finite fields

edit

Several conjectures concern the asymptotical distribution of field extensions of a given base field as the discriminant gets larger. Such conjectures include the Cohen-Lenstra heuristics and the Malle conjecture.

When the base field is a function field over a finite field  , where   and   does not divide the order of the group  , the count of extensions of   with Galois group   is linked with the count of  -points on Hurwitz spaces. This approach was highlighted by works of Jordan Ellenberg, Akshay Venkatesh, Craig Westerland and TriThang Tran.[10][6][11][12] Their strategy to count  -points on Hurwitz spaces, for large values of  , is to compute the homology of the Hurwitz spaces, which reduces to purely topological questions (approached with combinatorial means), and to use the Grothendieck trace formula and Deligne's estimations of eigenvalues of Frobenius (as explained in the article about Weil conjectures).

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Hurwitz, A. (1891-03-01). "Ueber Riemann'sche Flächen mit gegebenen Verzweigungspunkten". Mathematische Annalen (in German). 39 (1): 1–60. doi:10.1007/BF01199469. ISSN 1432-1807. S2CID 123053696.
  2. ^ a b Malle, Gunter; Matzat, B. Heinrich (1999). Inverse Galois Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12123-8. ISBN 978-3-642-08311-2.
  3. ^ Fadell, Edward; Neuwirth, Lee (1962-06-01). "Configuration Spaces". Mathematica Scandinavica. 10: 111. doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-10517. ISSN 1903-1807.
  4. ^ Fox, R.; Neuwirth, L. (1962-06-01). "The Braid Groups". Mathematica Scandinavica. 10: 119. doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-10518. ISSN 1903-1807.
  5. ^ Randal-Williams, Oscar (2019-06-18). "Homology of Hurwitz spaces and the Cohen--Lenstra heuristic for function fields (after Ellenberg, Venkatesh, and Westerland)". arXiv:1906.07447 [math.NT].
  6. ^ a b Ellenberg, Jordan S.; Venkatesh, Akshay; Westerland, Craig (2015-12-01). "Homological stability for Hurwitz spaces and the Cohen-Lenstra conjecture over function fields". arXiv:0912.0325 [math.NT].
  7. ^ "Hurwitz spaces | Société Mathématique de France". smf.emath.fr. Retrieved 2023-04-25.
  8. ^ Dèbes, Pierre. "Arithmétique et espaces de modules de revêtements" (PDF).
  9. ^ Fried, Michael. "The Branch Cycle Lemma".
  10. ^ Ellenberg, Jordan S.; Venkatesh, Akshay (2005), Bogomolov, Fedor; Tschinkel, Yuri (eds.), "Counting extensions of function fields with bounded discriminant and specified Galois group", Geometric Methods in Algebra and Number Theory, Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, pp. 151–168, doi:10.1007/0-8176-4417-2_7, ISBN 978-0-8176-4417-8, retrieved 2023-04-25
  11. ^ Ellenberg, Jordan S.; Venkatesh, Akshay; Westerland, Craig (2013-11-19). "Homological stability for Hurwitz spaces and the Cohen-Lenstra conjecture over function fields, II". arXiv:1212.0923 [math.NT].
  12. ^ Ellenberg, Jordan S.; Tran, TriThang; Westerland, Craig (2023-03-05). "Fox-Neuwirth-Fuks cells, quantum shuffle algebras, and Malle's conjecture for function fields". arXiv:1701.04541 [math.NT].