Good cop, bad cop, also informally called the Mutt and Jeff technique,[1] is a psychological tactic used in interrogation and negotiation, in which a team of two people take opposing approaches to the subject.[2] One interrogator adopts a hostile or accusatory demeanor, emphasizing threats of punishment, while the other adopts a more sympathetic demeanor, emphasizing reward, in order to convince the subject to cooperate.[3] It is an instance of the Reid technique.[4]

Technique

edit

The "bad cop" takes an aggressive, negative stance towards the subject, making blatant accusations, derogatory comments, threats, and in general creating antipathy with the subject. This sets the stage for the "good cop" to act sympathetically, appearing supportive and understanding, and in general showing sympathy for the subject. The good cop defends the subject from the bad cop. The subject may feel able to cooperate with the good cop, either out of trust or out of fear of the bad cop and may then seek protection by the good cop and provide the information the interrogators are seeking.[5]

When this technique is used as a negotiation tactic outside of the interrogation context, the good cop attempts to convince the counterpart to cut a deal by implying that the bad cop will return if no agreement is reached.[6] The order can also be reversed. In this scenario, the good cop does most of the talking, while the bad cop intervenes only to apply pressure to elicit compliance from the subject.[6]

The disadvantage of this technique is that it can be easily identified, and the "bad cop" may alienate the subject.[7]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ The Phrase Finder. "Mutt and Jeff"
  2. ^ Susan Brodt; Marla Tuchinsky (March 2000). "Working Together but in Opposition: An Examination of the "Good-Cop/Bad-Cop" Negotiating Team Tactic". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 81 (2): 155–177. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2879. PMID 10706812.
  3. ^ Shonk, Katie (January 7, 2020). "The Good Cop, Bad Cop Negotiation Strategy". Harvard University. Archived from the original on March 18, 2019. Retrieved June 10, 2021.
  4. ^ "Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual" (PDF). Central Intelligence Agency. 1983. pp. 26–27. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 25, 2017. Retrieved June 10, 2021.
  5. ^ Mark Homan (2010). Promoting Community Change: Making it Happen in the Real World. Cengage Learning. p. 389. ISBN 978-0840031952. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
  6. ^ a b Lewicki, Roy J.; Hiam, Alexander (2011). Mastering Business Negotiation: A Working Guide to Making Deals and Resolving Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. 114. ISBN 9781118046944. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
  7. ^ Lewicki, Roy J.; Hiam, Alexander (2011). Mastering Business Negotiation: A Working Guide to Making Deals and Resolving Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. 115. ISBN 9781118046944. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
edit
Listen to this article (2 minutes)
 
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 4 August 2022 (2022-08-04), and does not reflect subsequent edits.