Draft talk:John Yates (Culadasa)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Citations for massage book
editGoogle Scholar gives about 40 citations of the book, several with substantial excerpts; see https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=5%2C39&sciodt=0%2C39&cites=11601549670757859240&scipsc=1&q=yates&btnG= and https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=5%2C39&sciodt=0%2C39&cites=7415964268673203630&scipsc=1&q=yates&btnG=
One of these hits is highly cited, namely Janet Finch (2007) Displaying Families and Julie Walsh (2015) Displaying Families: exploring the significance of ‘display’ in a city that is increasingly culturally diverse, but the citation may be spurious since I could not find the reference. — Charles Stewart (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Addressing the concerns of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Yates (Culadasa)
editLack of substantial citations
editThe article's reference to stories in US newspapers about the B&B was not held to be substantial enough. The article now has 3 significant citations relating to the massage book, one of which is very substantial. — Charles Stewart (talk) 10:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Potential confusion with high-impact researchers
editGiven the fact that John Yates is a common name, I understand why this risk was raised in the AfD. However, I think it is clear that the author of the massage book and the author of the meditation guide are the same person. — Charles Stewart (talk) 10:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Furthermore the article does not attempt to claim John Yates had a distinguished research career. I've made it clear in the article that most of his academic career was teaching. — Charles Stewart (talk) 11:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC) (edited)
Sales of The Mind Illuminated
editThis page asserts that the first, self-published edition of the book sold 18,000 copies in a year. If this claim could be backed up by a reliable source, it would provide support for notability. In general, the book has received a lot of coverage on internet fora related to meditation, but nothing that I found counts as reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. — Charles Stewart (talk) 07:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Tucker Peck's citation of TMI
editTucker Peck's PhD dissertation - http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/577185/1/azu_etd_13753_sip1_m.pdf - cites a preprint of The Mind Illuminated. — Charles Stewart (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)