File talk:Ellie Goulding - Your Song.png
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SnapSnap in topic Speedy deletion contested
![]() | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Speedy deletion contested
editPlease be advised that the speedy deletion of this file has been contested at WP:MCQ#Non-free album covers. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Just dropping by to summarize/complement the discussion mentioned above. The article in question (Your Song) includes information on two independently notable cover versions of the original song. WP:NFCC#3a states:
Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information.
Only one non-free artwork (that of the original song) is not sufficient when the two cover versions are notable enough to warrant an accompanying artwork, and their omissions would be detrimental to readers' understanding of the topic (WP:NFCC#8). The file has been tagged for speedy deletion because, as Maxinvestigator pointed out, said file "is not used in the main infobox" (as stated in the default text used in the "Purpose" parameter of {{Non-free use rationale album cover}}). I've revised the non-free use rationale to better reflect how the file is being used to specifically illustrate the cover version, but Maxinvestigator still refuses to budge. At the risk of entering WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS territory, it has always been customary to include multiple non-free cover arts in song articles that contain information on notable cover versions – and no one seems to bat an eyelash. I really don't see a valid reason why Your Song should be singled out, especially by a user who has barely contributed to English Wikipedia. snapsnap (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)