Talk:IAG Research

(Redirected from Draft talk:IAG Research)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Alan D. Gould in topic Requesting Assistance to Finalize Draft

Requesting Assistance to Finalize Draft

edit

Hello Wiki editor community, I have a declared COI on this draft. I have recently made efforts to make the content more encyclopedic, and to provide additional sources to underscore the subject's notability. Acknowledging the concerns that are inherent with this kind of COI, I would appreciate if neutral editors who have worked on similar article topics would take a look at the current version, and make any additional changes or suggestions that would help ensure this article is ready for full approval. Alan D. Gould (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello David Gerard, Onel5969, Mrmctorso, Kannan.529, Melodies1917:
Apologies to you all for tagging you out of the blue. I'm wondering if any of you editors can offer advice on this article. Given that this is a draft page and I personally have COI issues, I have decided to reach out to editors who I see have made recent contributions to pages similar or relevant to this article's subject. I have made efforts to improve the quality of this page's content, but I'd very much appreciate further vetting, edits, and suggestions from neutral third parties before formally resubmitting the article.
Please take a look if you are so inclined, any feedback here is much appreciated!
Best,
Alan D. Gould (talk) 21:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
When creating the article, simply be factual, and try not to sound like a promotional brochure. Stuff like clients and non-notable awards are purely promotional. Investors are not. And be balanced. If there is any negative coverage, include that. Hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 22:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for these recommendations, Onel5969. I will make some changes as you have suggested before resubmitting.
Alan D. Gould (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Significant updates have now been made to the article to make it less promotional, more encyclopedic, and more comprehensively sourced. Thank you again for your advice, Onel5969, I'll be resubmitting shortly.
Best,
Alan D. Gould (talk) 21:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply