The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) is an Internet industry initiative to share proprietary information and technology for automated content moderation.[1][2]
History
editFounded in 2017 by a consortium of companies spearheaded by Facebook (now known as Meta), Google/YouTube, Microsoft and Twitter (now known as X), it was created as an organization in 2019 and its membership has expanded to include 18 companies as of the end of 2021.[3] The GIFCT began as a shared hash database of ISIS-related material but expanded to included a wider array of violent extremist content in the wake of the attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand that was live streamed on Facebook.[4]
Members include Microsoft, Meta Platforms (Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp), YouTube, Twitter, Airbnb, Discord, Dropbox, LinkedIn, Amazon, Mailchimp, Pinterest, JustPaste.it, Tumblr, WordPress.com and Zoom.[5]
GIFCT maintains a database of perceptual hashes of terrorism-related videos and images that is submitted by its members, and which other members can voluntarily use to block the same material on their platforms.[5] The material indexed includes images, videos and will be expanded to include URLs and textual data such as manifestos and other documents.[6]
Global Network on Extremism and Technology
editThe Global Network on Extremism and Technology (GNET) is described as the "academic research arm of GICFT".[7][8] It is a collaboration of several academic research centers, led by the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence at King's College London.[9]
Criticism
editGIFCT has been flagged by civil society activists and scholars as a "content cartel" similar to YouTube's Content ID,[1] and a potential tool for "cross-platform censorship".[2] GIFCT was questioned in a joint letter by human rights groups on removals of evidence of war crimes.[10]
Accusations of misuse
editIn 2022, Facebook, Inc., a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, was subject to a subpoena about GIFCT usage as OnlyFans was alleged to have used GIFCT to harm competitors by getting their content and accounts censored on Instagram.[11] Facebook and OnlyFans have described these allegations as being "without merit".[12]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Evelyn Douek (2020-02-11). "The Rise of Content Cartels". Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Retrieved 2022-08-21.
- ^ a b Llanso, Emma (2020-08-21). "Content Moderation Knowledge Sharing Shouldn't Be A Backdoor To Cross-Platform Censorship". Techdirt. Retrieved 2022-08-21.
- ^ "GIFCT Annual Report 2021" (PDF). GIFCT.org. Global Internet Forum for Counter Terrorism. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ Radsch, Courtney (20 September 2020). "GIFCT: Possibly the Most Important Acronym You've Never Heard Of". Just Security. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ a b "GIFCT Membership". GIFCT. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ Culliford, Elizabeth (2021-07-26). "Facebook and tech giants to target attacker manifestos, far-right militias in database". Reuters. Retrieved 2022-02-23.
- ^ "Research". Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism. Retrieved 2023-01-28.
- ^ GNET Official website
- ^ "Partners". GNET-research.org. Retrieved 2023-01-28.
- ^ "Joint Letter to New Executive Director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism | Human Rights Watch". Human Rights Watch. 2020-07-30. Retrieved 2024-10-09.
- ^ "OnlyFans accused of conspiring to blacklist rivals". BBC News. 2022-02-22. Retrieved 2022-08-22.
- ^ "OnlyFans Allegedly Bribed Meta to Put Adult Stars on Terrorist Watchlist". PAPER. 2022-08-11. Retrieved 2022-10-13.
External links
edit
 | This Internet-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This terrorism-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |