In mathematics, an n-group, or n-dimensional higher group, is a special kind of n-category that generalises the concept of group to higher-dimensional algebra. Here, may be any natural number or infinity. The thesis of Alexander Grothendieck's student Hoàng Xuân Sính was an in-depth study of 2-groups under the moniker 'gr-category'.
The general definition of -group is a matter of ongoing research. However, it is expected that every topological space will have a homotopy -group at every point, which will encapsulate the Postnikov tower of the space up to the homotopy group , or the entire Postnikov tower for .
Examples
editEilenberg-Maclane spaces
editOne of the principal examples of higher groups come from the homotopy types of Eilenberg–MacLane spaces since they are the fundamental building blocks for constructing higher groups, and homotopy types in general. For instance, every group can be turned into an Eilenberg-Maclane space through a simplicial construction,[1] and it behaves functorially. This construction gives an equivalence between groups and 1-groups. Note that some authors write as , and for an abelian group , is written as .
2-groups
editThe definition and many properties of 2-groups are already known. 2-groups can be described using crossed modules and their classifying spaces. Essentially, these are given by a quadruple where are groups with abelian,
a group homomorphism, and a cohomology class. These groups can be encoded as homotopy -types with and , with the action coming from the action of on higher homotopy groups, and coming from the Postnikov tower since there is a fibration
coming from a map . Note that this idea can be used to construct other higher groups with group data having trivial middle groups , where the fibration sequence is now
coming from a map whose homotopy class is an element of .
3-groups
editAnother interesting and accessible class of examples which requires homotopy theoretic methods, not accessible to strict groupoids, comes from looking at homotopy 3-types of groups.[2] Essentially, these are given by a triple of groups with only the first group being non-abelian, and some additional homotopy theoretic data from the Postnikov tower. If we take this 3-group as a homotopy 3-type , the existence of universal covers gives us a homotopy type which fits into a fibration sequence
giving a homotopy type with trivial on which acts on. These can be understood explicitly using the previous model of 2-groups, shifted up by degree (called delooping). Explicitly, fits into a Postnikov tower with associated Serre fibration
giving where the -bundle comes from a map , giving a cohomology class in . Then, can be reconstructed using a homotopy quotient .
n-groups
editThe previous construction gives the general idea of how to consider higher groups in general. For an n-group with groups with the latter bunch being abelian, we can consider the associated homotopy type and first consider the universal cover . Then, this is a space with trivial , making it easier to construct the rest of the homotopy type using the Postnikov tower. Then, the homotopy quotient gives a reconstruction of , showing the data of an -group is a higher group, or simple space, with trivial such that a group acts on it homotopy theoretically. This observation is reflected in the fact that homotopy types are not realized by simplicial groups, but simplicial groupoids[3]pg 295 since the groupoid structure models the homotopy quotient .
Going through the construction of a 4-group is instructive because it gives the general idea for how to construct the groups in general. For simplicity, let's assume is trivial, so the non-trivial groups are . This gives a Postnikov tower
where the first non-trivial map is a fibration with fiber . Again, this is classified by a cohomology class in . Now, to construct from , there is an associated fibration
given by a homotopy class . In principle[4] this cohomology group should be computable using the previous fibration with the Serre spectral sequence with the correct coefficients, namely . Doing this recursively, say for a -group, would require several spectral sequence computations, at worst many spectral sequence computations for an -group.
n-groups from sheaf cohomology
editFor a complex manifold with universal cover , and a sheaf of abelian groups on , for every there exists[5] canonical homomorphisms
giving a technique for relating n-groups constructed from a complex manifold and sheaf cohomology on . This is particularly applicable for complex tori.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "On Eilenberg-Maclane Spaces" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 Oct 2020.
- ^ Conduché, Daniel (1984-12-01). "Modules croisés généralisés de longueur 2". Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 34 (2): 155–178. doi:10.1016/0022-4049(84)90034-3. ISSN 0022-4049.
- ^ Goerss, Paul Gregory. (2009). Simplicial homotopy theory. Jardine, J. F., 1951-. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag. ISBN 978-3-0346-0189-4. OCLC 534951159.
- ^ "Integral cohomology of finite Postnikov towers" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 Aug 2020.
- ^ Birkenhake, Christina (2004). Complex Abelian Varieties. Herbert Lange (Second, augmented ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 573–574. ISBN 978-3-662-06307-1. OCLC 851380558.
- Hoàng Xuân Sính, Gr-catégories, PhD thesis, (1973)
- "Thesis of Hoàng Xuân Sính (Gr-catégories)". Archived from the original on 2022-08-27.
- Baez, John C.; Lauda, Aaron D. (2003). "Higher-Dimensional Algebra V: 2-Groups". arXiv:math/0307200v3.
- Roberts, David Michael; Schreiber, Urs (2008). "The inner automorphism 3-group of a strict 2-group". Journal of Homotopy and Related Structures. 3: 193–244. arXiv:0708.1741.
- "Classification of weak 3-groups". MathOverflow.
- Jardine, J. F. (January 2001). "Stacks and the homotopy theory of simplicial sheaves". Homology, Homotopy and Applications. 3 (2): 361–384. doi:10.4310/HHA.2001.v3.n2.a5. S2CID 123554728.
Algebraic models for homotopy n-types
edit- Blanc, David (1999). "Algebraic invariants for homotopy types". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 127 (3): 497–523. arXiv:math/9812035. Bibcode:1999MPCPS.127..497B. doi:10.1017/S030500419900393X. S2CID 17663055.
- Arvasi, Z.; Ulualan, E. (2006). "On algebraic models for homotopy 3-types" (PDF). Journal of Homotopy and Related Structures. 1: 1–27. arXiv:math/0602180. Bibcode:2006math......2180A.
- Brown, Ronald (1992). "Computing homotopy types using crossed n-cubes of groups". Adams Memorial Symposium on Algebraic Topology. pp. 187–210. arXiv:math/0109091. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526305.014. ISBN 9780521420747. S2CID 2750149.
- Joyal, André; Kock, Joachim (2007). "Weak units and homotopy 3-types". Categories in Algebra, Geometry and Mathematical Physics. Contemporary Mathematics. Vol. 431. pp. 257–276. doi:10.1090/conm/431/08277. ISBN 9780821839706. S2CID 13931985.
- Algebraic models for homotopy n-types at the nLab - musings by Tim porter discussing the pitfalls of modelling homotopy n-types with n-cubes
Cohomology of higher groups
edit- Eilenberg, Samuel; MacLane, Saunders (1946). "Determination of the Second Homology and Cohomology Groups of a Space by Means of Homotopy Invariants". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 32 (11): 277–280. Bibcode:1946PNAS...32..277E. doi:10.1073/pnas.32.11.277. PMC 1078947. PMID 16588731.
- Thomas, Sebastian (2009). "The third cohomology group classifies crossed module extensions". arXiv:0911.2861 [math.KT].
- Thomas, Sebastian (January 2010). "On the second cohomology group of a simplicial group". Homology, Homotopy and Applications. 12 (2): 167–210. arXiv:0911.2864. doi:10.4310/HHA.2010.v12.n2.a6. S2CID 55449228.
- Noohi, Behrang (2011). "Group cohomology with coefficients in a crossed module". Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu. 10 (2): 359–404. arXiv:0902.0161. doi:10.1017/S1474748010000186. S2CID 7835760.
Cohomology of higher groups over a site
editNote this is (slightly) distinct from the previous section, because it is about taking cohomology over a space with values in a higher group , giving higher cohomology groups . If we are considering as a homotopy type and assuming the homotopy hypothesis, then these are the same cohomology groups.