Draft talk:Shore Capital Partners

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Curb Safe Charmer in topic Notability

Notability

edit

@Trailblazer101 and Timtrent: I did think of moving this back to draft myself, but have previously been challenged that WP:DRAFTOBJECT meant that if something started life as a draft, and was moved to mainspace it should not be draftified. That's not my interpretation, but hey.

That move seemed more than a little 'ducky' to me.

Do either of you have access to the WSJ articles? Almost all the sources are paywalled, so I couldn't say definitively how much independent, secondary coverage there was and whether or not it was enough to meet WP:NCORP. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Curb Safe Charmer Regrettably I have no access 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Curb Safe Charmer Shore Capital Partners existed. now is a redirect. Odd history 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, I do not have access to the WSJ. Just from a quick glance at this draft, it still reads a lot like promotional material and trivial facts with not much independent coverage. As for the history, this draft was rejected at AfC multiple times and was unilaterally moved by an uninvolved new editor. I reverted that move as it bypassed the AfC process and did not address the concerns raised there, because it should not have been moved in the first place. I left a mainspace redirect behind to point it to a related subject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've left a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've been able to access three out of the four WSJ articles via ProQuest:
These are all entirely based on what a spokesman for the company said, with no analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply