Wikipedia

Peatland restoration

(Redirected from Draft:Peatland restoration)

Peatland restoration is a term describing measures to restore the original form and function of peatlands, or wet peat-rich areas.[1][2] This landscape globally occupies 400 million hectares or 3% of land surface on Earth.[3][4] Historically, peatlands have been drained for several main reasons; peat extraction, creation of agricultural land, and forestry usage. However, this activity has caused degradation affecting this landscape's structure through damage to habitats, hydrology, nutrients cycle, carbon balance and more.

Due to peat formation, peatlands are carbon-rich and noted as carbon sinks. It has been projected that climate change, such as increased temperature and alterations of precipitation, affecting these landscapes under current status could increase releases of greenhouse gases (GHGs).[5] Climate projections indicate increased probability and intensity of weather events, which can increase risk of fires and additional GHG release. Peatlands home a variety of native flora and fauna put at risk by projected degradation from climatic or anthropogenic alternation, placing emphasis and need for restoration efforts. Policy for restoration is in action. In June 2002, the United Nations Development Programme launched its Wetland and Ecosystem and Tropical Peat Swamp Forest Rehabilitation Project and in November the International Peatland Society formed, which promotes restoration and balance of demands on peatlands.

Map of Global Peatland Distribution, Concentration and Location.

Peatland restoration emphasises the reduction of GHG emissions to slow the effects of climate change. With discussion circulating on human impacts of damage from draining and clearing the landscape. As a result, restoration would involve balancing usage of peatlands for human needs and needs of the natural ecosystems. Presently, main methods of restoration circulate on re-wetting, restoring forestry, localised paludiculture and adaption of anthropogenic usage of peatlands.

Targets of restoration

edit

Climate change mitigation and adaptation

edit
 
Book on wetland conservation by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1994.

Peatlands store carbon from dead plants and hence help mitigate climate change. However, draining and degrading peatlands release large amounts of greenhouse gases. Rewetting and restoring peatlands can significantly reduce these emissions by raising water tables which slower down the plant decomposition.[6] The resulting anaerobic decomposition produces the greenhouse gas methane, but since methane does not remain in the atmosphere as long as other GHGs, the net effect on the climate is likely cooling if a long time frame is considered (decades). The strength of this effect varies between different kinds of peatland, but it is generally most significant in tropical and agricultural peatlands.[7] A raised water table also results in a local direct cooling effect, moist vegetation and soil has a higher thermal conductivity and therefore solar radiation is rather used for evapotranspiration than warming the surface.[7]

Water

edit

The goals of peatland restoration in hydrological terms are primarily to improve the quality and regulate the quantity of water. A peatland as an intact ecosystem is a natural water purifier, it filters and stores organic substances, metals or other toxic matter and retains nutrients.[8] These pollutants are stored in the peat for long periods of time, improving the quality of drinking water.[8] The concept of peatlands regulating water quantity has often been compared to the way of a "sponge" works,[9] in times of high availability of water (periods of rainfall) it is sucked up and stored and afterwards, in times of less precipitation, slowly released to the environment.[8] Furthermore, as the water level rises, the risk of peat fire decreases.[10]

Biodiversity

edit

In some instances, peatlands may exhibit a comparatively lower number of species.[7] However, in the same biogeographic zone as dryland ecosystems, peatlands contain a greater percentage of specialized and distinctive species.[7] Due to the isolation and heterogeneity of their habitats, peatlands harbor significant populations of endangered and rare species, many of which are unique to peatland environments, and play a role for the conservation of genetic diversity.[7] Restoration seeks to counteract the process of habitat deterioration, which represents the most significant risk to biodiversity.[11] In drained sites there is a tendency for plant diversity to decrease, with mosses (including Sphagnum) facing difficulties in recolonizing such areas.[12] This could be attributed to the hydrological alterations, as well as the loss of the initial soil characteristics.[12]

Restoration effects on the natural environment

edit

Carbon balance

edit

Due to the formation of peat developing from partial decomposition of vegetation material, there is a high quantity of carbon within this landscape. As a result, peatlands can be seen as a carbon storage.[4] Carbon fluctuations are dominantly impacted by local hydrology within a peatland.[13]

However, these processes are interrupted by anthropogenic usage of peatlands. Peat extractions cause destabilisation of local ecosystems through physical landscape damage of digging, draining and isolation through habitat fragmentation. As a result of drainage and temperature increase, peatlands are becoming drier, which increases the likelihood of severe fires and the risk of larger carbon dioxide emissions.[14][15]

Climate regulation

edit

Climatic regulation is key to monitored for peatland restoration. Due to the water-logged nature of this environment, consistent seasonality and fluctuations, are essential to restoring stability and protecting pristine peatlands. Climatic change of variables, such as precipitation and temperature, threaten significant factors mostly namely that of hydrology (due to its immediate effects on microbial decomposition within the soil).[2][13]

Beyond climatic events on peatlands, their restoration offers climatic benefits also. Peatland restoration is noted for significantly reducing air temperature compared to neighbouring agricultural land.[16] This finding offers peatland restoration as a positive step to combat climate change.

Nutrients

edit

Peat in general is poor in nutrients and due to its constantly condition of being waterlogged, it has a limited nutrient cycle.[17] Peatlands that have been degraded and used for agriculture, typically have high nutrient levels. Restoring these areas with surface water, which is also relatively nutrient-rich, leads to nutrient overload. To properly restore these peatlands, excess nutrients must be removed. One expensive but effective way is to remove the top layer before restoration and another option is to use paludiculture to remove nutrients over time.[7] Due to peatlands special Flora and Fauna a failure to remove excess nutrients can result in low biodiversity in affected peatlands.[7] However, a study showed that after the restoration of peatlands, the original concentrations of mineral elements such as Kalium and Calcium was restored.[18]

Hydrology

edit

Recent initiatives on peatland restoration showed, that they help preventing and mitigating floodings in specific areas and under specific conditions. This happens within two particular effects. First by sucking up water and second through temporary surface-storage. When peat sucks up water, the groundwater level elevates and captures the rainwater, this is then only released by evapotranspiration, as the water does not flow down the rivers into the sea, but stays in the peatland, it too reduces the propability of droughts.[19] In the temporary surface-storage effect the vegetation acts as a barrier to the water runoff and thus delays it although the netflow of water stays the same, but the time expands and hence the flow rate is reduced.[19] This is a crucial point in flood prevention.

Soil regulation

edit

Peatland as an ecosystem is important for regulating soil quality. When the peat covering Sphagnum layer is degraded, the remaining bare peat soil releases sediment to water streams, which pollutes and reduces biodiversity of rivers and water reservoirs.[20] Additionally trough wind and water erosion carbon can be released if the peat is blank.[21] Hence a dense Sphagnum covering is important for soil regulation, as it can improve the physical, chemical, and biological flows and properties that allow soils to buffer, filter, and transform chemical substances.[22]

 
Flat-topped bogmoss (Sphagnum fallax).
 
The broadleaf cattail plant (Typha latifolia)

Biological diversity

edit
See also: Biodiversity and Biodiversity loss

Plant life

edit

Restoration efforts can cause alterations in the hydrology of the system, resulting in hydrological conditions that are more advantageous for the recolonization of Sphagnum mosses.[23] Restoration can also lead to the successful succession of plant communities towards a targeted peatland vegetation by decreasing the abundance of species benefiting from drainage.[18] However, the restoration process may not always result in the full re-introduction of pristine peatland species.[18]

The rewetting of drained fen peatlands can lead to the growth of tall graminoid wetland plants, such as Common reed (Phragmites australis) and Broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia), which can become the dominant vegetation for many years to decades.[24] This can cause lasting changes to the biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and land cover characteristics of the area, particularly in terms of geochemistry and hydrology.[24][25]

 
The yellow-winged darter dragonfly (Sympetrum flaveolum). Its breeding is confined to stagnant water, usually in peat bogs.

Animal life

edit

In restored areas, the recovery of animal species is more likely to be affected by the resulting variation in environmental conditions, compared to plant species.[7] Animal species have different requirements, and many of them need specific combinations of conditions, making them more sensitive to environmental changes.[7] The ability of species to disperse and the proximity of source populations in undamaged peatlands are crucial factors that contribute to the recolonization of animal species in restored areas.[7]

Of insects, Odonata species are negatively impacted by drainage.[26] However, according to a study in Finland, after the peatland restoration they tend to benefit and can colonize new water pools in just three years.[26] Compared to the pristine sites, the drained sites had fewer Odonata species and lower abundance.[26]

 
European golden plover (Pluvialis apricaria).

A study in Finland revealed that the composition of bird communities in restored areas is different from those in pristine areas and many bird species found in the restored peatlands are generalist in nature.[27] To assess the recovery of specialized bird species in peatlands and bird communities in general, long-term monitoring is necessary.[27]

A major peatland restoration project took place in Snowdonia (Eryri), Wales, where an upland farm witnessed the return of rare bird species after two decades of absence.[28] During the summer of 2021, European golden plover (Pluvialis apricaria) and Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata) successfully bred in the rewetted habitats, and chicks sightings were recorded for both species.[28] This is the first case of successful breeding at this site since the 1990s.[28]

Fungi and others

edit

The impact of disturbance and restoration on microbial communities is not completely clear.[7] However, it has been observed that after disturbance in a bog, certain microbial communities were replaced by more broadly distributed species.[7] After restoring the moisture levels of peat soil, non-mycorrhizal species increased while obligatory mycorrhizal species decreased.[7] However, the proportion of non-mycorrhizal species found in undisturbed natural peatland was not achieved.[7] The microbiome can recover from the negative effects of drainage through the process of rewetting.[7][29] But even with this considerable improvement, the microbial community could only attain a similarity to undrained areas when the soil organic matter content was over 70%, indicating a soil that is not highly degraded.[7][29]

 
Forsinard Flows National Nature Reserve, in northern Scotland.

Studies conducted at Forsinard Flows, a natural reserve now undergoing large-scale peatland restoration, show that between 1998 and 2016:[30]

  • The abundance of fungal families that contain ericoid mycorrhizal species increased over time.[30]
  • A reduction in the presence of Tylospora (and other Atheliaceae species), which are ectomycorrhizal fungi, suggesting a recovery of the microbial community structure towards that of natural peatlands.[30]
  • The abundance and species richness of Auchenorrhyncha, (leafhoppers, and others) was considerably greater in peatland samples than in forest floor samples.[30] The response in areas undergoing restoration was intermediate between the two.[30]
  • Moth abundance was highest in forest but species richness was highest in restoration areas.[30]

Restoration effects on society

edit

Economy

edit

In the United Kingdom, research conducted to assess the value that society places on the benefits of peatland restoration found that restoring 20% of Scotland's peatland would result in economic benefits estimated at between £80 and £336 million per year.[20] A subsequent study found that if peatland restoration took place by 2027, it would provide £191 million of economic benefits annually for the country, net of restoration costs.[20] Delaying peatland restoration until 2039–2050 would lead to a significant loss of economic benefits to society.[20]

Addressing health risks

edit

Fires and toxic haze

edit
 
Extinguishing a fire in a peatland.

Peatland degradation, through exposure and increased dryness of landscapes, increases risks of fire. Peatland fires (dominantly caused by deforestation, human error or exposure) has led to immediate and longterm effects.[31] Primarily, immediate risks of death and loss of land. Secondly, the effect of hazes or smoke from fires can create longterm health impacts, particularly respiratory issues.[14][32] Tackling effects of fires and assisting peatland stability and restoration assist human health and lives as well as reducing habitat fragmentation and assisting recovery of ecosystems and plant within these landscape.

Restoration of peatlands could address the above impacts through creation of policy and/or adjusting use of the landscape, to protect and therefore reduce event occupancy of fires.[33] Assisting stabilisation of this landscape could offer communities reassurance from risk while strengthening peatland ecosystems.[14]

 
Castor bean tick (Ixodes ricinus), disease vector for Lyme disease.

Regulating pests and diseases

edit

The process of converting forests into open peatlands will result in modifications to the water table, vegetation, and the communities of vertebrates that serve as hosts for ticks, particularly the Castor bean tick (Ixodes ricinus).[30] These ticks can carry various disease-causing pathogens, including the Borrelia burgdorferi bacterium that is responsible for Lyme disease.[30]

In a study conducted in Forsinard Flows, Scotland the restoration process resulted in a progressive decline in the number of ticks.[30] The tick density was higher in recently felled areas than in older felled areas, declining over time.[30] After 13 years of restoration, the tick densities were almost as low as in areas that were undamaged.[30]

The surveys of host abundance that were conducted to determine the reason behind the low density of ticks in blanket bog revealed that deer, the main hosts for ticks in Scotland, preferred forest and felled areas instead of open blanket bog.[30] The presence of a dense forest canopy creates a favorable environment for tick activity and survival, and thus there were likely more ticks in forestry than in felled areas.[30]

Approaches to restoration

edit

Methods and techniques

edit

Peatland restoration activities are site-specific and may call for a mixture of actions, depending on the initial conditions.[34]

Rewetting

edit
 
Plastic sheet piling dam on Edale Moor, England.

Rewetting involves returning a degraded peatland to its original waterlogged conditions, which are critical to restoring peat-forming vegetation and suppressing aerobic microbial metabolism and enzyme activity.[29] By doing so, favorable conditions can be created for renewed peat accumulation, ultimately aiding in the peatland's restoration.[29] The purpose of rewetting is to preserve soil moisture and decrease the rate of drainage, achieved by blocking and filling canals, and digging deep wells.[35]

  • Peat-dams are artificial barriers constructed from soil material, which are intended to block the flow of water in channels or gullies.[36] The construction of these dams involves the use of unoxidized peat, which is highly stable, impermeable, and resistant to erosion.[36] The process involves taking peat from the channel bottom, flipping it, and repositioning it slightly downstream from its original location to create a blockage.[36] Additional peat material is used to build the dam, it can be obtained either from within the gully or from a separate borrow pit.[36]
  • Plastic dams are barriers made of interlocking sheets of impermeable plastic piling that are used to block gullies.[37] They are capable of holding large volumes of water, which can result in the formation of deep pools.[37] Their effectiveness depends on proper spacing, as incorrect spacing can lead to the failure of one or more dams.[37] Plastic dams are only effective when placed on top of peat rather than mineral soil.[37]
  • Coir logs made from imported coconut husks and held in place by wooden stakes are also used to slow water flows and reduce erosion.[38] Wool logs are also being trialled for the same purpose at Fleet Moss in the Yorkshire Dales and at sites in the North York Moors.[39] This technique has the dual benefit of reducing the need to import coconut husks transported over long distances,[39] and potentially regenerating a market for local fleeces.[40] The method involves tightly packing wool into felt tubes[41] and is also being used alongside tried-and-tested methods by the South West Peatland Partnership on Dartmoor.[41]

Revegetation

edit
Main article: Revegetation

Restoration efforts in peatland ecosystems involve the implementation of measures to recover the original vegetation cover, species richness, and local abundance through replanting activities on peatlands.[35] Replanting activities in peatland ecosystems serve multiple objectives, such as introducing native and adapted plant species in open peatlands, enhancing degraded peat forest areas through enrichment planting, and using seed dispersal techniques to promote the regeneration of peatland vegetation.[35]

 
Experiment on Cattail (Typha) paludiculture in Germany.

Paludiculture

edit
Main article: Paludiculture

Paludiculture is a form of rewetting drained peatlands while it is further used for agriculture.[42] The idea is to regenerate wet peatlands and increase the water table to get the peatland-ecosystem back to work, which stores high amounts of carbon. A main benefit is, that the land is used in two ways, as carbon sinks (peat) and for agricultural purposes. Based on different types of peatlands and regional reservation restrictions there are different forms of agriculture recommended.[43] Among potential crops and usages are different kinds of berries, herbs, timber and biomass for biofuel.

Safeguard remaining 'pristine' peatlands

edit

Opportunity of restoring damaged anthropogenically used peatlands is key. However, there are peatlands unmapped as well as pristine peatlands globally. Protection and policy remains centred on reduces damages and restoring peatlands currently damaged. However, there is little policy to protect currently pristine peatlands. One method of restoration is to prevent damage from furthering or beginning. Which could be initiated through policy to help support goals or protecting and restoring peatland areas.[3]

International efforts and initiatives

edit

Paris Agreement

edit
Main article: Paris Agreement

Meeting the requirements of the Paris Agreement calls for carbon neutrality by 2050–2070, achieving this target entails rewetting 500,000 km2 of drained peatlands at an average rate of over one million hectares annually.[44] The later challenge also intertwines with the purposes of "The 2021–2030 UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration".[44]

 
Welcome sign of the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, Scotland.

Conference of the Parties (COP)

edit
Main article: United Nations Climate Change conference

During the COP21 negotiations in Paris, a map highlighting global peatland hotspots was released to showcase the areas that require immediate attention to decrease greenhouse emissions.[45]

At COP26, the Global Peatland Pavilion played a vital role in elevating discussions on the topic within the climate dialogue, served as both a physical and virtual gathering place for individuals involved in peatland management, research, policy-making, and other related areas across the globe.[46][47] It provided a platform for sharing knowledge, experiences, and insights on the global protection, restoration, and sustainable management of peatlands among practitioners, researchers, policymakers, enthusiasts, and other stakeholders.[46][47] On the final day of COP26 the talks for a future European Peatland Initiative where held.[46][48]

  • The Virtual Peatland Pavilion serves as a permanent source of information and knowledge.[49] It was developed by Richard Lindsay from the University of East London and offers an extensive collection of digitized content for users to access.[49] Additional content and domes will be incorporated into the resource as it evolves over time.[49]

European Peatland Initiative

edit

The European Peatlands Initiative (EPI) takes advantage of the expertise, knowledge, and experience of existing networks such as the UNEP-led Global Peatlands Initiative, among others, to facilitate progress in peatland conservation and restoration efforts.[50] Through the establishment of strategic partnerships among countries the EPI serves as a unifying force in promoting knowledge-sharing, mutual learning, and increased investment, to protect valuable peatlands across Europe.[50]

International Mire Conservation Group

edit

The International Mire Conservation Group (IMCG) was founded in 1984 in Klagenfurt, Austria, as an international network of experts from a diverse range of specialities and interests, including research scientists, consultants, government agency specialists, and peatland site managers.[51] By promoting, encouraging, and coordinating the conservation of mires and associated ecosystems the group aims to enhance knowledge-sharing and experience regarding mires and the factors influencing them.[51] Over 550 members across almost 60 countries conform the network of IMGC.[51]

International Peatland Society

edit

The International Peatland Society (IPS) is a group of members (including individuals, corporations, students, and institutions) who share a common goal of responsible management and use of peatlands and peat.[52] Established in Quebec, Canada in 1968, but now registered as an NGO in Finland. The IPS provides a platform for experts from various fields, involved in peat and peatlands, to connect with each other.[52] The society currently has 1,575 members from 37 countries as of 1 January 2023.[52]

Others

edit

National efforts and initiatives

edit

Canada

edit

This is an excerpt from the main page:

"Ducks Unlimited Canada (DUC) is a Canadian non-profit organization that works to conserve, restore and manage Canadian wetlands in order to preserve habitat for North American waterfowl, wildlife and people. They work with industry leaders, government agencies, landowners and other non-profit organizations to collaboratively protect critical habitats."

Indonesia

edit

The Peat Restoration Agency (BRG) is a specialized, integrated and comprehensive institution established on 6 January 2016. Its main objective is to expedite the recuperation and reinstatement of the hydrological functions of degraded peat, predominantly resulting from drying and fire, through a well-planned, systematized and targeted approach.[53]

United Kingdom

edit

This is an excerpt from the main page:

 
Logo of the charitable organisation the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust.

"The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (WWT) is an international wildfowl and wetland conservation charity in the United Kingdom. Its patron is Charles III, and its president is Kate Humble."

  • IUCN UK Peatland Programme

Established in 2009, the IUCN UK Peatland Programme encourages peatland restoration efforts in the United Kingdom. Through collaborations, scientific research, policy making, and effective practices, the Programme support the numerous benefits of peatlands.[54] The Programme has five main objectives:

  1. Notify the development of policies and legislation to guarantee the efficient conservation, restoration, and sustainable management of peatlands.[54]
  2. Raise awareness of the importance of peatlands ecosystems and garner support for their protection.[54]
  3. Increase information about peatland function and its connection with greenhouse gas emissions and water control.[54]
  4. Share knowledge with everyone involved in peatland administration.[54]
  5. Encourage good practices within peatland's core community while searching for restoration initiatives and economic opportunities.[54]

United States of America

edit

Ducks Unlimited is the world's largest and most effective private organization dedicated to conserving, restoring, and managing wetlands and associated habitats for North America's freshwater aquatic birds.[55] They recognize the challenges waterbirds conservation face due to the degradation and destruction of wetlands and other habitats, and aim to turn this pattern by collaborating with various stakeholders, including private individuals, landowners, agencies, and scientific communities.[55]

Sweden

edit

Life to ad(d)mire project was initiated to address the decline of specific wetland habitats and species at Natura 2000 sites in Sweden.[56] The project aimed to accomplish that with hydrological restoration and vegetation rehabilitation.[56] The ultimate goal was for the hydrologically-restored bogs to become carbon sinks, to prevent the ongoing loss of CO2 into the atmosphere caused by drained peatlands.[56] The project was able to successfully and economically restore peatlands, leading to increased interest from both national and international stakeholders.[56] In total 2930 hectares of wetlands across 28 sites in Sweden were restored through methods such as excavation, dam-building, and ditch-filling.[56]

Barriers to restoration

edit

Policy and legislation role and examples

edit

Policy creation and law building is a key to peatland restoration. One example is the Nature Restoration Law (NRL) targets specific restoration of Europe's degraded peatland ecosystems, habitats and species. With emphasis on wetland, rivers, forests, grasslands and marine ecosystems. A draft law within primarily targeted for restoring the drainage of peatlands from agricultural use.[57] These targets advocate strongly for agricultural peatlands, however, most EU countries land use of peatlands is for peat extraction or forestry. EU countries hold an estimate of 350,000km2 of peatland of which more than 50% is degraded mainly by drainage from agricultural use, forestry and peat extraction.[57] This demonstrate that although policy development is useful, it might be finely tuned to assist peatland restoration.

 
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Another example is the UN's SDG (Sustainable Development Goals), focusing on positive action and recovery across a variety of global issues. Goal 15 on protection and restoration of the environment is specifically important for restoration, but does not mention peatlands.[58] Goal 13, to "take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts" is used ti advocate for peatland restoration.[58] These acknowledgements are key to encouraging and supporting restoration policy development.

Policies such as these, could raise awareness to the importance of peatland restoration. To be furthered, emphasis on peatlands, its differing types and protection from usage (e.g. agricultural, extraction or pristine protections) has been proposed.[57]

Meaningful timings and scales of effects

edit

The more damaged an area of peatland is, the longer it will take to restore its ecosystems and natural biodiversity.[59] This can occur as a lag to restoration resulting in a need for prolonged measurement and supervision of the landscape to produce recovery in an area.[18] Consistency in action and regularly updates to goals are essential for accurate monitoring and restoration of peatlands.[18]

Due to this, local initiatives need consistent funding and interest. However, global strategies may have far-reaching positive implications if policy and protection is extended further into peatland recovery from groups and larger governing bodies (such as UN legislation or national governments).[46]

 
Wind turbines at Scout Moor, an upland moor of peat bog and heather in the South Pennines.

Change of land use

edit

The development of renewable energy, transport and highways, extractive industries, housing, and other built infrastructure pose a threat to peatlands, which may have a negative effect on peatland conservation, on their biodiversity, and ecosystem function.[11] Therefore, it is essential to have effective planning, development policies, and guidance to ensure sustainable development that does not harm the peatlands and their ecosystem function.[11]

The effects of development on biodiversity can include:

  • Loss or deterioration of habitats due to the introduction of materials and structures.[11]
  • Disturbances to species, causing direct harm or death.[11]
  • Impacts on the peatland's hydrological system.[11]

Projects that cannot avoid peatland areas should aim to minimize their impact through mitigation measures, restoration of the development footprint, and broader peatland areas, as well as direct reinstatement efforts.[11]

Agriculture and horticulture

edit
 
Commercial Canadian Sphagnum peat moss, a common soil supplement.

Revegetation and rewetting of drained peatlands may involve the loss of agricultural production areas or a decrease in their productivity.[60] This may have a negative impact on the income of small farmers.[60] The selection of restoration sites must conform to local governance systems, land rights and administrations.[60] In parallel, it is essential to ensure that alternative livelihood options are available to the communities living in the restored areas.[60]

Sphagnum peat moss is a frequently used growth medium for the cultivation of houseplants and forest plants, is obtained by harvesting peat bogs in the circumboreal area and then distributed across the globe.[61] Peat moss is a crucial substrate for forest plant nursery production, as it significantly enhances the quality and survival of seedlings.[61] The selection of this substrate is based on several factors, including its organic and mineral composition, ability to retain water, cost, and availability.[61]

Society and culture

edit
 
Preserved head of the Tollund Man.

