In mathematics, equivariant topology is the study of topological spaces that possess certain symmetries. In studying topological spaces, one often considers continuous maps , and while equivariant topology also considers such maps, there is the additional constraint that each map "respects symmetry" in both its domain and target space.

The notion of symmetry is usually captured by considering a group action of a group on and and requiring that is equivariant under this action, so that for all , a property usually denoted by . Heuristically speaking, standard topology views two spaces as equivalent "up to deformation," while equivariant topology considers spaces equivalent up to deformation so long as it pays attention to any symmetry possessed by both spaces. A famous theorem of equivariant topology is the Borsuk–Ulam theorem, which asserts that every -equivariant map necessarily vanishes.

Induced G-bundles

edit

An important construction used in equivariant cohomology and other applications includes a naturally occurring group bundle (see principal bundle for details).

Let us first consider the case where   acts freely on  . Then, given a  -equivariant map  , we obtain sections   given by  , where   gets the diagonal action  , and the bundle is  , with fiber   and projection given by  . Often, the total space is written  .

More generally, the assignment   actually does not map to   generally. Since   is equivariant, if   (the isotropy subgroup), then by equivariance, we have that  , so in fact   will map to the collection of  . In this case, one can replace the bundle by a homotopy quotient where   acts freely and is bundle homotopic to the induced bundle on   by  .

Applications to discrete geometry

edit

In the same way that one can deduce the ham sandwich theorem from the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem, one can find many applications of equivariant topology to problems of discrete geometry.[1][2] This is accomplished by using the configuration-space test-map paradigm:

Given a geometric problem  , we define the configuration space,  , which parametrizes all associated solutions to the problem (such as points, lines, or arcs.) Additionally, we consider a test space   and a map   where   is a solution to a problem if and only if  . Finally, it is usual to consider natural symmetries in a discrete problem by some group   that acts on   and   so that   is equivariant under these actions. The problem is solved if we can show the nonexistence of an equivariant map  .

Obstructions to the existence of such maps are often formulated algebraically from the topological data of   and  .[3] An archetypal example of such an obstruction can be derived having   a vector space and  . In this case, a nonvanishing map would also induce a nonvanishing section   from the discussion above, so  , the top Stiefel–Whitney class would need to vanish.

Examples

edit
  • The identity map   will always be equivariant.
  • If we let   act antipodally on the unit circle, then   is equivariant, since it is an odd function.
  • Any map   is equivariant when   acts trivially on the quotient, since   for all  .

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Matoušek, Jiří (2003). Using the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem: Lectures on Topological Methods in Combinatorics and Geometry. Universitext. Springer.
  2. ^ Goodman, Jacob E.; O'Rourke, Joseph, eds. (2004-04-15). Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, Second Edition (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN 9781584883012.
  3. ^ Matschke, Benjamin. "Equivariant topology methods In discrete geometry" (PDF).