Draft talk:World Trade Institute
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I have not had a reaction on my latest edits. Therefore I erase the "written like an advertisemnt" banner from the top of this entry on my own. Erich Schwarz/26.10.2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erich Schwarz (talk • contribs) 09:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
I took note of that this entry was evaluated as "written like an advertisement" as of May 2011. In the changes of Oct 18, 2011, I re-edited the article towards a more neutral point of view, adding as well references. Even though I am employee of the World Trade Institute, I would like to adhere to the basic principles of Wikipedia using a neutral point of view as possible and providing references for verifiability's sake. If any authors would like to address the contents, I am happy to hear of your improvement suggestions. Erich Schwarz/19.10.2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erich Schwarz (talk • contribs) 13:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Main Auditorium of World Trade Institute in Bern.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:Main Auditorium of World Trade Institute in Bern.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Main Auditorium of World Trade Institute in Bern.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC) |
Move to Draft - explanation
editThis article is not ready for the main space yet: Its only source is from a site which contains content generated by those affiliated with the subject. While I'm sure it is possible to find secondary sources for this article, it needs to be reevaluated and rewritten by an unaffiliated editor, taking into account our policies at WP:COI and WP:ORG. Employees of this company are strongly discouraged from creating their own articles or articles for their colleagues, no matter how well they are able to "source" themselves. Editors who are unsure about whether or not they are eligible or ineligible to write on the subject of this organization are encouraged to be transparent and make use of Articles for creation procedures when submitting articles on this subject for creation. Help can also be given at the talk page of the AfC project. Many thanks to all involved and thank you for your time spent editing on Wikipedia. Please feel free to contact me on my talk page at any time regarding general inquiries not related to this page or if you would like to alert me to something written here on this draft talk page. many thanks. Edaham (talk) 04:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)