I don't understand. Someone has added: {{di-no license}} to this file which gives dire warnings about the copyright status for this image & saying it will be deleted if the copyright status is not clarified. How is this image any different to the thousands of album-cover images on Wikipedia? Go to any one at random - say, The Rolling Stones' first album The Rolling Stones (album) & have a look at the album-cover image file. It has less information than was provided for this image, and yet the page has the following: {{Non-free album cover}} What is the difference as regards copyright status between these two record-cover images? Why is there a threat to get rid of this one and an acknowledgment of "fair use" for the other. Ikeshut (talk) 03:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- The reason this file was tagged with the "no-licence" tag is because you failed to add the "non-free album cover" tag to the images page which is a neccessity to all images uploaded to wikipedia. Salavat (talk) 03:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
