Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station
The Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant on the shore of Lake Erie near Monroe, in Frenchtown Charter Township, Michigan on approximately 1,000 acres (400 ha). All units of the plant are operated by the DTE Energy Electric Company and owned (100 percent) by parent company DTE Energy. It is approximately halfway between Detroit, Michigan, and Toledo, Ohio. It is also visible from parts of Amherstburg and Colchester, Ontario as well as on the shore of Lake Erie in Ottawa County, Ohio. Two units have been constructed on this site. The first unit's construction started on August 4, 1956 and reached initial criticality on August 23, 1963, and the second unit received its construction permit on September 26, 1972. It reached criticality (head on) on June 21, 1985 and was declared commercial on November 18, 1988. The plant is connected to two single-circuit 345 kV Transmission Lines and three 120 kV lines. They are operated and maintained by ITC Transmission.
| Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station | |
|---|---|
 The Fermi Station (NRC image) | |
 | |
| Official name | Fermi Power Plant |
| Country | United States |
| Location | Frenchtown Charter Township, Monroe County, Michigan |
| Coordinates | 41°57′46″N 83°15′27″W / 41.96278°N 83.25750°W |
| Status | Operational |
| Construction began | Unit 1: August 8, 1956 Unit 2: September 26, 1972 |
| Commission date | Unit 1: August 7, 1966 Unit 2: January 23, 1988 |
| Decommission date | Unit 1: November 29, 1972 |
| Construction cost | $6.110 billion (2007 USD)[1] |
| Owner | DTE Energy |
| Operator | DTE Energy |
| Nuclear power station | |
| Reactor type | BWR/4 |
| Reactor supplier | General Electric |
| Cooling towers | 2 × Natural Draft |
| Cooling source | Lake Erie |
| Thermal capacity | 1 × 3486 MWth |
| Power generation | |
| Units operational | 1 × 1202 MW |
| Make and model | Unit 1: Liquid Metal FBR Unit 2: BWR/4 (Mark 1) |
| Units planned | 1 × 1520 MW ESBWR |
| Units decommissioned | 1 × 61 MW Liquid Metal FBR |
| Nameplate capacity | 1150 MW |
| Capacity factor | 99.01% (2019) 76.3% (lifetime, excluding Unit 1) |
| Annual net output | 9,369 GWh (2021) |
| External links | |
| Website | Fermi 2 Power Plant |
| Commons | Related media on Commons |
The plant is named after the Italian nuclear physicist Enrico Fermi, most noted for his work on the development of the first nuclear reactor as well as many other major contributions to nuclear physics. Fermi won the 1938 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on induced radioactivity.
On October 5, 1966, Fermi 1, a prototype fast breeder reactor, suffered a partial fuel meltdown, although no radioactive material was released. After repairs it was shut down by 1972.[2]
On August 8, 2008, John McCain was taken on a 45-minute tour of the plant, becoming the first actively campaigning presidential candidate to visit a nuclear plant.[3]
Fermi 1
editThe 69 MWe prototype fast breeder reactor Fermi 1 unit was under construction and development at the site from 1956 to 1963. Initial criticality was achieved on August 23, 1963. On October 5, 1966 Fermi 1 suffered a partial fuel meltdown. Two of the 92 fuel assemblies were partially damaged. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), there was no abnormal radioactivity released into the environment.[4]
Fermi 1 was a liquid metal (sodium) cooled fast breeder reactor design. It was capable of producing 200 megawatts thermal (MWt) power or 69 MW electrical power with 26% enriched metallic uranium fuel. The enriched uranium section of the reactor (core) was a 30 inches (76 cm) in diameter cylinder by 30 inches high and contained 92 fuel assemblies. The core was surrounded by 548 additional assemblies containing depleted uranium. These assemblies were about 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) square by about 8 feet (2.4 m) tall. Only the core section contained the enriched uranium while depleted uranium was placed above and below within the assemblies. The core also contained 2 control rods and 8 safety rods. The plant was designed for 430 MWt and 125 MWe using a newer uranium oxide fuel, but the plant was closed before the fuel was ever ordered.
A 168 MWe oil-fired boiler was added in 1966 to utilize the turbine-generator during periods when the reactor was not producing power.
The main cause of the partial meltdown was a temperature increase caused by a blockage in one of the lower support plate orifices that allowed the flow of liquid sodium into the reactor. The blockage caused an insufficient amount of coolant to enter the fuel assembly; this was not noticed by the operators until the core temperature alarms sounded. Several fuel rod subassemblies reached high temperatures of around 700 °F (370 °C) (with an expected range near 580 °F, 304 °C), causing them to melt.[4]
Following an extended shutdown that involved fuel replacement, repairs to vessel, and cleanup, Fermi 1 restarted in July 1970 and reached full power. Due to lack of funds and aging equipment, it was finally shut down permanently on November 27, 1972, and was officially decommissioned December 31, 1975, under the definition of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). Later, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) replaced the AEC and under their new definitions, Fermi was re-designated as being in SAFSTOR due to some remaining radioactivity at the site. On May 16, 1996, decommissioning was restarted. However, by November 2011 with very little activity remaining, a decision was made to halt further work. It is currently in SAFSTOR.[4]
Fermi 2
editFermi 2 is a 1,202 MWe General Electric boiling water reactor owned and operated by DTE Energy. Plans to build were announced in July 1968. Initial criticality was achieved in July 1985, and full commercial operation commenced on January 23, 1988.[5]
The reactor vessel holds 764 fuel assemblies and 185 control rods which modulate the power. The fuel assemblies are about 6 inches (15 cm) square by about 12 feet (3.7 m) long. The original turbine generator was an English Electric unit. After a turbine blade incident in 1993, the company replaced the turbine with a General Electric unit.[6] Water flowing through the reactor vessel changes to saturated steam and then travels to the main turbine-generator to produce electricity. After that, the steam drops into a main condenser where it is condensed to liquid water and is recycled. A secondary loop of water which enters the tube side of the condenser is non-radioactive. It flows to two large cooling towers which stand 400 feet (120 m) tall where the hot water is cooled by natural circulation with ambient air. This is a closed loop with only a small amount of make-up water needed from Lake Erie to replace any evaporation.
Two 345 kV lines send power to the customers. Those same lines are used to supply electricity to the site's safety equipment. Three additional 120 kV lines are also available to supply any needed back-up power to safety equipment. Additionally, four diesel generators and four combustion turbine generators are on site to power plant safety equipment during an emergency.
Fermi 3
editThe original Fermi 3 project was to be a companion unit identical to Fermi 2. It was ordered in 1972 and cancelled in 1974. See DOE data Archived 2018-07-24 at the Wayback Machine page 67 and WNA Fermi 3 data.
In September 2008, Detroit Edison filed an application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) for a third reactor.[7] The new unit is supposed to be built on the same site, slightly to the southwest of Fermi 2. The reactor design selected is the 1,550 MWe GE-designed passive Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR). Review of the 17,000-page application could take four years, after which construction could take six years. The cost is estimated at as much as $10 billion.[8] CEO Anthony Earley said that DTE's analysis "so far shows that nuclear power will, over the long term, be the most cost-effective baseload option for our customers, ... We expect nuclear to remain the low-cost option, but we will continue to evaluate nuclear against other resources and will commit to proceeding with construction only at the right time and at the right cost".[9]
In March 2009, a coalition of citizen groups asked federal regulators to reject plans for Fermi 3, contending that it would pose a range of threats to public health and the environment. The groups have filed 14 contentions with the NRC, claiming that a new plant would pose "radioactive, toxic and thermal impacts on Lake Erie's vulnerable western basin."[10][11]
In May 2015, the NRC approved a combined construction and operating license for Fermi 3, but DTE Energy stated there were no plans for construction at that time.[12]
Electricity Production
editEnrico Fermi generated 9,369 GWh in 2021.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Annual (Total) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 837,317 | 749,423 | 826,750 | 706,554 | 820,950 | 788,930 | 807,415 | 808,623 | 789,911 | 682,435 | 4,215 | 732,906 | 8,554,429 |
| 2002 | 754,646 | 747,823 | 787,509 | 748,349 | 803,401 | 782,676 | 808,970 | 812,726 | 761,918 | 750,016 | 809,899 | 733,036 | 9,300,969 |
