Rioarribasuchus is a genus of aetosaur. Fossils have been found from the Chinle Formation in Arizona and New Mexico that date back to the upper Late Carnian stage of the Late Triassic.
| Rioarribasuchus Temporal range:
| |
|---|---|
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Reptilia |
| Clade: | Archosauria |
| Clade: | Pseudosuchia |
| Order: | †Aetosauria |
| Family: | †Stagonolepididae |
| Genus: | †Rioarribasuchus Lucas, Hunt & Spielmann, 2006 |
| Species: | †R. chamaensis
|
| Binomial name | |
| †Rioarribasuchus chamaensis (Zeigler, Heckert & Lucas, 2003)
| |
| Synonyms | |
| |
History
edit"Desmatosuchus" chamaensis was named in 2003 and found from the Petrified Forest Member of the Chinle Formation in New Mexico.[1][2] It was suggested to be more closely related to Paratypothorax, and so Parker gave it the name Heliocanthus. However, this new generic name was first proposed in an unpublished thesis, and thus did not meet ICZN regulations for the naming of a new taxon.
Later published papers reasserted the genetic separation of "D". chamaensis from Desmatosuchus, but the name Heliocanthus remained a nomen nudum until 2007, where it was thoroughly rediscribed in a paper published by the Journal of Systematic Palaeontology.[3]
However, a paper previously published in late 2006 assigned "D". chamaensis to the new genus Rioarribasuchus.[4] As a result, Heliocanthus is a junior objective synonym of Rioarribasuchus because the genus has seniority over Heliocanthus. However, the name Rioarribasuchus has been viewed as a violation of the code of ethics laid out in Appendix A of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and the papers that made use of the name have even been described as practicing "intellectual theft".[5]
An article published later in 2007 in the science blog Tetrapod Zoology brought these events to the attention of a wider range of readers, and the controversy was dubbed "Aetogate".[6] This sparked continued debate regarding these issues among vertebrate paleontologists, which eventually led to an investigation by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology into these issues and a response given in mid 2008 regarding the unethical conduct of the authors who described Rioarribasuchus.[7]
References
edit- ^ Zeigler, K. A., Heckert, A. B., and Lucas, S. G. (2003). A new species of Desmatosuchus (Archosauria:Aetosauria) from the Upper Triassic of the Chama Basin, north-central New Mexico. In: Heckert, A. B. and Lucas, S. G., eds., Upper Triassic Stratigraphy and Paleontology. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin No. 21
- ^ Parker, W. G. (2003). Description of a new specimen of Desmatosuchus haplocerus from the Late Triassic of Northern Arizona. Unpublished MS thesis. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff. 315 pp.
- ^ Parker, W. G. (2007). Reassessment of the Aetosaur "Desmatosuchus" chamaensis with a reanalysis of the phylogeny of the Aetosauria (Archosauria:Pseudosuchia). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 5:41–68.
- ^ Lucas, S. G., Hunt, A. P., and Spielmann, J. A. (2006). Rioarribasuchus, a new name for an aetosaur from the Upper Triassic of north-central New Mexico. In: Harris et al., eds., The Triassic-Jurassic Terrestrial Transition. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 37.
- ^ "Timeline".
- ^ "Tetrapod Zoology : The armadillodile diaries, a story of science ethics". Archived from the original on 2008-10-17. Retrieved 2009-05-09.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-14. Retrieved 2010-08-16.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
External links
edit
- Tetrapod Zoology article explaining the taxonomic issues regarding Rioarribasuchus
- PDF response given by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology regarding the issues surrounding the naming and use of Rioarribasuchus
- A timeline of publications and letters by Aetogate
 | This article about a prehistoric archosaur is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |