Draft talk:Lee keon jae
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Ldm1954 in topic What should I write for Lee keon jae to be registered?
What should I write for Lee keon jae to be registered?
editIs it possible to provide feedback on any parts that are needed or lacking? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 01:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- You need to:
- Declare your COI, please read WP:COI
- Use the correct reference formatting
- Find secondary refs that are completely independent
- Ask on the TeaHouse for some help to remove your other draft.
- Ldm1954 (talk) 04:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- thank you very much!
- I've just finished editing, but are there any more missing parts? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest looking at the following for ideas, noting my comments
- Keum-Shik Hong a bit long and wordy, could be shorter
- Paik Un-gyu references should be translated
- Yang Ji-won should use infobox scientist
- John M. Cowley an excellent page, short sharp and too the point without fluff
- John C. H. Spence also good, a little long-winded
- Ldm1954 (talk) 06:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- thank you so much :)!
- I modified it based on your reference. Is there anything else that needs to be modified? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 08:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see all the changes done, and a lot more is needed:
- No COI statement on you user page or here
External links are formatted wrong- PhD link just goes to an alumni page, not his PhD
- The high school link only proves the existence of the school, not that he attended it.
- The Research experience section has only one source, and also WP:PEACOCK terms such as "innovation"
- You have to construct this with as much care an attention to details as you would use for a submission to Nature. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also, you need independent sources, one less linked to you. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- thank you so much!!!
- COI was mentioned, and external links were also modified. Is there anything else missing? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 01:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- As a referee, when an author ignores the requested changes without justification I view it as an insult and normally recommend rejection. I do not think you are reading what I said, and I am not going to repeat myself. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see all the changes done, and a lot more is needed:
- I suggest looking at the following for ideas, noting my comments