| 2003 | 792,252 | 739,490 | 715,806 | 0 | 511,787 | 794,164 | 815,027 | 647,050 | 634,415 | 829,640 | 808,058 | 831,137 | 8,119,826 |
| 2004 | 806,624 | 780,998 | 820,295 | 800,538 | 819,977 | 788,170 | 798,842 | 559,250 | 690,868 | 823,176 | 120,316 | 639,135 | 8,148,189 |
| 2005 | 638,803 | 580,711 | 836,444 | 795,506 | 824,948 | 651,229 | 382,159 | 808,499 | 787,950 | 817,527 | 803,264 | 829,535 | 8,256,575 |
| 2006 | 826,505 | 741,765 | 628,246 | -4,995 | 351,357 | 575,260 | 298,836 | 778,553 | 795,716 | 834,895 | 811,764 | 839,484 | 8,477,386 |
| 2007 | 834,917 | 758,801 | 833,841 | 803,087 | 824,781 | 787,187 | 809,717 | 808,869 | 733,362 | -4,585 | 295,391 | 828,414 | 8,513,782 |
| 2008 | 824,333 | 686,950 | 832,186 | 801,333 | 823,695 | 782,492 | 808,543 | 812,034 | 783,971 | 825,617 | 803,232 | 829,020 | 9,312,406 |
| 2009 | 831,971 | 738,853 | 683,436 | -6,333 | 790,316 | 701,690 | 808,089 | 804,660 | 753,809 | -12,439 | 482,400 | 829,456 | 7,405,908 |
| 2010 | 826,918 | 749,495 | 623,775 | 793,322 | 813,878 | 479,742 | 795,331 | 794,235 | 778,885 | 618,402 | -5,410 | 469,291 | 7,737,864 |
| 2011 | 534,432 | 333,314 | 838,538 | 805,527 | 817,678 | 785,224 | 800,118 | 799,927 | 785,625 | 826,294 | 735,321 | 828,212 | 9,089,210 |
| 2012 | 834,658 | 777,846 | 656,219 | -4,106 | 653,365 | 600,935 | 37,766 | 524,001 | 419,846 | 538,502 | 96,113 | -12,853 | 5,121,312 |
| 2013 | 537,127 | 489,402 | 529,856 | 432,891 | 357,159 | 512,775 | 522,400 | 526,801 | 275,094 | 789,239 | 791,587 | 834,631 | 6,598,962 |
| 2014 | 758,405 | 199,990 | -7,892 | 418,973 | 835,139 | 803,349 | 832,984 | 831,297 | 675,619 | 824,306 | 829,905 | 790,055 | 7,491,130 |
| 2015 | 858,364 | 773,670 | 488,848 | 717,719 | 838,762 | 800,473 | 827,467 | 824,769 | 311,762 | -4,502 | 36,567 | 856,647 | 7,430,546 |
| 2016 | 850,045 | 777,617 | 809,987 | 775,356 | 528,942 | 795,328 | 820,585 | 735,534 | 781,395 | 843,167 | 579,125 | 849,685 | 9,146,766 |
| 2017 | 835,616 | 703,599 | 456,092 | 257,639 | 812,392 | 813,633 | 837,826 | 837,283 | 815,015 | 843,601 | 742,902 | 736,097 | 8,691,095 |
| 2018 | 852,277 | 769,471 | 858,594 | 352,509 | 548,214 | 804,769 | 801,125 | 829,578 | 556,224 | 81,361 | 822,023 | 135,797 | 7,411,942 |
| 2019 | 785,040 | 778,181 | 854,992 | 824,974 | 843,326 | 801,909 | 829,265 | 834,317 | 806,150 | 849,237 | 833,658 | 845,211 | 9,785,260 |
| 2020 | 835,251 | 789,446 | 542,950 | -4,048 | -4,928 | -10,767 | -12,197 | 605,277 | 816,397 | 826,569 | 825,019 | 861,809 | 6,070,778 |
| 2021 | 862,181 | 778,083 | 848,857 | 854,960 | 606,853 | 805,918 | 720,963 | 823,172 | 804,553 | 833,474 | 816,979 | 613,543 | 9,368,536 |
| 2022 | 447,923 | 61,614 | -4,597 | -4,659 | 428,094 | 707,974 | 834,965 | 835,376 | 807,845 | 854,836 | 830,979 | 861,750 | 6,762,100 |
| 2023 | 858,340 | 776,291 | 858,879 | 826,446 | 849,293 | 806,748 | 796,215 | 460,510 | 589,351 | 849,006 | 827,027 | 857,884 | 9,355,990 |
| 2024 | 634,915 | 694,331 | 594,205 | -3,974 | 498,966 | 811,107 | 837,489 | 837,336 | -- |
Surrounding population
editThe Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[14]
The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) of Enrico Fermi was 4,799,526, a decrease of 3.4 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. Cities within 50 miles (80 km) include Detroit (30 miles (48 km) to city center) and Toledo (27 miles (43 km)). Additional population within 50 miles (80 km) is in Canada, including Windsor, Ontario, 26 miles (42 km).[15]
A 2021 report by the Radiation and Public Health Project (RPHP) found a rise in the rate of death due to cancer with a steadily rising rate in Monroe County during the 2009-2018 decade and attempted to correlate it to Fermi.[16] However numerous studies conducted by respected scientific organizations, such as the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute, have shown that living near nuclear power plants "have no adverse impact on cancer rates" and the NRC has stated that numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies have shown no correlation, and that the RPHP's simple observation of a statistical association does not prove causation.[17] In an op-ed Pete Dietrich, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer at DTE Energy called the report a "dishonest attempt to sway public opinion" and went on to point out that "At all U.S. nuclear plants, including Fermi, radiation is strictly monitored by radiation experts and the NRC."[18]
Seismic risk
editThe Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 2010 estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Fermi was 1 in 238,095 making it the 88th least likely to be damaged of all US nuclear generating stations.[19][20]
Reactor data
editThe Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station consists of one operational reactor, one closed unit and one additional is planned.
| Reactor Unit[21] | Reactor Type | Electrical Generation Capacity | Construction Start | Initial Criticality | Commercial Operation Start | Permanent Shutdown | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | Gross | ||||||
| Fermi 1 | LMFBR | 60 MW | 69 MW | 8/8/1956 | 8/23/1963 | 7/8/1966 | 11/29/1972 |
| Fermi 2 | BWR-4 | 1150 MW | 1202 MW | 9/26/1972 | 7/2/1985 | 1/23/1988 | |
| Fermi 3 (planned)[22] | ESBWR | 1490 MW | 1550 MW | ||||
Notes
edit- ^ "EIA - State Nuclear Profiles". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 3 October 2017.
- ^ "Fermi – Unit 1 | NRC.gov".
- ^ NucNet. McCain Reiterates Support For Nuclear During Enrico Fermi Visit Archived 2011-10-04 at the Wayback Machine. August 8, 2008.
- ^ a b c NRC "Fermi, Unit 1", NRC Website, 3 February 2011, accessed 17 March 2011.
- ^ NRC "Fermi, Unit 2", NRC Website, 13 January 2011, accessed 17 March 2011.
- ^ Bray, Hiawatha (28 December 1993). "Fermi fire could shut down plant 3-6 months - Damage to turbine set off reactor alert". Detroit Free Press.
- ^ "Fermi, Unit 3 Application". U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2008-09-19. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- ^ Lam, Tina (2008-09-19). "DTE applies for another nuclear plant". Detroit Free Press. Archived from the original on January 12, 2015. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- ^ Dolley, Steven (2008-09-18). "Detroit Edison files with NRC for license to build new nuke unit". Platts Nucleonics Week. McGraw-Hill. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- ^ Groups petition against new nuclear plant
- ^ Fermi 3 opposition takes legal action to block new nuclear reactor Archived 2010-03-30 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Regulators OK Fermi 3, but DTE has no plans to build it".
- ^ "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2023-01-07.
- ^ "Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants". Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 2019-12-22.
- ^ "Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors". NBC News. 2011-04-14. Retrieved 2024-08-16.
- ^ Ennis, Tricia (March 11, 2021). "Report: Cancer death rates rising near Fermi nuclear plant". ABC 13. Retrieved 2021-06-30.
- ^ "Radiation Protection and the "Tooth Fairy" Issue" (PDF). nrc.gov. December 2004. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2022.
- ^ Dietrich, Pete (20 June 2021). "Yes: Fermi 2 is safe and real science proves it". The Monroe News. Archived from the original on 21 June 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2022.
- ^ "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk". NBC News. 2011-03-16. Retrieved 2024-08-16.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-25. Retrieved 2011-04-19.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „United States of America: Nuclear Power Reactors- Alphabetic“ Archived June 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „Nuclear Power Reactor Details - ENRICO FERMI-3“
References
edit- We Almost Lost Detroit, John G. Fuller, Ballantine Books, 1976
- Normal Accident, Charles Perrow, Basic Books, 1984
- We Did Not Almost Lose Detroit, Earl M. Page, Published by Detroit Edison Co., 3rd Edition in May 1976
- Some notes written by hands on principal engineer who worked at the site from 1967 to 2006.
- Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Hazards Summary Report
- Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant 236 page booklet published by the Atomic Power Development Associates, Inc. (now defunct) in January 1959
External links
edit
- Public Comments "Public Comments at the meeting re: FERMI 3 with the NRC. This includes youtube videos of speakers calling for an end to the new nuclear reactor project. Featured are a Professor from the U of M, Don't Waste Michigan members, Sierra Club members, and other concerned citizens."