Archaeology in India is mainly done under the supervision of the Archaeological Survey of India.

The Mahabodhi Temple in Bodhgaya, India, which is the alleged place of enlightenment of the Buddha. It remains one of India's most important archaeological sites.

History

edit

12th century Indian scholar Kalhana's writings involved recording of local traditions, examining manuscripts, inscriptions, coins and architectures, which is described as one of the earliest traces of archaeology. One of his notable work is called Rajatarangini which was completed in c.1150 and is described as one of the first history books of India.[1] [2][3]

Origin of modern archaeology

edit

One of the earliest non-Indian scholars to take an interest in the archaeology of the Indian subcontinent were Western European travelers in the 16th, 17th and early 18th centuries. The earliest European written accounts of India's ancient monuments and Hindu temples were produced by sailors and travelers in the 16th, 17th and early 18th centuries CE. Some of these accounts included ground plans and drawings of the buildings, however they lacked any historical discussion of their origins, with the exception of several references to Alexander the Great, the Macedonian emperor, who tried and failed to conquer India in the fourth century BCE.[4]

Some notable archaeological sites in India include Rakhigarhi, an archaeological site located in the state of Haryana, India. Mohenjo-Daro[5] and Harappa are also ancient archaeological sites that were once a part of India, but now lie within the borders of Pakistan. The Harappan civilization was also called the Indus River Valley Civilization.[6]

Alexander Cunningham and Archaeological Survey of India

edit

"Archaeology in South Asia did not crystallize out of the informal archaeology of enthusiastic amateur South Asians, but was created by elite foreigners, at the capital, by an act of state."

Thomas R. Trautmann and Carla M. Sinopoli, 2002.[7]

Scholarly investigation into Indian archaeology was largely influenced by Alexander Cunningham, who became the first director of the Archaeological Survey of India, which was established in 1861. Cunningham along with various assistants visited many sites and monuments of archaeological importance in India. Their trips ranged from simply visiting sites to study and report on to excavations as well.[8]

 
This is an image of the Rahigarhi/Rakhigarhi site in Harayana, India

Paleolithic archaeological sites (2,500,000–250,000 BC)

edit

Palaeolithic sites in India are characterised by the Madrasian culture and Soanian culture. Bhimbetka rock shelters is also a paleolithic (Old Stone Age) and mesolithic (Middle Stone Age) site.

Mesolithic sites (250,000 BC–10,000 BC)

edit

Anangpur caves (Faridabad) and Mangar Bani Caves (Gurugram) in Delhi NCR, Bhimbetka rock shelters (Bhopal) and Pahargarh caves (Morena) IN Madhya Pradesh have continuity of paleolithic to mesolithic phase.

Neolithic sites (10,800–3300 BC)

edit

Neolithic sites in India are characterised by the Bhirrana culture (7570–6200 BC), Mehrgarh culture (7000–3300 BC) and Edakkal culture (5000–3000 BC).

Marine archaeology in the Gulf of Khambat,

Sanganakallu, Kupgal petroglyphs, Sonda rock art, dwellings of Anegundi are neolithic sites. Brahmagiri archaeological site has neolithic and mesolithic phases.

Chalcolithic (Copper age) archaeological sites (3500–1500 BC)

edit

Chalcolithic sites in India are characterised by the following cultures.

Megalithic archaeological sites of India

edit

Megaliths in India date back to 5000 BC in southern India, before 3000 BC in upper Indus valley in northern India,[9] and megaliths in eastern India are of much later date.[10][11]

Types of megaliths

edit

Megaliths, made of large stones, are man-made structures.

Based on the "structural design" megaliths are classified as either monolith or polylithic.:[12]

  • Monolithic structures: are single large stones standing vertically, which have following 2 sub-types.
    • Menhir: are vertically standing stone, usually found across all continents.
    • Stone circles: are vertically standing several stones, standing separate from each other with no physical contact with each other, to form circle, semi circle or ellipse.
  • Polylithic structures are made of several large stones in physical contact with each other, these are of following 3 sub-types:
    • Dolmen: megalith which is made in single chamber tomb, usually consisting of three or more upright stones supporting a large flat horizontal capstone.
    • Cairn: a man-made pile of stones, often in conical form, raised either as sepulchral monuments or for astronomical use, these range from simple small piles of loose stones to architecturally complex arrangements.
    • Cist: encasements for dead bodies, in which presence of ornaments shows the wealth or importance of the dead, usually found in groups or close to cairns.

