Exhaustion by compact sets

In mathematics, especially general topology and analysis, an exhaustion by compact sets[1] of a topological space is a nested sequence of compact subsets of ; i.e.

such that is contained in the interior of , i.e. for each and .

For example, consider and the sequence of closed balls For a locally compact Hausdorff space that is a countable union of compact subsets, we can construct an exhaustion as follows. We write as a union of compact sets . Then inductively choose open sets with compact closures, where . Then is a required exhaustion. For a locally compact Hausdorff space that is second-countable, a similar argument can be used to construct an exhaustion.

Occasionally some authors drop the requirement that is in the interior of , but then the property becomes the same as the space being σ-compact, namely a countable union of compact subsets. For example, is σ-compact but does not admit an exhaustion by compact sets since it is not locally compact.

Application

edit

For a Hausdorff space  , an exhaustion by compact sets can be used to show the space is paracompact.[2] Indeed, suppose we have an increasing sequence   of open subsets such that   and each   is compact and is contained in  . Let   be an open cover of  . We also let  . Then, for each  ,   is an open cover of the compact set   and thus admits a finite subcover  . Then   is a locally finite refinement of  

Remark: The proof in fact shows that each open cover admits a countable refinement consisting of open sets with compact closures and each of whose members intersects only finitely many others.[2]

The following type of converse also holds. A paracompact locally compact Hausdorff space with countably many connected components is a countable union of compact sets[3] and thus admits an exhaustion by compact subsets.

Relation to other properties

edit

A space admitting an exhaustion by compact sets is called exhaustible by compact sets.[citation needed]

The following are equivalent for a topological space  :[4]

  1.   is exhaustible by compact sets.
  2.   is σ-compact and weakly locally compact.
  3.   is Lindelöf and weakly locally compact.

(where weakly locally compact means locally compact in the weak sense that each point has a compact neighborhood).

The hemicompact property is intermediate between exhaustible by compact sets and σ-compact. Every space exhaustible by compact sets is hemicompact[5] and every hemicompact space is σ-compact, but the reverse implications do not hold. For example, the Arens-Fort space and the Appert space are hemicompact, but not exhaustible by compact sets (because not weakly locally compact),[6] and the set   of rational numbers with the usual topology is σ-compact, but not hemicompact.[7]

Every regular space that is a countable union of compact sets is paracompact.[citation needed]

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Lee 2011, p. 110.
  2. ^ a b Warner, Ch. 1. Lemma 1.9.
  3. ^ Wall, Proposition A.2.8. (ii) NB: the proof in the reference looks problematic. It can be fixed by constructing an open cover whose member intersects only finitely many others. (Then we use the fact that a locally finite connected graph is countable.)
  4. ^ "A question about local compactness and $\sigma$-compactness". Mathematics Stack Exchange.
  5. ^ "Does locally compact and $\sigma$-compact non-Hausdorff space imply hemicompact?". Mathematics Stack Exchange.
  6. ^ "Can a hemicompact space fail to be weakly locally compact?". Mathematics Stack Exchange.
  7. ^ "A $\sigma$-compact but not hemicompact space?". Mathematics Stack Exchange.

References

edit
edit