Talk:Melbourne bus route 901
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Melbourne bus route 901 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 October 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability Assement (if you want to update copy this one and make a change do not delete this one though, if you disagree please state you do so and give reasons)
editSource | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://web.archive.org/web/20110226192406/http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/web23/Home.nsf/AllDocs/FF5ECD6545A6083BCA25766600141DE9?OpenDocument | Made by government who runs the route | Government website | ~ Only a some part of this page makes coverage of the bus route | ✘ No |
https://citymapper.com/melbourne/bus/buses-901 | City planner is a secondary source and is not alfilliated with PTV or Kinetic | This source is shown to be reliable and consists of real time information | Only gives information about the mentioned bus route | ✔ Yes |
https://www.danielbowen.com/2018/03/02/every-bus-a-smartbus/ | The source is an independant blog | ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims | ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail | ? Unknown |
https://www.danielbowen.com/transport/melb-changes/ | The source is an independant blog | ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims | ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail | ? Unknown |
https://www.wearekinetic.com/media/kinetic-wins-victorian-government-contract-to-run-a-third-of-melbournes-bus-network | Press release from company who runs the bus route | Press release from the operating company | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/new-bus-franchise-jump-start-zero-emissions-pledge | Press release from government who runs the bus route | Government press release | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/thirty-six-new-electric-buses-by-2025-as-melbourne-company-awarded-2-3b-contract-20211002-p58wmu.html | Major Australian news article | Major Australian news article | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/7531/frankston-melbourne-airport/ | Run by government who operates the bus | Government Website | Mentions the said bus route and only the bus route | ✘ No |
https://moovitapp.com/melbourne-2803/lines/901/314882/4288141/en-gb?ref=2&customerId=4908 | Independant from the government and rollingstock operator | Website has proven to be reliable and consists of real time information | Mentions the bus route and only the bus route | ✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
Assement of Anylysis-
Only 2 sources fullfill the notability guide, out of 9, 1 more source is reliable however does not have significant coverage needs 1 or 2 more sources that fullfill the notability guide to be considerd notable NotOrrio (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Notability Assement 2 (if you want to update copy this one and make a change do not delete this one though, if you disagree please state you do so and give reasons)
editSource | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://web.archive.org/web/20110226192406/http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/web23/Home.nsf/AllDocs/FF5ECD6545A6083BCA25766600141DE9?OpenDocument | Made by government who runs the route | Government website | ~ Only a some part of this page makes coverage of the bus route | ✘ No |
https://citymapper.com/melbourne/bus/buses-901 | City planner is a secondary source and is not alfilliated with PTV or Kinetic | This source is shown to be reliable and consists of real time information | Only gives information about the mentioned bus route | ✔ Yes |
https://www.danielbowen.com/2018/03/02/every-bus-a-smartbus/ | The source is an independant blog | ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims | ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail | ? Unknown |
https://www.danielbowen.com/transport/melb-changes/ | The source is an independant blog | ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims | ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail | ? Unknown |
https://www.wearekinetic.com/media/kinetic-wins-victorian-government-contract-to-run-a-third-of-melbournes-bus-network | Press release from company who runs the bus route | Press release from the operating company | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/new-bus-franchise-jump-start-zero-emissions-pledge | Press release from government who runs the bus route | Government press release | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/thirty-six-new-electric-buses-by-2025-as-melbourne-company-awarded-2-3b-contract-20211002-p58wmu.html | Major Australian news article | Major Australian news article | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/7531/frankston-melbourne-airport/ | Run by government who operates the bus | Government Website | Mentions the said bus route and only the bus route | ✘ No |
https://moovitapp.com/melbourne-2803/lines/901/314882/4288141/en-gb?ref=2&customerId=4908 | Independant from the government and rollingstock operator | Website has proven to be reliable and consists of real time information | Mentions the bus route and only the bus route | ✔ Yes |
https://www.traveller.com.au/the-odyssey-2w8py | Major Australian Travel article | Major Australian Travel article | Main topic is PTV route 901, the bus route mentioned in the following wikipedia article | ✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
Assement of Anylysis- 3 Sources fullfill the notability guide 1 timetable, 1 map and 1 article, based on the fact that 3 different types of sources fullfill the guide its safe to say the article is notable
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://web.archive.org/web/20110226192406/http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/web23/Home.nsf/AllDocs/FF5ECD6545A6083BCA25766600141DE9?OpenDocument | Made by government who runs the route | Government website | Only a some part of this page makes coverage of the bus route | ✘ No |
https://citymapper.com/melbourne/bus/buses-901 | City planner is a secondary source and is not alfilliated with PTV or Kinetic | This source is shown to be reliable and consists of real time information | Only gives information about the mentioned bus route | ✘ No |
https://www.danielbowen.com/2018/03/02/every-bus-a-smartbus/ | The source is an independant blog | The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't necessarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims | The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail | ✘ No |
https://www.danielbowen.com/transport/melb-changes/ | The source is an independant blog | The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't necessarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims | The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail | ✘ No |
https://www.wearekinetic.com/media/kinetic-wins-victorian-government-contract-to-run-a-third-of-melbournes-bus-network | Press release from company who runs the bus route | Press release from the operating company | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/new-bus-franchise-jump-start-zero-emissions-pledge | Press release from government who runs the bus route | Government press release | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/thirty-six-new-electric-buses-by-2025-as-melbourne-company-awarded-2-3b-contract-20211002-p58wmu.html | Major Australian news article | Major Australian news article | No mentioning of the bus route what so ever | ✘ No |
https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/7531/frankston-melbourne-airport/ | Run by government who operates the bus | Government Website | Mentions the said bus route and only the bus route | ✘ No |
https://moovitapp.com/melbourne-2803/lines/901/314882/4288141/en-gb?ref=2&customerId=4908 | Independant from the government and rollingstock operator | Website has proven to be reliable and consists of real time information | Mentions the bus route and only the bus route | ✘ No |
https://www.traveller.com.au/the-odyssey-2w8py | Major Australian Travel article | Major Australian Travel article | Main topic is PTV route 901, the bus route mentioned in the following Wikipedia article | ✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
Assement of Anylysis- Only one source potentially satisfies the requirements of being significant coverage in an independent secondary source. Timetables and maps are evidence that the bus route exists but are not considered significant coverage for the purposes of establishing notability. Based on the above the draft clearly does not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Dan arndt (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)