 | This file is rated FM-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This person is utterly unremarkable and has no place in an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.88.132.210 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 20 June 2008
- This encyclopedia is for everyone who is worth a mention in the footnote of life, an accomplished supermodel, whether you feel being a supermodel is a pointless thing or not, is worth a mention. I thought this was an unusual choice for featured picture, but I support it. SwK (talk) 12:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I think the featured picture should be chosen solely based on the remarkable qualities of the picture. Many have been featured, like this one, which have little aesthetic value to me. But people voted for it. And that's what this thing is all about.Merryjman (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I took a second look at it, and realized that the pattern that her shadows make from all the lights is actually pretty cool. I would have voted for it.Merryjman (talk) 18:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
edit
Well thank you for the remark, whoever you are. Now i feel enlightened. She is unremarkable, you say? Yes surely, when we have featured pictures of hockey players, old military leaders, retired politicians, and the Chieftain of the Hamburg police department, there surely should be no such thing so ordinary/unremarkable as a supermodel. What was they thinking? Andy McDandy (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