Peatlands have historically been considered unproductive and have been drained for economic purposes for many centuries.[24] In the Peruvian Amazonia, they are used for activities such as hunting, gathering palm fruits, and logging.[62] But they are also associated with fear due to the risks of becoming lost, sinking into the marshy terrain, and encountering dangerous fauna, including anacondas and mythical creatures.[62] A study conducted in Scotland demonstrated that the general public acknowledges the importance of the environmental advantages associated with peatlands; however, they also perceive a trade-off between preserving the peatlands and using their potential for productivity.[30]

Despite the fact that many people today are unfamiliar with peatlands, some recognize them through references such as the discovery of the Tollund Man in a Danish peatland or the depiction of wetland ecosystems in The Lord of the Rings series, such as the scene where the hobbit Frodo navigates through the "Dead marshes".[24]

See also

edit
 
Scholia has a profile for peatland restoration (Q115254837).

References

edit
  1. ^ "International Peatland Society". International Peatland Society. 31 May 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  2. ^ a b Evers, Stephanie; Yule, Catherine M.; Padfeild, Rory; O'Reilly, Patrick; Varkkey, Helena (2017). "Keep wetlands wet: the myth of sustainable development of tropical peatlands – implications for policies and management" (PDF). Global Change Biology. 23 (2): 534–549. Bibcode:2017GCBio..23..534E. doi:10.1111/gcb.13422. PMID 27399889. S2CID 10717366.
  3. ^ a b Convention on Wetlands. (2021). Restoring drained peatlands: A necessary step to achieve global climate goals. Ramsar Policy Brief No. 5. Gland, Switzerland: Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands.
  4. ^ a b "Peatlands and climate change". IUCN. December 2021. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  5. ^ "Understanding carbon cycling in warming northern peatlands". GlobalChange.gov. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  6. ^ "Peatlands and climate change". IUCN. December 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Convention on Wetlands. (2021). Global guidelines for peatland rewetting and restoration. Ramsar Technical Report No. 11. Gland, Switzerland: Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands.
  8. ^ a b c Price, Jonathan; Evans, Chris; Evans, Martin; Allott, Tim; Shuttleworth, Emma (29 February 2016), Bonn, Aletta; Allott, Tim; Evans, Martin; Joosten, Hans (eds.), "Peatland restoration and hydrology", Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–94, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177788.006, ISBN 978-1-107-02518-9, retrieved 5 May 2023
  9. ^ Pearsall, William Harold (1950). Mountains and moorlands.
  10. ^ "Restoration of Peatland Ecosystem: Peatland Hydrological Restoration | Department of Economic and Social Affairs". sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g Detrey, Iain (March 2023). "Peatlands and Development" (PDF). IUCN UK Peatland Programme. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  12. ^ a b Loisel, Julie; Gallego-Sala, Angela (13 September 2022). "Ecological resilience of restored peatlands to climate change". Communications Earth & Environment. 3 (1): 208. Bibcode:2022ComEE...3..208L. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00547-x. hdl:10871/131588. ISSN 2662-4435. S2CID 252203960.
  13. ^ a b Limpens, J; Berendse, F; Blodau, C; Canadell, J.G.; Holden, J; Roulet, N; Rydin, H; Schaepman-Strub, G (2008). "Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications – a synthesis" (PDF). Biogeosciences. 5 (5): 1475–1491. Bibcode:2008BGeo....5.1475L. doi:10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008. S2CID 129950828.
  14. ^ a b c Harrison, Mark E.; Page, Susan E.; Limin, Suwido H. (2009). "The global impact of Indonesian forest fires". Biologist. 56 (3): 156–163.
  15. ^ Wilkinson, S. L.; Andersen, R.; Moore, P. A.; Davidson, S. J.; Granath, G.; Waddington, J. M. (May 2023). "Wildfire and degradation accelerate northern peatland carbon release". Nature Climate Change. 13 (5): 456–461. Bibcode:2023NatCC..13..456W. doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01657-w. ISSN 1758-6798. S2CID 258270898.
  16. ^ Worrall, Fred; Boothroyd, Ian M.; Gardner, Rosie L.; Howden, Nicholas J. K.; Burt, Tim P.; Smith, Richard; Mitchell, Lucy; Kohler, Tim; Gregg, Ruth (June 2019). "The Impact of Peatland Restoration on Local Climate: Restoration of a Cool Humid Island". Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 124 (6): 1696–1713. Bibcode:2019JGRG..124.1696W. doi:10.1029/2019JG005156. hdl:1983/bf8ba875-3202-404b-9c62-89318c4df6aa. ISSN 2169-8953. S2CID 189974027.
  17. ^ Bonn, Aletta; Allott, Tim; Evans, Martin; Joosten, Hans; Stoneman, Rob (2016), Bonn, Aletta; Joosten, Hans; Evans, Martin; Stoneman, Rob (eds.), "Peatland restoration and ecosystem services: an introduction", Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services: Science, Policy and Practice, Ecological Reviews, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177788.002, ISBN 978-1-107-61970-8, retrieved 7 May 2023
  18. ^ a b c d e Haapalehto, Tuomas O.; Vasander, Harri; Jauhiainen, Sinikka; Tahvanainen, Teemu; S. Kotiaho, Janne (2010). "The Effects of Peatland Restoration on Water-Table Depth, Elemental Concentrations, and Vegetation: 10 Years of Changes". Restoration Ecology. 19 (5): 587–598. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00704.x. S2CID 46321541 – via Wiley.
  19. ^ a b Goudarzi, Salim; Milledge, David G.; Holden, Joseph; Evans, Martin G.; Allott, Timothy E. H.; Shuttleworth, Emma L.; Pilkington, Michael; Walker, Jonathan (April 2021). "Blanket Peat Restoration: Numerical Study of the Underlying Processes Delivering Natural Flood Management Benefits". Water Resources Research. 57 (4). Bibcode:2021WRR....5729209G. doi:10.1029/2020WR029209. hdl:2164/21308. ISSN 0043-1397. S2CID 235590750.
  20. ^ a b c d "Environmental and Socio-economic Benefits of Peatland Restoration : water@leeds". water.leeds.ac.uk. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  21. ^ Joosten, Hans; Sirin, Andrey; Couwenberg, John; Laine, Jukka; Smith, Pete (2016), Bonn, Aletta; Joosten, Hans; Evans, Martin; Stoneman, Rob (eds.), "The role of peatlands in climate regulation", Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services: Science, Policy and Practice, Ecological Reviews, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–76, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177788.005, ISBN 978-1-107-61970-8, retrieved 8 May 2023
  22. ^ Smith, Pete; Ashmore, Mike R.; Black, Helaina I. J.; Burgess, Paul J.; Evans, Chris D.; Quine, Timothy A.; Thomson, Amanda M.; Hicks, Kevin; Orr, Harriet G. (August 2013). Angeler, David (ed.). "REVIEW: The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality". Journal of Applied Ecology. 50 (4): 812–829. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12016.
  23. ^ Ketcheson, Scott J.; Price, Jonathan S. (2011). "The Impact of Peatland Restoration on the Site Hydrology of an Abandoned Block-Cut Bog". Wetlands. 31 (6): 1263–1274. doi:10.1007/s13157-011-0241-0. ISSN 0277-5212. S2CID 23391660 – via Springer.
  24. ^ a b c d Zak, Dominik; Maagaard, Astrid Ledet; Liu, Haojie (1 January 2022), "Restoring Riparian Peatlands for Inland Waters: A European Perspective", in Mehner, Thomas; Tockner, Klement (eds.), Encyclopedia of Inland Waters (Second Edition), Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 276–287, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819166-8.00127-4, ISBN 978-0-12-822041-2, S2CID 245056003, retrieved 3 May 2023
  25. ^ Antonijević, Danica; Hoffmann, Mathias; Prochnow, Annette; Krabbe, Karoline; Weituschat, Mirjam; Couwenberg, John; Ehlert, Sigrid; Zak, Dominik; Augustin, Jürgen (21 April 2023). "The unexpected long period of elevated CH 4 emissions from an inundated fen meadow ended only with the occurrence of cattail ( Typha latifolia )". Global Change Biology. 29 (13): 3678–3691. doi:10.1111/gcb.16713. ISSN 1354-1013. PMID 37029755. S2CID 258028382.
  26. ^ a b c Elo, Merja; Penttinen, Jouni; Kotiaho, Janne S. (9 April 2015). "The effect of peatland drainage and restoration on Odonata species richness and abundance". BMC Ecology. 15 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s12898-015-0042-z. ISSN 1472-6785. PMC 4412142. PMID 25888218.
  27. ^ a b Alsila, Terhi; Elo, Merja; Hakkari, Tomi; Kotiaho, Janne S. (January 2021). "Effects of habitat restoration on peatland bird communities". Restoration Ecology. 29 (1). doi:10.1111/rec.13304. ISSN 1061-2971. S2CID 228981593.
  28. ^ a b c "Peatland restoration brings back rare birds after twenty years". The RSPB. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  29. ^ a b c d Emsens, Willem-Jan; van Diggelen, Rudy; Aggenbach, Camiel J. S.; Cajthaml, Tomáš; Frouz, Jan; Klimkowska, Agata; Kotowski, Wiktor; Kozub, Lukasz; Liczner, Yvonne; Seeber, Elke; Silvennoinen, Hanna; Tanneberger, Franziska; Vicena, Jakub; Wilk, Mateusz; Verbruggen, Erik (July 2020). "Recovery of fen peatland microbiomes and predicted functional profiles after rewetting". The ISME Journal. 14 (7): 1701–1712. doi:10.1038/s41396-020-0639-x. ISSN 1751-7370. PMC 7305128. PMID 32242082.
  30. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Artz, Rebekka; Chapman, Steve, eds. (2016). Peatlands (PDF). Craigiebucker, Aberdeen: The James Hutton Institute.
  31. ^ "Preventing Peatland fires in Indonesia". UNREDD Programme. 19 November 2021. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  32. ^ Hein, Lars; Spadaro, Joseph V.; Ostro, Bart; Hammer, Melanie; Sumarga, Elham; Salmayenti, Resti; Boer, Rizaldi; Tata, Hesti; Atmoko, Dwi; Castañeda, Juan-Pablo (6 July 2022). "The health impacts of Indonesian peatland fires". Environmental Health. 21 (1): 62. doi:10.1186/s12940-022-00872-w. ISSN 1476-069X. PMC 9256533. PMID 35790967.
  33. ^ "How countries can tackle devastating peatland wildfires". UNEP. 12 August 2022. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  34. ^ Artz, Rebekka R.E.; Faccioli, Michela; Roberts, Michaela; Anderson, Russell (2018). "Peatland restoration – a comparative analysis of the costs and merits of different restoration methods" (PDF). ClimateXChange. Retrieved 29 April 2023 – via The James Hutton Institute.
  35. ^ a b c "Restoration of Peatland Ecosystem: Peatland Hydrological Restoration | Department of Economic and Social Affairs". sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  36. ^ a b c d "Peat Dams" (PDF). Moors for the Future Partnership. MoorLIFE 2020. 2020. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  37. ^ a b c d "Plastic Dams" (PDF). Moors for the Future Partnership. MoorLIFE 2020. 2020. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  38. ^ "Field Notes: Peatland restoration". www.johnmuirtrust.org. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  39. ^ a b "Yorkshire Dales: Wool logs placed on moorland to protect peat". BBC News. 27 March 2023. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  40. ^ "First wool logs laid on Dales peatland in boost for fleece trade". Darlington and Stockton Times. 29 March 2023. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  41. ^ a b "Trialling Dartmoor wool in peatland restoration". South West Peatland Partnership. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
  42. ^ "Paludikultur Hintergrund – Moorwissen en". mowi.botanik.uni-greifswald.de. Retrieved 2 May 2023.
  43. ^ Tanneberger, Franziska; Schröder, Christian; Hohlbein, Monika; Lenschow, † Uwe; Permien, Thorsten; Wichmann, Sabine; Wichtmann, Wendelin (1 December 2020). "Climate Change Mitigation through Land Use on Rewetted Peatlands – Cross-Sectoral Spatial Planning for Paludiculture in Northeast Germany". Wetlands. 40 (6): 2309–2320. doi:10.1007/s13157-020-01310-8. ISSN 1943-6246. S2CID 256043199.
  44. ^ a b Kreyling, J.; Tanneberger, F.; Jansen, F.; van der Linden, S.; Aggenbach, C.; Blüml, V.; Couwenberg, J.; Emsens, W.-J.; Joosten, H.; Klimkowska, A.; Kotowski, W.; Kozub, L.; Lennartz, B.; Liczner, Y.; Liu, H. (5 October 2021). "Rewetting does not return drained fen peatlands to their old selves". Nature Communications. 12 (1): 5693. Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.5693K. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25619-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 8492760. PMID 34611156.
  45. ^ Purnomo, Herry (2017). "FOR PEAT'S SAKE: THE FACTS" (PDF). United Nations Climate Change. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  46. ^ a b c d Ball, Caitlin (30 November 2021). "No Paris without Peatlands: building collaboration at COP26". Bax & Company. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  47. ^ a b "Peru at the Peatland Pavilion". Global Peatlands Initiative. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  48. ^ "European Peatlands Initiative". europeanpeatlandsinitiative.com. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  49. ^ a b c "Peatland Pavilion at COP26 | IUCN UK Peatland Programme". IUCN Peatland Programme. Retrieved 2 May 2023.
  50. ^ a b "About European Peatlands Initiative". europeanpeatlandsinitiative.com. 23 March 2023. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  51. ^ a b c "International Mire Conservation Group – Home". www.imcg.net. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  52. ^ a b c "Organisation". International Peatland Society. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  53. ^ "Peatland Restoration Agency (Badan Restorasi Gambut – Indonesia) | Devex". www.devex.com. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  54. ^ a b c d e f "About Us | IUCN UK Peatland Programme". IUCN Peatland Programme. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  55. ^ a b "About DU | Ducks Unlimited". www.ducks.org. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  56. ^ a b c d e "LIFE 3.0 – LIFE Project Public Page". webgate.ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  57. ^ a b c "Higher ambition for Peatlands in the EU Nature Restoration Law Proposal – Briefing". Wetlands International Europe. Retrieved 8 May 2023.
  58. ^ a b Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Republic of Indonesia (Government) (n.d.). "Restoration of Peatland Ecosystem: Peatland Hydrological Restoration". sdgs.un.org.
  59. ^ Cris, R; Buckmaster, S; Bain, C; Reed, M (2014). "Global Peatland Restoration demonstrating SUCCESS". IUCN UK National Committee Peatland Programme.
  60. ^ a b c d York, University of. "Enhancing the Benefits of Tropical Peatland Restoration for Supporting Local Communities and Ecosystem Processes". University of York. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  61. ^ a b c Ángeles-Argáiz, Rodolfo Enrique; Flores-García, Andrés; Ulloa, Miguel; Garibay-Orijel, Roberto (1 January 2016). "Commercial Sphagnum peat moss is a vector for exotic ectomycorrhizal mushrooms". Biological Invasions. 18 (1): 89–101. doi:10.1007/s10530-015-0992-2. ISSN 1573-1464. S2CID 254292158.
  62. ^ a b Schulz, Christopher; Martín Brañas, Manuel; Núñez Pérez, Cecilia; Del Aguila Villacorta, Margarita; Laurie, Nina; Lawson, Ian T.; Roucoux, Katherine H. (1 July 2019). "Uses, cultural significance, and management of peatlands in the Peruvian Amazon: Implications for conservation". Biological Conservation. 235: 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.005. hdl:10023/19965. ISSN 0006-3207. S2CID 181554720.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peatland_restoration&oldid=1252056038"