Talk:Gregg Hotel

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 November 2020 by reviewer Kvng (talk · contribs).

Untitled

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

What am I doing wrong? All I'm trying to do is record a historical structure that has been lost to time by documenting the truth citing resources. I have complied with previous denials and removed requested content (even though I strongly disagreed). What is wrong now? The reviewer is not being specific enough and based on what I'm understanding, I disagree.

Please explain.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.219.19.95 (talk) 02:49, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

As an uninvolved editor who found this in Category:promising draft articles, I disagree with the reviewers. The draft presents both positive and negative details about the former hotel, and the only promotional content I can find is "The celebration had great fanfare and nearly every guest room booked" and "Anyone could subscribe to an annual membership which entitled use of the year-around swimming pool"; neither of these are very severe. However, one definite problem is the lack of a lead section. If a good, properly summarising lead is added, the draft is ready for mainspace IMO. Glades12 (talk) 10:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

There is also a lack of context; that is, the draft does very little to introduce this subject to someone who knows nothing about it. I have tagged the page with {{context}} and {{no lead}} to help address these two issues. The first reviewer also notes that there is too much of a focus on minor events compared to ones of more weight, but that is not big enough of a problem to keep this in draftspace. Glades12 (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic