Gary S. Lawson is an American lawyer whose focus is in administrative law, constitutional law, legal history, and jurisprudence. He was a law clerk for Judge Antonin Scalia of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia from 1985–86 and clerked for Scalia again during his 1986-87 term on the United States Supreme Court.[2] Lawson is currently a professor at the University of Florida Levin College of Law.[3] His immediate prior position was the Philip S. Beck Professor of Law at Boston University School of Law.[4] And he previously taught at the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.[4] He is the secretary of the board of directors of the Federalist Society.[5] With Steven G. Calabresi, he has argued that the Mueller Probe was "unlawful."[4]
Gary S. Lawson | |
|---|---|
| Born | Gary Steven Lawson[1] October 14, 1958 |
| Education | Claremont McKenna College Yale Law School |
| Occupation | Legal scholar |
| Employer | University of Florida Levin College of Law |
Lawson has been cited a number of times in majority opinions, concurrences and dissents written by the United States Supreme Court.[6][7][8]
Contributions to legal theory
editLawson is a notable scholar of and proponent for the constitutional doctrine of Originalism.[9][10][11]
"On Reading Recipes—And Constitutions"
editIn 1997, Lawson wrote a law journal article on the doctrine of Originalism, "On Reading Recipes—And Constitutions", in which he argued that interpreting old text means trying understand how those words would have been understood at the time they were written and illustrated his point by imagining someone trying to cook fried chicken using a very old recipe, the instructions for which contained vagueness due to the dated nature of the recipe. Lawson suggests that someone in that situation would do some research to attempt to understand what the author of the recipe meant, and that this is the essence of the practice of Originalism.[12][13]
In an episode of 5-4 on Originalism, Peter Shamshiri was critical of Lawson's essay, saying, "Can [Lawson] really not conceptualize the differences between a document that dictates the nature of political relations across a country and a recipe?...There are also degrees to which I think this analogy proves the opposite point: When you have a fried chicken recipe, what's your goal in making it? Is it to replicate the original fried chicken, or is it to make the best fried chicken you can? Both of those are valid goals, but that's a threshold question that you need to answer that this analogy skips right over."[14]
Selected works
edit- Lawson, Gary (1997). "On Reading Recipes -- And Constitutions". Georgetown Law Journal. 1823 (1).
- Lawson, Gary; Calabresi, Steven (2019). "Why Robert Mueller's Appointment As Special Counsel Was Unlawful". Notre Dame Law Review. 95 (1): 87.
Bibliography
edit- Lawson, Gary (2022). The Electoral Count Mess: The Electoral Count Act of 1887 Is Unconstitutional, and Other Fun Facts (Plus a Few Random Academic Speculations) about Counting Electoral Votes. Miami: FIU Law Review.[15]
References
edit- ^ https://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?search_name=Lawson%2C+Gary&collection=journals&base=js
- ^ https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1699&context=faculty_scholarship
- ^ "Gary S. Lawson Joins Florida Law". University of Florida Levin College of Law. Retrieved October 15, 2024.
- ^ a b c "Gary S. Lawson". Boston University School of Law. Retrieved May 10, 2017.
- ^ "Board of Directors". The Federalist Society. Retrieved March 30, 2019.
- ^ Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 95-1478, 924 (U.S. 1997) ("See Lawson & Granger, The "Proper" Scope of Federal Power: A Jurisdictional Interpretation of the Sweeping Clause, 43 Duke L. J. 267, 297-326, 330-333 (1993)")
- ^ Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 13–628 (U.S. 2015) ("See Lawson & Granger, The “Proper” Scope of Federal Power: A Jurisdictional Interpretation of the Sweeping Clause, 43 Duke L. J. 267, 291, 297 (1993)")
- ^ Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC, 590 U.S. 18-1334 (U.S. 2020) ("See Lawson & Sloane, The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico’s Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 Boston College L. Rev. 1123, 1127 (2009) (arguing that if Puerto Rico remains “just another territory subject to Congress’ plenary power under the Territories Clause,” “the United States...is in violation of its international legal obligations vis-à-vis Puerto Rico”)")
- ^ Gary S. Lawson, On Reading Recipes -- And Constitutions, 6 Georgetown Law Journal, 1823 (1997).
- ^ Andrew Koppelman (6 March 2012). "Bad News for Everybody: Lawson and Kopel on Health Care Reform and Originalism". Yale Law Journal. Retrieved 9 November 2023.
- ^ Stephen L. Carter (1992). "Originalism and the Bill of Rights". Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y. Retrieved 9 November 2023.
- ^ Will Baude (12 February 2014). "Reasons for being an originalist". Washington Post. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
- ^ Zachary B. Pohlman (10 January 2023). "Revisiting the Fried Chicken Recipe". Notre Dame Law Review. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
- ^ Rhiannon Hamam, Michael Liroff, Peter Shamshiri (31 May 2022). "Originalism: The Doctrine from Hell" (Podcast). Prologue Projects. Event occurs at 27:28. Retrieved 4 November 2023.
{{cite podcast}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Rachel Alexander (27 September 2023). "In Disbarment Trial of Trump's Attorney John Eastman, Berkeley Constitutional Law Professor John Yoo Contradicts California Bar's Star Witness on the Key Issue". Arizona Sun-Times. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  | This American law–related biographical article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |