Preemptively, I'd like to ask that the resolution of this image not be reduced. It is larger than many fair use images. However, it is smaller than the actual size of the album and somewhat grainy as well. But the most important reason I feel this way is that at smaller resolutions, it is difficult to see the slabs of meat, which was an important component of the controversy over this image. Cheers, GentlemanGhost 07:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Too bad no one paid attention to my request. The old image has now been replaced with a new inferior one. The current iteration, while still larger than 220 pixels in width, has some terrible aliasing. I will seek a suitable replacement. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:40, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I have replaced the image. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
