This isn't 2C-T-7 pictured, it's 3,5-dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine
- The image depicts 2,5-dimethoxy... not 3,5-dimethoxy... which appears to be the correct substitution pattern. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
This isn't 2C-T-7 pictured, it's 3,5-dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine