Talk:No net loss environmental policy

No net loss

I wanted to create a page for no net loss as a policy beyond the United States while retaining the US-specific article. I hope to rename the No net loss wetlands policy page to 'No net loss policy in the United States' and create this as an overall article to address the issue that the page does not represent a worldwide view of the subject since this has been flagged as an issue for three years now. Manxshearwater (talk) 15:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Comments left by AfC reviewers

• Comment: @Robert McClenon: I have closed the RM with a moved outcome. Since you have this draft under review, do you want to complete the process? – robertsky (talk) 04:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: There is currently a redirect from [No net loss]] to No net loss wetlands policy. There is also a Requested Move to rename No net loss wetlands policy to No net loss wetlands policy in the United States. Consideration should be given to accepting this draft as No net loss environmental policy, because it applies to other types of environmental resources besides wetlands, and moving the existing article, which is nation-oriented. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that more than 69 countries have no net loss environmental policies?

• Source: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41893-018-0176-z

• Reviewed:

Created by Manxshearwater (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Manxshearwater (talk) 14:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC).