The evolution of nervous systems dates back to the first development of nervous systems in animals (or metazoans). Neurons developed as specialized electrical signaling cells in multicellular animals, adapting the mechanism of action potentials present in motile single-celled and colonial eukaryotes. Primitive systems, like those found in protists, use chemical signalling for movement and sensitivity; data suggests these were precursors to modern neural cell types and their synapses.[1] When some animals started living a mobile lifestyle and eating larger food particles externally, they developed ciliated epithelia, contractile muscles and coordinating & sensitive neurons for it in their outer layer.[2][3]
Simple nerve nets seen in acoels (basal bilaterians) and cnidarians are thought to be the ancestral condition for the Planulozoa (bilaterians plus cnidarians and, perhaps, placozoans). A more complex nerve net with simple nerve cords is present in ancient animals called ctenophores[4] but no nerves, thus no nervous systems, are present in another group of ancient animals, the sponges (Porifera). Due to the common presence and similarity of some neural genes in these ancient animals and their protist relatives, the controversy of whether ctenophores or sponges diverged earlier, and the recent discovery of "neuroid" cells specialized in coordination of digestive choanocytes in Spongilla, the origin of neurons in the phylogenetic tree of life is still disputed.[5][6][7] Further cephalization and nerve cord (ventral and dorsal) evolution occurred many times independently in bilaterians.[5]
Neural precursors
editAction potentials, which are necessary for neural activity, evolved in single-celled eukaryotes. These use calcium rather than sodium action potentials, but the mechanism was probably adapted into neural electrical signaling in multicellular animals. In some colonial eukaryotes, such as Obelia, electrical signals propagate not only through neural nets, but also through epithelial cells in the shared digestive system of the colony.[8] Several non-metazoan phyla, including choanoflagellates, filasterea, and mesomycetozoea, have been found to have synaptic protein homologs, including secretory SNAREs, Shank, and Homer. In choanoflagellates and mesomycetozoea, these proteins are upregulated during colonial phases, suggesting the importance of these proto-synaptic proteins for cell to cell communication.[9] The history of ideas on how neurons and the first nervous systems emerged in evolution has been discussed in a 2015 book by Michel Antcil.[10] In 2022 two proteins SMIM20 and NUCB2, that are precursors of the neuropeptides phoenixin and nesfatin-1 respectively have been found to have deep homology across all lineages that preceded creatures with central nervous systems, bilaterians, cnidarians, ctenophores, and sponges as well as in choanoflagellates.[11][12]
Sponges
editSponges have no cells connected to each other by synaptic junctions, that is, no neurons, and therefore no nervous system. They do, however, have homologs of many genes that play key roles in synaptic function. Recent studies have shown that sponge cells express a group of proteins that cluster together to form a structure resembling a postsynaptic density (the signal-receiving part of a synapse).[13] However, the function of this structure is currently unclear. Although sponge cells do not show synaptic transmission, they do communicate with each other via calcium waves and other impulses, which mediate some simple actions such as whole-body contraction.[14] Other ways sponge cells communicate with neighboring cells is through vesicular transport across highly dense regions of the cell membranes. These vesicles carry ions and other signaling molecules, but contain no true synaptic function.[15]
Nerve nets
editJellyfish, comb jellies, and related animals have diffuse nerve nets rather than a central nervous system. In most jellyfish the nerve net is spread more or less evenly across the body; in comb jellies it is concentrated near the mouth. The nerve nets consist of sensory neurons that pick up chemical, tactile, and visual signals, motor neurons that can activate contractions of the body wall, and intermediate neurons that detect patterns of activity in the sensory neurons and send signals to groups of motor neurons as a result. In some cases groups of intermediate neurons are clustered into discrete ganglia.[16]
The development of the nervous system in radiata is relatively unstructured. Unlike bilaterians, radiata only have two primordial cell layers, endoderm and ectoderm. Neurons are generated from a special set of ectodermal precursor cells, which also serve as precursors for every other ectodermal cell type.[17]
Nerve cords
edit
The vast majority of existing animals are bilaterians, meaning animals with left and right sides that are approximate mirror images of each other. All bilateria are thought to have descended from a common wormlike ancestor that appeared in the Cryogenian period, 700–650 million years ago.[18] The fundamental bilaterian body form is a tube with a hollow gut cavity running from mouth to anus, and a nerve cord with an especially large ganglion at the front, called the "brain".
Even mammals, including humans, show the segmented bilaterian body plan at the level of the nervous system. The spinal cord contains a series of segmental ganglia, each giving rise to motor and sensory nerves that innervate a portion of the body surface and underlying musculature. On the limbs, the layout of the innervation pattern is complex, but on the trunk it gives rise to a series of narrow bands. The top three segments belong to the brain, giving rise to the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain.[19]
Bilaterians can be divided, based on events that occur very early in embryonic development, into two groups (superphyla) called protostomes and deuterostomes.[20] Deuterostomes include vertebrates as well as echinoderms and hemichordates (mainly acorn worms). Protostomes, the more diverse group, include arthropods, molluscs, and numerous types of worms. There is a basic difference between the two groups in the placement of the nervous system within the body: protostomes possess a nerve cord on the ventral (usually bottom) side of the body, whereas in deuterostomes the nerve cord is on the dorsal (usually top) side. In fact, numerous aspects of the body are inverted between the two groups, including the expression patterns of several genes that show dorsal-to-ventral gradients. Some anatomists now consider that the bodies of protostomes and deuterostomes are "flipped over" with respect to each other, a hypothesis that was first proposed by Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire for insects in comparison to vertebrates. Thus insects, for example, have nerve cords that run along the ventral midline of the body, while all vertebrates have spinal cords that run along the dorsal midline.[21] But recent molecular data from different protostomes and deuterostomes reject this scenario and suggest that nerve cords independently evolved in both.[22]
Annelida
editEarthworms have dual nerve cords running along the length of the body and merging at the tail and the mouth. These nerve cords are connected by transverse nerves like the rungs of a ladder. These transverse nerves help coordinate the two sides of the animal. Two ganglia at the head end function similar to a simple brain. Photoreceptors on the animal's eyespots provide sensory information on light and dark.[23]
Nematoda
editThe nervous system of one very small worm, the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, has been mapped out down to the synaptic level. Every neuron and its cellular lineage has been recorded and most, if not all, of the neural connections are known. In this species, the nervous system is sexually dimorphic; the nervous systems of the two sexes, males and hermaphrodites, have different numbers of neurons and groups of neurons that perform sex-specific functions. In C. elegans, males have exactly 383 neurons, while hermaphrodites have exactly 302 neurons.[24]
Arthropods
edit
Arthropods, such as insects and crustaceans, have a nervous system made up of a series of ganglia, connected by a ventral nerve cord made up of two parallel connectives running along the length of the belly.[25] Typically, each body segment has one ganglion on each side, though some ganglia are fused to form the brain and other large ganglia. The head segment contains the brain, also known as the supraesophageal ganglion. In the insect nervous system, the brain is anatomically divided into the protocerebrum, deutocerebrum, and tritocerebrum. Immediately behind the brain is the subesophageal ganglion, which is composed of three pairs of fused ganglia. It controls the mouthparts, the salivary glands and certain muscles. Many arthropods have well-developed sensory organs, including compound eyes for vision and antennae for olfaction and pheromone sensation. The sensory information from these organs is processed by the brain.
In insects, many neurons have cell bodies that are positioned at the edge of the brain and are electrically passive—the cell bodies serve only to provide metabolic support and do not participate in signalling. A protoplasmic fiber runs from the cell body and branches profusely, with some parts transmitting signals and other parts receiving signals. Thus, most parts of the insect brain have passive cell bodies arranged around the periphery, while the neural signal processing takes place in a tangle of protoplasmic fibers called neuropil, in the interior.[26]
Evolution of central nervous systems
editEvolution of the human brain
editThere has been a gradual increase in brain volume as the ancestors of modern humans progressed along the human timeline of evolution (see Homininae), starting from about 600 cm3 in Homo habilis up to 1736 cm3 in Homo neanderthalensis. Thus, in general there is a correlation between brain volume and intelligence.[27] However, modern Homo sapiens have a smaller brain volume (brain size 1250 cm3) than neanderthals; women have a brain volume slightly smaller than men, and the Flores hominids (Homo floresiensis), nicknamed "hobbits", had a cranial capacity of about 380 cm3, about a third of the Homo erectus average and considered small for a chimpanzee. It is proposed that they evolved from H. erectus as a case of insular dwarfism. In spite of their threefold smaller brain there is evidence that H. floresiensis used fire and made stone tools as sophisticated as those of their proposed ancestor, H. erectus.[28] Iain Davidson summarizes the opposite evolutionary constraints on human brain size as "As large as you need and as small as you can".[29] The human brain has evolved around the metabolic, environmental, and social needs that the species has dealt with throughout its existence. As hominid species evolved with increased brain size and processing power, the overall metabolic need increased. Compared to chimpanzees, humans consume more calories from animals than from plants. While not certain, studies have shown that this shift in diet is due to the increased need for the fatty acids more readily found in animal products[citation needed]. These fatty acids are essential for brain maintenance and development. Other factors to consider are the need for social interaction and how hominids have interacted with their environments over time.[30]
Brain evolution can be studied using endocasts, a branch of neurology and paleontology called paleoneurology.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "nervous system | Definition, Function, Structure, & Facts". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 2021-04-07.
- ^ Arendt, D. (2021). Elementary Nervous Systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376 (1821), 20200347. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0347
- ^ Arendt, D., Benito-Gutierrez, E., Brunet, T., & Marlow, H. (2015). Gastric pouches and the mucociliary sole: Setting the stage for nervous system evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370 (1684), 20150286. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0286
- ^ Jékely, G., Paps, J. & Nielsen, C. The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems. EvoDevo 6, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-6-1
- ^ a b Moroz, L. L., Romanova, D. Y., & Kohn, A. B. (2021). Neural versus alternative integrative systems: Molecular insights into origins of neurotransmitters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376 (1821), 20190762. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0762
- ^ Musser, J. M., Schippers, K. J., Nickel, M. et al. (2021). Profiling cellular diversity in sponges informs animal cell type and nervous system evolution. Science, 374 (6568), 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj2949
- ^ Hayakawa, E., Guzman, C., Horiguchi, O. et al. Mass spectrometry of short peptides reveals common features of metazoan peptidergic neurons. Nat Ecol Evol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01835-7
- ^ Matthews GG (2001). "Evolution of nervous systems". Neurobiology: molecules, cells, and systems. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-632-04496-2.
- ^ Burkhardt P, Sprecher SG (October 2017). "Evolutionary origin of synapses and neurons - Bridging the gap". BioEssays. 39 (10): 1700024. doi:10.1002/bies.201700024. PMID 28863228.
- ^ Anctil M (2015). Dawn of the Neuron: The Early Struggles to Trace the Origin of Nervous Systems. Montreal & Kingston, London, Chicago: McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 978-0-7735-4571-7.
- ^ Yañez-Guerra LA, Thiel D, Jékely G (April 2022). O'Connell M (ed.). "Premetazoan Origin of Neuropeptide Signaling". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 39 (4): msac051. doi:10.1093/molbev/msac051. PMC 9004410. PMID 35277960.
- ^ Callier V (2022-06-03). "Brain-Signal Proteins Evolved Before Animals Did". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 2022-06-03.
- ^ Sakarya O, Armstrong KA, Adamska M, Adamski M, Wang IF, Tidor B, et al. (June 2007). Vosshall L (ed.). "A post-synaptic scaffold at the origin of the animal kingdom". PLOS ONE. 2 (6): e506. Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..506S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000506. PMC 1876816. PMID 17551586.
- ^ Jacobs DK, Nakanishi N, Yuan D, Camara A, Nichols SA, Hartenstein V (November 2007). "Evolution of sensory structures in basal metazoa". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 47 (5): 712–723. doi:10.1093/icb/icm094. PMID 21669752.
- ^ Leys SP (February 2015). "Elements of a 'nervous system' in sponges". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 218 (Pt 4): 581–591. doi:10.1242/jeb.110817. PMID 25696821.
- ^ Ruppert EE, Fox RS, Barnes RD (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7th ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 111–124. ISBN 978-0-03-025982-1.
- ^ Sanes DH, Reh TA, Harris WA (2006). Development of the nervous system. Academic Press. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-0-12-618621-5.
- ^ Balavoine G, Adoutte A (February 2003). "The segmented urbilateria: a testable scenario". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 43 (1): 137–147. doi:10.1093/icb/43.1.137. PMID 21680418.
- ^ Ghysen A (2003). "The origin and evolution of the nervous system". The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 47 (7–8): 555–562. PMID 14756331.
- ^ Erwin DH, Davidson EH (July 2002). "The last common bilaterian ancestor". Development. 129 (13): 3021–3032. doi:10.1242/dev.129.13.3021. PMID 12070079.
- ^ Lichtneckert R, Reichert H (May 2005). "Insights into the urbilaterian brain: conserved genetic patterning mechanisms in insect and vertebrate brain development". Heredity. 94 (5): 465–477. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800664. PMID 15770230.
- ^ Martín-Durán JM, Pang K, Børve A, Lê HS, Furu A, Cannon JT, et al. (January 2018). "Convergent evolution of bilaterian nerve cords". Nature. 553 (7686): 45–50. Bibcode:2018Natur.553...45M. doi:10.1038/nature25030. PMC 5756474. PMID 29236686.
- ^ Adey WR (February 1951). "The nervous system of the earthworm Megascolex". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 94 (1): 57–103. doi:10.1002/cne.900940104. PMID 14814220. S2CID 30827888.
- ^ "Specification of the nervous system". Wormbook.
- ^ Chapman RF (1998). "Ch. 20: Nervous system". The insects: structure and function. Cambridge University Press. pp. 533–568. ISBN 978-0-521-57890-5.
- ^ Chapman, p. 546
- ^ Ko KH (2016). "Origins of human intelligence: The chain of tool-making and brain evolution" (PDF). Anthropological Notebooks. 22 (1): 5–22.
- ^ Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Saptomo EW, Due RA (October 2004). "A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia" (PDF). Nature. 431 (7012): 1055–1061. Bibcode:2004Natur.431.1055B. doi:10.1038/nature02999. PMID 15514638. S2CID 26441.
- ^ Davidson I (2007). "As large as you need and as small as you can": Implications of the brain size of Homo floresiensis". In Schalley AC, Khlentzos D (eds.). Mental States Volume 1: Evolution, function, nature. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub. Co. pp. 35–42. ISBN 978-90-272-9121-9.
- ^ Barrickman NL (2017-01-01). "4.04 – Energetics, Life History, and Human Brain Evolution". In Kaas JH (ed.). Evolution of Nervous Systems (Second ed.). Oxford: Academic Press. pp. 51–62. ISBN 978-0-12-804096-6.