In mathematical analysis, a function of bounded variation, also known as BV function, is a real-valued function whose total variation is bounded (finite): the graph of a function having this property is well behaved in a precise sense. For a continuous function of a single variable, being of bounded variation means that the distance along the direction of the y-axis, neglecting the contribution of motion along x-axis, traveled by a point moving along the graph has a finite value. For a continuous function of several variables, the meaning of the definition is the same, except for the fact that the continuous path to be considered cannot be the whole graph of the given function (which is a hypersurface in this case), but can be every intersection of the graph itself with a hyperplane (in the case of functions of two variables, a plane) parallel to a fixed x-axis and to the y-axis.

Functions of bounded variation are precisely those with respect to which one may find Riemann–Stieltjes integrals of all continuous functions.

Another characterization states that the functions of bounded variation on a compact interval are exactly those f which can be written as a difference g − h, where both g and h are bounded monotone. In particular, a BV function may have discontinuities, but at most countably many.

In the case of several variables, a function f defined on an open subset Ω of is said to have bounded variation if its distributional derivative is a vector-valued finite Radon measure.

One of the most important aspects of functions of bounded variation is that they form an algebra of discontinuous functions whose first derivative exists almost everywhere: due to this fact, they can and frequently are used to define generalized solutions of nonlinear problems involving functionals, ordinary and partial differential equations in mathematics, physics and engineering.

We have the following chains of inclusions for continuous functions over a closed, bounded interval of the real line:

Continuously differentiableLipschitz continuousabsolutely continuouscontinuous and bounded variationdifferentiable almost everywhere

History

edit

According to Boris Golubov, BV functions of a single variable were first introduced by Camille Jordan, in the paper (Jordan 1881) dealing with the convergence of Fourier series. The first successful step in the generalization of this concept to functions of several variables was due to Leonida Tonelli,[1] who introduced a class of continuous BV functions in 1926 (Cesari 1986, pp. 47–48), to extend his direct method for finding solutions to problems in the calculus of variations in more than one variable. Ten years after, in (Cesari 1936), Lamberto Cesari changed the continuity requirement in Tonelli's definition to a less restrictive integrability requirement, obtaining for the first time the class of functions of bounded variation of several variables in its full generality: as Jordan did before him, he applied the concept to resolve of a problem concerning the convergence of Fourier series, but for functions of two variables. After him, several authors applied BV functions to study Fourier series in several variables, geometric measure theory, calculus of variations, and mathematical physics. Renato Caccioppoli and Ennio De Giorgi used them to define measure of nonsmooth boundaries of sets (see the entry "Caccioppoli set" for further information). Olga Arsenievna Oleinik introduced her view of generalized solutions for nonlinear partial differential equations as functions from the space BV in the paper (Oleinik 1957), and was able to construct a generalized solution of bounded variation of a first order partial differential equation in the paper (Oleinik 1959): few years later, Edward D. Conway and Joel A. Smoller applied BV-functions to the study of a single nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equation of first order in the paper (Conway & Smoller 1966), proving that the solution of the Cauchy problem for such equations is a function of bounded variation, provided the initial value belongs to the same class. Aizik Isaakovich Vol'pert developed extensively a calculus for BV functions: in the paper (Vol'pert 1967) he proved the chain rule for BV functions and in the book (Hudjaev & Vol'pert 1985) he, jointly with his pupil Sergei Ivanovich Hudjaev, explored extensively the properties of BV functions and their application. His chain rule formula was later extended by Luigi Ambrosio and Gianni Dal Maso in the paper (Ambrosio & Dal Maso 1990).

Formal definition

edit

BV functions of one variable

edit

Definition 1.1. The total variation of a real-valued (or more generally complex-valued) function f, defined on an interval   is the quantity

 

where the supremum is taken over the set   of all partitions of the interval considered.

If f is differentiable and its derivative is Riemann-integrable, its total variation is the vertical component of the arc-length of its graph, that is to say,

 

Definition 1.2. A real-valued function   on the real line is said to be of bounded variation (BV function) on a chosen interval   if its total variation is finite, i.e.

 

It can be proved that a real function   is of bounded variation in   if and only if it can be written as the difference   of two non-decreasing functions   and   on  : this result is known as the Jordan decomposition of a function and it is related to the Jordan decomposition of a measure.

Through the Stieltjes integral, any function of bounded variation on a closed interval   defines a bounded linear functional on  . In this special case,[2] the Riesz–Markov–Kakutani representation theorem states that every bounded linear functional arises uniquely in this way. The normalized positive functionals or probability measures correspond to positive non-decreasing lower semicontinuous functions. This point of view has been important in spectral theory,[3] in particular in its application to ordinary differential equations.

BV functions of several variables

edit

Functions of bounded variation, BV functions, are functions whose distributional derivative is a finite[4] Radon measure. More precisely:

Definition 2.1. Let   be an open subset of  . A function   belonging to   is said of bounded variation (BV function), and written

 

if there exists a finite vector Radon measure   such that the following equality holds

 

that is,   defines a linear functional on the space   of continuously differentiable vector functions   of compact support contained in  : the vector measure   represents therefore the distributional or weak gradient of  .

BV can be defined equivalently in the following way.

Definition 2.2. Given a function   belonging to  , the total variation of  [5] in   is defined as

 

where   is the essential supremum norm. Sometimes, especially in the theory of Caccioppoli sets, the following notation is used

 

in order to emphasize that   is the total variation of the distributional / weak gradient of  . This notation reminds also that if   is of class   (i.e. a continuous and differentiable function having continuous derivatives) then its variation is exactly the integral of the absolute value of its gradient.

The space of functions of bounded variation (BV functions) can then be defined as

 

The two definitions are equivalent since if   then

 

therefore   defines a continuous linear functional on the space  . Since   as a linear subspace, this continuous linear functional can be extended continuously and linearly to the whole   by the Hahn–Banach theorem. Hence the continuous linear functional defines a Radon measure by the Riesz–Markov–Kakutani representation theorem.

Locally BV functions

edit

If the function space of locally integrable functions, i.e. functions belonging to  , is considered in the preceding definitions 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 instead of the one of globally integrable functions, then the function space defined is that of functions of locally bounded variation. Precisely, developing this idea for definition 2.2, a local variation is defined as follows,

 

for every set  , having defined   as the set of all precompact open subsets of   with respect to the standard topology of finite-dimensional vector spaces, and correspondingly the class of functions of locally bounded variation is defined as

 

Notation

edit

There are basically two distinct conventions for the notation of spaces of functions of locally or globally bounded variation, and unfortunately they are quite similar: the first one, which is the one adopted in this entry, is used for example in references Giusti (1984) (partially), Hudjaev & Vol'pert (1985) (partially), Giaquinta, Modica & Souček (1998) and is the following one

  •   identifies the space of functions of globally bounded variation
  •   identifies the space of functions of locally bounded variation

The second one, which is adopted in references Vol'pert (1967) and Maz'ya (1985) (partially), is the following:

  •   identifies the space of functions of globally bounded variation
  •   identifies the space of functions of locally bounded variation

Basic properties

edit

Only the properties common to functions of one variable and to functions of several variables will be considered in the following, and proofs will be carried on only for functions of several variables since the proof for the case of one variable is a straightforward adaptation of the several variables case: also, in each section it will be stated if the property is shared also by functions of locally bounded variation or not. References (Giusti 1984, pp. 7–9), (Hudjaev & Vol'pert 1985) and (Màlek et al. 1996) are extensively used.

BV functions have only jump-type or removable discontinuities

edit

In the case of one variable, the assertion is clear: for each point   in the interval   of definition of the function  , either one of the following two assertions is true

 
 

while both limits exist and are finite. In the case of functions of several variables, there are some premises to understand: first of all, there is a continuum of directions along which it is possible to approach a given point   belonging to the domain   . It is necessary to make precise a suitable concept of limit: choosing a unit vector   it is possible to divide   in two sets

 

Then for each point   belonging to the domain   of the BV function  , only one of the following two assertions is true

 
 

or   belongs to a subset of   having zero  -dimensional Hausdorff measure. The quantities

 

are called approximate limits of the BV function   at the point  .