Based on the "usage type" megaliths are classified as

  • Non-sepulchral: not-used for burial, but have ceremonial usage such as worship.
  • Sepulchral: used for burial. Many of these sites are associated with burial or post burial rituals which may have been connected with ancestor worship, including memorials for those whose remains may or may not be available.[10][13][14] There is another distinct class of megaliths that are not associated with burials.[10]

List of megalithic sites in India

edit

In India, megaliths of all kinds are noted; these vary from chamber tomb, stone alignment and anthropomorphic figures as well as the following:[10]

Megalithic monuments by states

edit

Megaliths are found across whole of India, but there are found in higher numbers in central, southern and eastern India.

Man-made megalithic monuments in India include Anegundi, Byse rock art, Chovvanur burial cave, Hirapur dolmen, Hire Benakal, Kudakkallu Parambu, Sidlaphadi.

Maharashtra
edit

In Maharashtra, megaliths are found in Vidharba and south Maharashtra. The megaliths found in south Maharashtra are of varied types, such as head stones alone, or rock chambers and even dolmen. Megaliths in Vidarbha regions are burial sites marked by stone circles.[15] Important megalithic sites of Vidarbha are Hirapur dolmens, Stone circles of Junapani sepulchral megaliths of basalt rocks with remains of the dead 10 km (6.2 mi) northwest of Nagpur, Mahurjhari Stone Circles with are 200 megalithic stone circles 15 km (9.3 mi) northwest of Nagpur, Naikund with evidence of iron smelting 35 km (22 mi) north of Nagpur, and Takalghat Khapa 34 km (21 mi) south of Nagpur.[15] In Vidharba, the Naikund, Mahurjhari, Borgaon 40 km (25 mi) southwest of Nagpur and Khairwada 80 km (50 mi) west of Nagpur megalithic sites have been excavated.[16]

Gorewada Stone Circles in Nagpur, connected to both Junapani and Mahurzari civilisation, are India's largest stone circle and it has the highest number of circular stones in India. Kherwadi in Wardha district has 1500 cairns burials, which are connected to Gorewada burial ground.

Pottery found at these sites belongs to Black and red ware (BRW) (10,800–3300 BC).[12] In the Western Ganges plain (western Uttar Pradesh) it is dated to c. 1450–1200 BCE, and is succeeded by the Painted Grey Ware culture; whereas in the Central and Eastern Ganges plain (eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Bengal) and Central India (Madhya Pradesh) the BRW appears during the same period but continues for longer, until c. 700–500 BCE, when it is succeeded by the Northern Black Polished Ware culture.[17]

Bronze Age archaeological sites (3300–1300 BC)

edit

Bronze Age India in the Indian subcontinent begins around 3000 BCE, and it was succeeded by the Iron Age in India beginning in around 1400 BCE. Bronze Age sites include Hire Benakal.

Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC)

edit

In the prehistory of the Indian subcontinent, the Iron Age in India cultures are the Painted Grey Ware culture (1300 to 300 BCE)[18][19] and the Northern Black Polished Ware (700 to 200 BCE), the later corresponds to the transition of the Vedic period Janapada principalities to the sixteen Mahajanapadas region-states of the early historic period, culminating in the emergence of the Maurya Empire towards the end of the period.

Phases of IVC

edit

Phases of IVC

IVC burial sites

edit

More than 50 IVC burial sites have been found, among those main sites in India are Rakhigarhi (first site with genetic testing) and Farmana in Haryana, Sanauli in Uttar Pradesh, Kalibangan in Rajasthan, Lothal and Dholavira in Gujarat. Other IVC burial sites outside India have been found in Pakistan in Mehrgarh, Harappa, and Mohenjo-daro.[20]

Main IVC sites

edit
Rakhigarhi
edit

In 1963, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) began excavations at this site, and, though little has been published about the excavations.[21][22] Further excavations were conducted the ASI headed by the archaeologist, Amarendra Nath, between 1997 and 2000.[23][note 1] The more recent excavations have been performed by Vasant Shinde, an archaeologist from the Deccan College.[24]

Analysis and mapping of this site has shown it to be even larger than Mohenjo Daro.[24] Radiocarbon dating was used at this site to analyze soil samples. The results showed that the soil samples were dated back to the millennium of 2000 years BC.[25]

Bronze Age: Vedic Civilisation (2000–1500 BC)

edit

Early Vedic Civilisation, which falls in the Bronze Age, is characterised to the following cultures:

Iron Age archaeological sites (1500–200 BC)

edit

Iron Age north India: Vedic Civilisation (1500–500 BC)

edit

Vedic Civilisation which originated in Bronze Age, evolved through the following stages in the Iron Age:

Iron Age south India

edit

Iron Age sites in south India are Adichanallur in Tamil Nadu, Hallur in Haveri district of Karnataka, Keezhadi excavation site

Early to mid Middle Ages archaeological sites (500 BC – 1,000)

edit

Middle Kingdoms archaeological sites (230 BC – AD 1206)

edit

Following were either largest in area and/or longest reigning or had watershed moment impact:

Late medieval archaeological sites (1206–1526)

edit

The sites related to the following:

Early modern archaeological sites (1526–1858)

edit

Some of the main sites are related to the

Colonial archaeological sites (1510–1961)

edit

The sites are related to the following colonial rulers:

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Amarendra Nath was later found guilty for forging bills during the excavation at Rakhigarhi.

References

edit
  1. ^ Upinder Singh (2009). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century (PB). Pearson Education. p. 13. ISBN 978-93-325-6996-6.
  2. ^ Ucko, P.J. (2005). Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. Taylor & Francis. p. 192. ISBN 978-1-134-84346-6. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  3. ^ Cunliffe, B.W.; Colin Renfrew, B.W.C.; Cunliffe, P.E.A.I.A.O.F.B.; Davies, W.; Renfrew, C.; Davies, P.H.P.P.U.C.L.F.W.; British Academy; Renfrew, D.P.A.C.U.F.C.; Davies, P.P.E.A.P.H.W. (2002). Archaeology: The Widening Debate. British Academy centenary monographs. British Academy. p. 309. ISBN 978-0-19-726255-9.
  4. ^ Chakrabarti, Dilip K. (1982). "The Development of Archaeology in the Indian Subcontinent". World Archaeology. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 326–344.
  5. ^ "Mohenjo-daro | archaeological site, Pakistan". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  6. ^ "Harappa | Pakistan". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  7. ^ Trautmann and Sinopoli 2002. p. 516.
  8. ^ Ghosh, A. (9 May 1964). "Expedition Magazine - Penn Museum". www.penn.museum. Retrieved 12 July 2020.
  9. ^ P, Pavan (24 October 2016). "Megalith from 5000 BC found in Telangana". The Times of India.
  10. ^ a b c d Mayank N. Vahia; Srikumar M. Menon; Riza Abbas; Nisha Yadav. "Megaliths in Ancient India and their possible association to astronomy" (PDF). Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
  11. ^ Anuja, Geetali (2002). "Living Megalithic practices amongst the Madia gonds of Bhamragad, District Gadchiroli, Maharashtra". Purātattva. 32 (1): 244. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
  12. ^ a b MEGALITHIC CULTURE, accessed 10 July 2021.
  13. ^ Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India. New Delhi: Pearson Education. p. 252. ISBN 978-81-317-1120-0.
  14. ^ Rao, K.P. "Megalithic Anthropomorphic Statues: Meaning and Significance". ResearchWorks Journal Hosting.
  15. ^ a b Sati may have existed among megalithic people, DNA India, accessed 10 July 2021.
  16. ^ Oishi Roy, 2019, Man and Environment, Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quatemary Studies, vol XLIV, pp. 12-20.
  17. ^ Franklin Southworth, Linguistic Archaeology of South Asia (Routledge, 2005), p. 177
  18. ^ Uesugi, Akinori, (2018). "An Overview on the Iron Age in South Asia", in (ed.) Akinori Uesugi, Iron Age in South Asia, Kansai University, Fig. 6, pp. 9-12.
  19. ^ The archaeological term "Iron Age" began to be commonly applied to Indian prehistory in the 1960s (N. R. Banerjee, The Iron Age in India, 1965). Note that the use of "Iron Age" for the Kali Yuga is earlier but unrelated, referencing references the mythological "Ages of Man" of Hesiod.
  20. ^ Astha Dibyopama, Yong Jun Kim, Chang Seok Oh, Dong Hoon Shin, Vasant Shinde, 2015,[1], Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1-9.
  21. ^ Wright, Rita P. (2009), The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society, Cambridge University Press, p. 107, ISBN 978-0-521-57219-4 Quote: "Rakhigarhi will be discussed briefly in view of the limited published material" (p 107)
  22. ^ Sinopoli, Carla M. (2015), "Ancient South Asian cities in their regions", in Norman Yoffee (ed.), The Cambridge World History, Cambridge University Press, p. 325, ISBN 978-0-521-19008-4 Quote: "Excavations have also occurred at Rakhigarhi, but only brief notes have been published, and little information is currently available on its form and organization. (page 325)"
  23. ^ Nath, Amarendra (31 December 2014). "Excavations at Rakhigarhi [1997-98 to 1999-2000]" (PDF). Archaeological Survey of India. p. 306. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 March 2015. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  24. ^ a b Shinde, Vasant; Green, Adam; Parmar, Narender; Sable, P. D. (2012–2013). "Rakhigarhi and the Harappan Civilization: Recent Work and New Challenges". Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute. 72/73: 48. JSTOR 43610687.
  25. ^ Vahia, Mayank N., Pankaj Kumar, Abhijeet Bhogale, D. C. Kothari, Sundeep Chopra, Vasant Shinde, Nilesh Jadhav, and Ranvir Shastri. "Radiocarbon Dating of Charcoal Samples from Rakhigarhi, Haryana, India Using Accelerator Mass Spectrometer." Current Science 111, no. 1 (2016): 27-28. Accessed August 2, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24910004.

Further reading

edit
  • D.P. Agrawal. The Archaeology of India. London : Curzon Press, 1981.
  • Chakrabarti, Dilip K. (1982). "The Development of Archaeology in the Indian Subcontinent". World Archaeology. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 326–344.
  • Chakrabarti D.K. 2009. India, an archaeological history : palaeolithic beginnings to early historic foundations
  • Chakrabarti D.K. 2003. Archaeology in the Third World by Dilip Kumar Chakrabarti
  • Chakrabarti D.K. 1988 A history of Indian archeology from the beginning to 1947
  • Chakrabarti D.K. 2006. The Oxford companion to Indian archaeology : the archaeological foundations of ancient India, Stone Age to AD 13th century
  • Braj Basi Lal (2011). Piecing Together - Memoirs of an Archaeologist. Aryan Books International. ISBN 978-81-7305-417-4.
  • Aryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale Fussman, G.; Kellens, J.; Francfort, H.-P.; Tremblay, X.. (2005) Institut Civilisation Indienne ISBN 2-86803-072-6
  • Dimensions in Indian History and Archaeology (S. P. Gupta and K. S. Ramachandran, eds.) New Delhi: Indian History and lture Society, 1993.
  • Rao, S. R. (2008). Reminiscences of an archaeologist. New Delhi: Aryan Books International.
  • New Trends in Indian Art and Archaeology: S.R. Rao's 70th Birthday Felicitation Volumes, edited by B.U. Nayak and N.C. Ghosh, 2 vols. (1992)
  • Marine Archaeology in India, Delhi: Publications Division, ISBN 81-230-0785-X (2001)
  • S.R. Rao, Marine Archaeology in India, Delhi: Publications Division, ISBN 81-230-0785-X (2001)
  • Trautmann, Thomas R.; Sinopoli, Carla M. (2002). "In the Beginning was the Word: Excavating the Relations between History and Archaeology in South Asia". Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. Vol. 45, no. 4. pp. 492–523.