Faà di Bruno's formula

(Redirected from Faa di Bruno's formula)

Faà di Bruno's formula is an identity in mathematics generalizing the chain rule to higher derivatives. It is named after Francesco Faà di Bruno (1855, 1857), although he was not the first to state or prove the formula. In 1800, more than 50 years before Faà di Bruno, the French mathematician Louis François Antoine Arbogast had stated the formula in a calculus textbook,[1] which is considered to be the first published reference on the subject.[2]

Perhaps the most well-known form of Faà di Bruno's formula says that

where the sum is over all -tuples of nonnegative integers satisfying the constraint

Sometimes, to give it a memorable pattern, it is written in a way in which the coefficients that have the combinatorial interpretation discussed below are less explicit:

Combining the terms with the same value of and noticing that has to be zero for leads to a somewhat simpler formula expressed in terms of partial (or incomplete) exponential Bell polynomials , :

Combinatorial form

edit

The formula has a "combinatorial" form:

 

where

  •   runs through the set   of all partitions of the set  ,
  • " " means the variable   runs through the list of all of the "blocks" of the partition  , and
  •   denotes the cardinality of the set   (so that   is the number of blocks in the partition   and   is the size of the block  ).

Example

edit

The following is a concrete explanation of the combinatorial form for the   case.

 

The pattern is:

 

The factor   corresponds to the partition 2 + 1 + 1 of the integer 4, in the obvious way. The factor   that goes with it corresponds to the fact that there are three summands in that partition. The coefficient 6 that goes with those factors corresponds to the fact that there are exactly six partitions of a set of four members that break it into one part of size 2 and two parts of size 1.

Similarly, the factor   in the third line corresponds to the partition 2 + 2 of the integer 4, (4, because we are finding the fourth derivative), while   corresponds to the fact that there are two summands (2 + 2) in that partition. The coefficient 3 corresponds to the fact that there are   ways of partitioning 4 objects into groups of 2. The same concept applies to the others.

A memorizable scheme is as follows:

 

Variations

edit

Multivariate version

edit

Let  . Then the following identity holds regardless of whether the   variables are all distinct, or all identical, or partitioned into several distinguishable classes of indistinguishable variables (if it seems opaque, see the very concrete example below):[3]

 

where (as above)

  •   runs through the set   of all partitions of the set  ,
  • " " means the variable   runs through the list of all of the "blocks" of the partition  , and
  •   denotes the cardinality of the set   (so that   is the number of blocks in the partition   and

  is the size of the block  ).

More general versions hold for cases where the all functions are vector- and even Banach-space-valued. In this case one needs to consider the Fréchet derivative or Gateaux derivative.

Example

The five terms in the following expression correspond in the obvious way to the five partitions of the set  , and in each case the order of the derivative of   is the number of parts in the partition:

 

If the three variables are indistinguishable from each other, then three of the five terms above are also indistinguishable from each other, and then we have the classic one-variable formula.

Formal power series version

edit

Suppose   and   are formal power series and  .

Then the composition   is again a formal power series,

 

where   and the other coefficient   for   can be expressed as a sum over compositions of   or as an equivalent sum over integer partitions of  :

 

where

 

is the set of compositions of   with   denoting the number of parts,

or

 

where

 

is the set of partitions of   into   parts, in frequency-of-parts form.

The first form is obtained by picking out the coefficient of   in   "by inspection", and the second form is then obtained by collecting like terms, or alternatively, by applying the multinomial theorem.

The special case  ,   gives the exponential formula. The special case  ,   gives an expression for the reciprocal of the formal power series   in the case  .

Stanley[4] gives a version for exponential power series. In the formal power series

 

we have the  th derivative at 0:

 

This should not be construed as the value of a function, since these series are purely formal; there is no such thing as convergence or divergence in this context.

If

 

and

 

and

 

then the coefficient   (which would be the  th derivative of   evaluated at 0 if we were dealing with convergent series rather than formal power series) is given by

 

where   runs through the set of all partitions of the set   and   are the blocks of the partition  , and   is the number of members of the  th block, for  .

This version of the formula is particularly well suited to the purposes of combinatorics.

We can also write with respect to the notation above

 

where   are Bell polynomials.

A special case

edit

If  , then all of the derivatives of   are the same and are a factor common to every term:

 

where   is the nth complete exponential Bell polynomial.

In case   is a cumulant-generating function, then   is a moment-generating function, and the polynomial in various derivatives of   is the polynomial that expresses the moments as functions of the cumulants.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ (Arbogast 1800).
  2. ^ According to Craik (2005, pp. 120–122): see also the analysis of Arbogast's work by Johnson (2002, p. 230).
  3. ^ Hardy, Michael (2006). "Combinatorics of Partial Derivatives". Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 13 (1): R1. doi:10.37236/1027. S2CID 478066.
  4. ^ See the "compositional formula" in Chapter 5 of Stanley, Richard P. (1999) [1997]. Enumerative Combinatorics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-55309-4.

References

edit

Historical surveys and essays

edit

Research works

edit
edit