V(⋅, Ω) is lower semi-continuous on L1(Ω)

edit

The functional   is lower semi-continuous: to see this, choose a Cauchy sequence of BV-functions   converging to  . Then, since all the functions of the sequence and their limit function are integrable and by the definition of lower limit

 

Now considering the supremum on the set of functions   such that   then the following inequality holds true

 

which is exactly the definition of lower semicontinuity.

BV(Ω) is a Banach space

edit

By definition   is a subset of  , while linearity follows from the linearity properties of the defining integral i.e.

 

for all   therefore  for all  , and

 

for all  , therefore   for all  , and all  . The proved vector space properties imply that   is a vector subspace of  . Consider now the function   defined as

 

where   is the usual   norm: it is easy to prove that this is a norm on  . To see that   is complete respect to it, i.e. it is a Banach space, consider a Cauchy sequence   in  . By definition it is also a Cauchy sequence in   and therefore has a limit   in  : since   is bounded in   for each  , then   by lower semicontinuity of the variation  , therefore   is a BV function. Finally, again by lower semicontinuity, choosing an arbitrary small positive number  

 

From this we deduce that   is continuous because it's a norm.

BV(Ω) is not separable

edit

To see this, it is sufficient to consider the following example belonging to the space  :[6] for each 0 < α < 1 define

 

as the characteristic function of the left-closed interval  . Then, choosing   such that   the following relation holds true:

 

Now, in order to prove that every dense subset of   cannot be countable, it is sufficient to see that for every   it is possible to construct the balls

 

Obviously those balls are pairwise disjoint, and also are an indexed family of sets whose index set is  . This implies that this family has the cardinality of the continuum: now, since every dense subset of   must have at least a point inside each member of this family, its cardinality is at least that of the continuum and therefore cannot a be countable subset.[7] This example can be obviously extended to higher dimensions, and since it involves only local properties, it implies that the same property is true also for  .

Chain rule for locally BV(Ω) functions

edit

Chain rules for nonsmooth functions are very important in mathematics and mathematical physics since there are several important physical models whose behaviors are described by functions or functionals with a very limited degree of smoothness. The following chain rule is proved in the paper (Vol'pert 1967, p. 248). Note all partial derivatives must be interpreted in a generalized sense, i.e., as generalized derivatives.

Theorem. Let   be a function of class   (i.e. a continuous and differentiable function having continuous derivatives) and let   be a function in   with   being an open subset of  . Then   and

 

where   is the mean value of the function at the point  , defined as

 

A more general chain rule formula for Lipschitz continuous functions   has been found by Luigi Ambrosio and Gianni Dal Maso and is published in the paper (Ambrosio & Dal Maso 1990). However, even this formula has very important direct consequences: we use   in place of  , where   is also a   function. We have to assume also that   is locally integrable with respect to the measure   for each  , and that   is locally integrable with respect to the measure   for each  . Then choosing  , the preceding formula gives the Leibniz rule for 'BV' functions

 

Generalizations and extensions

edit

Weighted BV functions

edit

It is possible to generalize the above notion of total variation so that different variations are weighted differently. More precisely, let   be any increasing function such that   (the weight function) and let   be a function from the interval    taking values in a normed vector space  . Then the  -variation of   over   is defined as

 

where, as usual, the supremum is taken over all finite partitions of the interval  , i.e. all the finite sets of real numbers   such that

 

The original notion of variation considered above is the special case of  -variation for which the weight function is the identity function: therefore an integrable function   is said to be a weighted BV function (of weight  ) if and only if its  -variation is finite.

 

The space   is a topological vector space with respect to the norm

 

where   denotes the usual supremum norm of  . Weighted BV functions were introduced and studied in full generality by Władysław Orlicz and Julian Musielak in the paper Musielak & Orlicz 1959: Laurence Chisholm Young studied earlier the case   where   is a positive integer.

SBV functions

edit

SBV functions i.e. Special functions of Bounded Variation were introduced by Luigi Ambrosio and Ennio De Giorgi in the paper (Ambrosio & De Giorgi 1988), dealing with free discontinuity variational problems: given an open subset   of  , the space   is a proper linear subspace of  , since the weak gradient of each function belonging to it consists precisely of the sum of an  -dimensional support and an  -dimensional support measure and no intermediate-dimensional terms, as seen in the following definition.

Definition. Given a locally integrable function  , then   if and only if

1. There exist two Borel functions   and   of domain   and codomain   such that

 

2. For all of continuously differentiable vector functions   of compact support contained in  , i.e. for all   the following formula is true:

 

where   is the  -dimensional Hausdorff measure.

Details on the properties of SBV functions can be found in works cited in the bibliography section: particularly the paper (De Giorgi 1992) contains a useful bibliography.

BV sequences

edit

As particular examples of Banach spaces, Dunford & Schwartz (1958, Chapter IV) consider spaces of sequences of bounded variation, in addition to the spaces of functions of bounded variation. The total variation of a sequence x = (xi) of real or complex numbers is defined by

 

The space of all sequences of finite total variation is denoted by BV. The norm on BV is given by

 

With this norm, the space BV is a Banach space which is isomorphic to  .

The total variation itself defines a norm on a certain subspace of BV, denoted by BV0, consisting of sequences x = (xi) for which

 

The norm on BV0 is denoted

 

With respect to this norm BV0 becomes a Banach space as well, which is isomorphic and isometric to   (although not in the natural way).

Measures of bounded variation

edit

A signed (or complex) measure   on a measurable space   is said to be of bounded variation if its total variation   is bounded: see Halmos (1950, p. 123), Kolmogorov & Fomin (1969, p. 346) or the entry "Total variation" for further details.

Examples

edit
 
The function f(x) = sin(1/x) is not of bounded variation on the interval  .

As mentioned in the introduction, two large class of examples of BV functions are monotone functions, and absolutely continuous functions. For a negative example: the function

 

is not of bounded variation on the interval  

 
The function f(x) = x sin(1/x) is not of bounded variation on the interval  .

While it is harder to see, the continuous function

 

is not of bounded variation on the interval   either.

 
The function f(x) = x2 sin(1/x) is of bounded variation on the interval  .

At the same time, the function

 

is of bounded variation on the interval  . However, all three functions are of bounded variation on each interval   with  .

Every monotone, bounded function is of bounded variation. For such a function   on the interval   and any partition   of this interval, it can be seen that

 

from the fact that the sum on the left is telescoping. From this, it follows that for such  ,

 

In particular, the monotone Cantor function is a well-known example of a function of bounded variation that is not absolutely continuous.[8]

The Sobolev space   is a proper subset of  . In fact, for each   in   it is possible to choose a measure   (where   is the Lebesgue measure on  ) such that the equality

 

holds, since it is nothing more than the definition of weak derivative, and hence holds true. One can easily find an example of a BV function which is not  : in dimension one, any step function with a non-trivial jump will do.

Applications

edit

Mathematics

edit

Functions of bounded variation have been studied in connection with the set of discontinuities of functions and differentiability of real functions, and the following results are well-known. If   is a real function of bounded variation on an interval   then

For real functions of several real variables

Physics and engineering

edit

The ability of BV functions to deal with discontinuities has made their use widespread in the applied sciences: solutions of problems in mechanics, physics, chemical kinetics are very often representable by functions of bounded variation. The book (Hudjaev & Vol'pert 1985) details a very ample set of mathematical physics applications of BV functions. Also there is some modern application which deserves a brief description.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Tonelli introduced what is now called after him Tonelli plane variation: for an analysis of this concept and its relations to other generalizations, see the entry "Total variation".
  2. ^ See for example Kolmogorov & Fomin (1969, pp. 374–376).
  3. ^ For a general reference on this topic, see Riesz & Szőkefalvi-Nagy (1990)
  4. ^ In this context, "finite" means that its value is never infinite, i.e. it is a finite measure.
  5. ^ See the entry "Total variation" for further details and more information.
  6. ^ The example is taken from Giaquinta, Modica & Souček (1998, p. 331): see also (Kannan & Krueger 1996, example 9.4.1, p. 237).
  7. ^ The same argument is used by Kolmogorov & Fomin (1969, example 7, pp. 48–49), in order to prove the non separability of the space of bounded sequences, and also Kannan & Krueger (1996, example 9.4.1, p. 237).
  8. ^ "Real analysis - Continuous and bounded variation does not imply absolutely continuous".

References

edit

Research works

edit

Historical references

edit
edit

Theory

edit

Other

edit


This article incorporates material from BV function on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.