image should be delete. violates WP:V#SELF. As this section explains ...blogs are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published material may be acceptable when produced by a well-known, professional researcher in a relevant field or a well-known professional journalist. simonwoodside.com not well-known professional researcher or well-known professional journalist. 72.36.251.234 05:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- The solution is not to delete it, but try to find reliable sources for it. Only in the case in which those sources contradict the information presented in this image, it should be deleted or modified. bogdan 10:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- if popular wikipedia opinion in favor of conclusion drawn in violation of WP:V#SELF wikipedia keep and if popular wikipedia opinion in opposition to conclusion drawn in violation of WP:V#SELF wikipedia delete? they both violation of WP:NOR and WP:V#SELF and policy should not make exempt for site u like - should be all or none 72.36.251.234 16:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
