Critical success factor (CSF) is a management term for an element necessary for an organization or project to achieve its mission. To achieve their goals they need to be aware of each key success factor (KSF) and the variations between the keys and the different roles key result area (KRA).[1]
A CSF is a critical factor or activity that is required for ensuring the success of a company or an organization. The term was initially used in the world of data analysis and business analysis. For example, a CSF for a successful Information Technology project is user involvement.[2]
Critical success factors should not be confused with success criteria. The latter are outcomes of a project or achievements of an organization necessary to consider the project a success or the organization successful. Success criteria are defined with the objectives and may be quantified by key performance indicators (KPIs).
Concept history
editThe concept of "success factors" was developed by D. Ronald Daniel of McKinsey & Company, who published an article entitled "Management Information Crisis" in the Harvard Business Review in 1961.[3] The process was refined into critical success factors by John F. Rockart between 1979 [4] and 1981.[5] In 1995, James A. Johnson and Michael Friesen applied it to many sector settings, including healthcare.[6]
Relation to Key Success Area and Key Success Factors
editThe Critical Success Factor is basically the main system to achieve successes in a company, but to make that possible is necessary to put together the Key Success Factor that needs to be personalized depending on the department, each role has their own Key Success Area. These systems try to achieve success for the company based in standards and rules that need to be followed step by step to guarantee a better service for the clients or partners.
Key Result Area (KRAs)
editKey result areas or KRAs refer to the rules for a specific role in a company. The terms highlight the scope of the job profile for the employee, enabling them to have a better view of their possible role in the company. Which KRA will defer from each other depending on the department.
The Key Result Area is a specific role which each department needs to follow to deliver the goods or services in perfect condition to the final customer or to another department which will have different KSFs. It affects overall performance of the organisation and initiative of all employees towards change management thoughts which lead to their personnel as well as technical knowledge.
Key Success Factors (KSFs)
editIn project management, multiple cross-cultural studies spread over decades have shown that the basic Key Success Factors can be summarized as follows:[7]
| Dominant strategy | |
|---|---|
| Plan | |
| Clear definition of the project chart, goals, roles, and impacts | Clarity (transparency) |
| Access to financial resources | Efficacy |
| Set norms of quality | Efficacy |
| Realistic calendar of tasks and activities | Efficacy |
| Balanced budget | Efficacy |
| Processes | |
| Formal work methodology | Efficiency |
| Solid infrastructures | Efficiency |
| People | |
| Team work | Collaboration |
| Competencies | Competencies (Trust) |
| Commitment | Commitment |
| Power | |
| Experienced managers | Control and transparency |
| Sense of fairness | Fairness |
| Contingency strategy | |
| Risk and vulnerability assessments | Efficacy and efficiency |
Steps to achieve the Key Success Factors
editThis section has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
‹The template Manual is being considered for merging.›
|
The company needs to be aware that it is essential to pull together the team that will be working with the CSFs, its necessary to have employees submit their ideas or give feedback. Never forget to have multiple frameworks to examine the key elements of your long-term goals. Before implementing your company-wide strategic plan with your critical success factors in mind, determine which factors are key in achieving your long-term organizational plan.
Skills
editThe leader needs to be trained and prepared to put the company in the line of success. Some of the skills that can be learned are financial management, marketing sales, and customer service, communication and negotiation, project management and planning, leadership, problem-solving and, lastly, but one of the most important skills, networking.
Communication
editThe company needs to put together all the staffs, all of the giving opinions about what could be better to achieve their goal. The company needs to pay attention in two parts of the communication process: the Initial Launch Communications, which will set the plan to be achieved and the Ongoing Communications, which will be the part where the KSF progress (Contact us is a way to know if the KSF is working well).
Planning
editTo use the CSFs everything needs to be planned, how employees will do it and why. Tools can be used to make planning work faster and easier. A strategy for each department can be planned separately.
Team Work
editA good teamwork is the key to success, when all the staff collaborate more ideas and opinions can be discussed to find the best way to achieve success.
Process
editA business process or business method is a collection of related, structured activities or tasks by people or equipment which in a specific sequence produce a service or product (serves a particular business goal) for a particular customer or customers. Business processes occur at all organizational levels and may or may not be visible to the customers. A business process may often be visualized (modeled) as a flowchart of a sequence of activities with interleaving decision points or as a process matrix of a sequence of activities with relevance rules based on data in the process. The benefits of using business processes include improved customer satisfaction and improved agility for reacting to rapid market change.
Examples
edit- The UK Government's Balanced Scorecard, used for major construction, infrastructure and capital investment procurement projects, seeks to ensure that procuring agencies address several important policy themes in a "balanced" manner, such as solution quality, cost, social and environmental benefits, and supply chain factors, when scoping their projects and evaluating supplier proposals. Each of the themes is accompanied by a series of CSFs. The "supply chain" theme has three CSFs, which illustrate how CSFs can be used: how widely the supply chain can access the opportunity to supply, how the supply chain is managed, and how supplier organisations can develop, learn and improve. Potential metrics for effective supply chain management include the number of defaults attributable to supply chain factors, the number of supply chain disputes, and the percentage of sub-contractor invoices paid late.[8][9]
- In Chinese infrastructure projects, equitable and appropriate risk allocation between public and private commercial partners has been identified as one of the CSFs used on various projects.[10]
See also
editFurther reading
edit- David Parmenter, Key Performance Indicators. John Wiley & Sons 2007, ISBN 0-470-09588-1.
- Klaus G. Grunert and Charlotte Ellegaard. The Concept of Key Success Factors: Theory and Method, 1992, ISSN 0907-2101.
- Michael Amberg. Background of Critical Success Factor Research, 2005
References
edit- ^ "Critical success factors (CSF)". www.businessdictionary.com. BusinessDictionary. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
- ^ Rockart, John F., "Chief executives define their own data needs", Harvard Business Review 1979 (2), pages 81-93.
- ^ Daniel, D. Ronald, "Management Information Crisis", Harvard Business Review, Sept.–Oct., 1961
- ^ Rockart, John F., Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs, Harvard Business Review, March 1979, accessed 24 November 2022
- ^ Rockart, John F. "A Primer on Critical Success Factors" published in The Rise of Managerial Computing: The Best of the Center for Information Systems Research, edited with Christine V. Bullen. (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin), 1981, OR, McGraw-Hill School Education Group (1986)
- ^ Johnson, James A. and Michael Friesen (1995). The Success Paradigm: Creating Organizational Effectiveness Through Quality and Strategy. New York: Quorum Books. ISBN 978-0-89930-836-4.
- ^ Mesly, Olivier (2017). Project feasibility – Tools for uncovering points of vulnerability, New York, NY:Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 546 pages, ISBN 9 781498 757911.
- ^ Crown Commercial Service, Procurement Policy Note – Procuring Growth Balanced Scorecard: Action Note PPN 09/16, published on 14 October 2016, accessed on 18 June 2024
- ^ Crown Commercial Service, Procuring Growth: Balanced Scorecard, published on 14 October 2016, accessed on 18 June 2024
- ^ Chan, A. P. C. et al., Critical Success Factors for PPS in Infrastructure Developments: Chinese Perspectives, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, volume 136, issue 5, May 2010, pp. 484-492, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000152, accessed on 18 June 2024