Wikipedia

Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe

(Redirected from Le Déjeuner sur l'Herbe)
For other uses, see Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe (disambiguation).

Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe (French: [lə deʒœne syʁ lɛʁb, -ʒøn-]; The Luncheon on the Grass) – originally titled Le Bain (The Bath) – is a large oil on canvas painting by Édouard Manet created in 1862 and 1863.

Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe
English: The Luncheon on the Grass
ArtistÉdouard Manet
Year1863
MediumOil on canvas
Dimensions208 cm × 264.5 cm (81.9 in × 104.1 in)
LocationMusée d'Orsay, Paris

It depicts a female nude and a scantily dressed female bather on a picnic with two fully dressed men in a rural setting. Rejected by the Salon jury of 1863, Manet seized the opportunity to exhibit this and two other paintings in the 1863 Salon des Refusés,[1] where the painting sparked public notoriety and controversy.[2] The work increased Manet's fame; in spite of this it nonetheless failed to sell at its debut.[3]

Édouard Manet – Déjeuner sur l'herbe (earlier version at the Courtauld)

The work is now in the Musée d'Orsay in Paris.[4] A smaller, earlier version can be seen at the Courtauld Gallery, London.[5]

Description and context

edit

The painting features a nude woman casually lunching with two fully dressed men. Her body is starkly lit and she stares directly at the viewer. The two men, dressed as young dandies, sit with her. In front of them, the woman's clothes, a basket of fruit, and a round loaf of bread are displayed, as in a still life. In the background, yet too large in comparison with the figures in the foreground, a lightly clad woman bathes in a stream. The man on the right wears a flat hat with a tassel, a kind normally worn indoors.

Despite the mundane subject, Manet deliberately chose a large canvas size, measuring 81.9 × 104.1 in (208 by 264.5 cm), normally reserved for historical, religious and mythological subjects.[6] The style of the painting breaks with the academic traditions of the time. He did not try to hide the brush strokes; the painting even looks unfinished in some parts of the scene. The nude is also starkly different from the smooth, flawless figures of Cabanel or Ingres.

A nude woman casually lunching with fully dressed men was an affront to audiences' sense of propriety, though Émile Zola, a contemporary of Manet's, argued that this was not uncommon in paintings found in the Louvre. Zola also felt that such a reaction came from viewing art differently from the perspective of "analytic" painters like Manet, who use a painting's subject as a pretext to paint.[citation needed]

There is much not known about the painting, such as when Manet actually began painting it, how he got the idea and how and what sort of preparatory works he did.[6] Though Manet had claimed this piece was once valued at 25,000 Francs in 1871, it remained in his possession until 1878 when Jean-Baptiste Faure, opera-singer and collector, bought it for just 2,600 Francs.[6]

Figures in the painting

edit

The figures of this painting are a testament to how deeply connected Manet was to Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe. Some[who?] assume that the landscape of the painting is meant to be l'Île Saint-Ouen, which was just up the Seine from his family property in Gennevilliers. Manet often used real models and people he knew as reference during his creation process.[7] The female nude is thought to be Victorine Meurent, the woman who became his favorite and frequently portrayed model, who later was the subject of Olympia. The male figure on the right was based on a combination of his two brothers, Eugène and Gustave Manet. The other man is based on his brother-in-law, Dutch sculptor Ferdinand Leenhoff. Nancy Locke referred to this scene as Manet's family portrait.[6]

Interactions of the figures

edit

What many critics find shocking about this painting is the interaction, or lack thereof, between the three main subjects in the foreground and the woman bathing in the background. There are many contrasting qualities to the painting that juxtapose and distance the female nude from the other two male subjects. For example, the feminine versus the masculine, the naked versus the clothed, and the white color palette versus the dark color palette creates a clear social difference between the men and the woman.[7] Additionally, some viewers are intrigued by the questions raised by the gaze of the nude woman. It is indeterminable whether she is challenging or accepting the viewer, looking past the viewer, engaging the viewer, or even looking at the viewer at all. This encounter identifies the gaze as a figure of the painting itself, as well as the figure object of the woman's gaze.[7]

Inspirations

edit

As with the later Olympia (1863) and other works, Manet's composition reveals his study of the old masters, as the disposition of the main figures is derived from Marcantonio Raimondi's engraving The Judgment of Paris (c. 1515) after a drawing by Raphael.[8] Raphael was an artist revered by the conservative members of the Académie des Beaux-Arts and his paintings were part of the teaching programme at the École des Beaux-Arts, where copies of fifty-two images from his most celebrated frescoes were permanently on display. Le Bain (an early title for Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe) was therefore, in many ways, a defiant painting. Manet was cheekily reworking Raphael, turning a mythological scene from one of the most celebrated engravings of the Renaissance into a tableau of somewhat vulgar Parisian holidaymakers.[9]

Scholars also cite two works as important precedents for Manet's painting Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe: The Pastoral Concert by Giorgione or possibly Titian (in the Louvre) and Giorgione's The Tempest, both of which are famous Renaissance paintings.[6] The Tempest, which also features a fully dressed man and a nude woman in a rural setting, offers an important precedent for Manet's painting Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe.[10] Pastoral Concert even more closely resembles Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe, as it features two dressed men seated in a rural setting, with two undressed women. Pastoral Concert is in the collection of the Louvre in Paris and is likely, therefore, to have been studied by Manet.

According to Antonin Proust, he and Manet had been lounging by the Seine as they spotted a woman bathing in the river. This prompted Manet to say, "I copied Giorgione's women, the women with musicians. It's black that painting. The ground has come through. I want to redo it and do it with a transparent atmosphere with people like those we see over there."[11]

There may be a connection between Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe and the work of Antoine Watteau.[12] Manet's original title, Le Bain, initially drew the main attention to the woman near the water. This bathing figure alone is quite similar to the figure in Watteau's La Villageoise, as both women crouch or lean over near water, simultaneously holding up their skirts. It is possible that Manet adapted this pose, which is more clearly seen in a sketch of his, years before his creation of Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe.[12]

Criticism

edit

There were many mixed reviews and responses to Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe when it was first displayed[13] and it continues to yield a variety of responses. The initial response was characterized by its blunt rejection from the Paris Salon and subsequent display in the Salon des Refusés. Though many critiques were rooted in confusion about the piece, they were not always completely negative.[14]

  • Odilon Redon, for example, did not like it. There is a discussion of it, from this point of view, in Proust's Remembrance of Things Past.
  • Le Capitaine Pompilius, a contributor for Le Petit Journal, thought the characteristically "male" colors of the piece brought the countryside into the salon, but thought the painting was underdeveloped.[14]
  • Castagnary, appreciator of realist works, identified it as a nice sketch but said it lacked sincerity and lost the definition of the anatomy of the subjects. He also described Manet's painting technique as "flabby".[14]
  • Arthur Stevens, contributor for Le Figaro, praised Manet as a talented colorist but felt that he neglected form and modeling in this piece.[14]
  • Thoré, Paul, and Louvet loved the energy of the colors but found the brush strokes to be uneven.[14]

One interpretation of the work is that it depicts the rampant prostitution present at that time in the Bois de Boulogne, a large park on the western outskirts of Paris. This prostitution was common knowledge in Paris, but was considered a taboo subject unsuitable for a painting.[15]

Criticism of the subject matter

edit
  • Louis Étienne characterized the painting as a puzzle, while describing the nude female as "a Bréda of some sort, as nude as possible, lolling boldly between two swells dressed to the teeth. These two persons look like high school students on holiday, committing a great sin to prove their manhood."[16][14]
  • Arthur Stevens could not understand what the painting was saying.[14]
  • Didier de Montchaux found the subject to be "fairly scabrous".[14]
  • Thoré described the nude as an ugly and risqué subject matter, while describing the male on the right as one "who doesn't even think of taking off his horrible padded hat outdoors ... It's the contrast between such an antipathetic animal to the character of a pastoral scene, and this undraped bather, that is shocking."[14]
  • Philip Hamerton, an English painter and contributor at the Fine Arts Quarterly, had an affinity for the characteristic photographic detail of the Pre-Raphaelite paintings. Though he did recognize the inspiration from Giorgione, he found Manet's modern realism to be offensive in this situation. His disapproval of Manet and similar artists was related to the idea of indecency behind "vulgar men" painting nude women.[14]

Though the peculiarity of the combination of one female nude with three clothed figures sparked mixed responses, the lack of interaction of the figures in addition to the lack of engagement by the nude woman provoked laughter instead of offense. Anne McCauley claimed that laughter as a response represses the sexual tension and makes the scene rather unthreatening to the viewer in the end.[14]

Commentary of Émile Zola

edit

The Luncheon on the Grass is the greatest work of Édouard Manet, one in which he realizes the dream of all painters: to place figures of natural grandeur in a landscape. We know the power with which he vanquished this difficulty. There are some leaves, some tree trunks, and, in the background, a river in which a chemise-wearing woman bathes; in the foreground, two young men are seated across from a second woman who has just exited the water and who dries her naked skin in the open air. This nude woman has scandalized the public, who see only her in the canvas. My God! What indecency: a woman without the slightest covering between two clothed men! That has never been seen. And this belief is a gross error, for in the Louvre there are more than fifty paintings in which are found mixes of persons clothed and nude. But no one goes to the Louvre to be scandalized. The crowd has kept itself moreover from judging The Luncheon on the Grass like a veritable work of art should be judged; they see in it only some people who are having a picnic, finishing bathing, and they believed that the artist had placed an obscene intent in the disposition of the subject, while the artist had simply sought to obtain vibrant oppositions and a straightforward audience. Painters, especially Édouard Manet, who is an analytic painter, do not have this preoccupation with the subject which torments the crowd above all; the subject, for them, is merely a pretext to paint, while for the crowd, the subject alone exists. Thus, assuredly, the nude woman of The Luncheon on the Grass is only there to furnish the artist the occasion to paint a bit of flesh. That which must be seen in the painting is not a luncheon on the grass; it is the entire landscape, with its vigors and its finesses, with its foregrounds so large, so solid, and its backgrounds of a light delicateness; it is this firm modeled flesh under great spots of light, these tissues supple and strong, and particularly this delicious silhouette of a woman wearing a chemise who makes, in the background, an adorable dapple of white in the milieu of green leaves. It is, in short, this vast ensemble, full of atmosphere, this corner of nature rendered with a simplicity so just, all of this admirable page in which an artist has placed all the particular and rare elements which are in him.[17][18]

Zola presents a fictionalised version of the painting and the controversy surrounding it in his 1886 novel L'Œuvre (The Masterpiece).[19]

Inspired works

edit
 
James Tissot, La Partie Carrée, 1870
  • In L'Oeuvre, Émile Zola's 1886 novel about a painter, a work by his main character, Claude Lantier, exhibited in a fictional salon des refusés, resembles Manet's painting.
 
Claude Monet, Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe, 1865–1866, Musée d'Orsay, Paris
  • Claude Monet's own version of Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe from 1865–1866, was inspired by Manet's painting.[20] After Monet finished his painting, Manet was conscious of that artwork and renamed his own artwork "Le Bain" to "Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe" in 1867.
  • French painter James Tissot, painted La Partie Carrée, in 1870; arguably a tamer version without the nudity of Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe.
 
Paul Cézanne, Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe, 1876–1877, Musée de l'Orangerie
  • Paul Cézanne painted the same theme in his Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe (1876–1877), Musée de l'Orangerie, Paris. It is not certain, however, that Cézanne was responsible for the title of the work, but it does incorporate many of the same elements of subject in the piece. For example, Cézanne's clothed female subject poses similarly to the model of Manet in which her chin rests in her hand. The male figure, meant to resemble the painter himself, mimics the hand gesture of the man furthest right in Manet's piece.[21] The composition of Cézanne's painting also bears resemblance to Bacchanal (between 1627 and 1628), by Nicolas Poussin, whose works in the Louvre were periodically copied by Cézanne. It is possible that Cézanne's Déjeuner represents nothing more than the joyful memories of outings in the countryside around Aix-en-Provence, known especially from the testimony of a childhood friend of the painter, Émile Zola.[22]
 
Pablo Picasso, Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, 1907, MoMA

References

edit
  1. ^ Catalogue des ouvrages de peinture, sculpture, gravure, lithographie et architecture : refusés par le Jury de 1863 et exposés, par décision de S.M. l'Empereur au salon annexe, palais des Champs-Elysées, le 15 mai 1863, Édouard Manet, Le Bain, no. 363, Bibliothèque nationale de France
  2. ^ Boime, Albert (2007). Art in an Age of Civil Struggle. Los Angeles: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 676. ISBN 978-0-226-06328-7.
  3. ^ King 2006.
  4. ^ "Musée d'Orsay, Luncheon on the Grass". Archived from the original on 24 April 2017. Retrieved 6 October 2014.
  5. ^ "Study for Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe". The Courtauld Gallery Collection Online.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Tucker, Paul Hayes, ed. (1998). Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 5–14.
  7. ^ a b c Armstrong, Carol (1998). "To Paint, To Point, To Pose" Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. pp. 93–111.
  8. ^ Ross King. The Judgment of Paris: The Revolutionary Decade that Gave the World Impressionism. New York: Waller & Company, 2006 ISBN 0-8027-1466-8.
  9. ^ Ross King, p. 41.
  10. ^ John Rewald,The History of Impressionism, The Museum of Modern Art, 4th revised edition 1973, (1st 1946, 2nd 1955, 3rd 1961), p. 85. ISBN 0-87070-369-2.
  11. ^ Laessøe, Rolf (2005). "Édouard Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe as a Veiled Allegory of Painting". Artibus et Historiae. 26 (51): 197. doi:10.2307/1483783. JSTOR 1483783.
  12. ^ a b Fried, Michael (1996). Manet's Modernism or, The Face of Painting in the 1860s. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 56–57.
  13. ^ Fernand Desnoyers, La peinture en 1863 : Salon des refusés, A. Dutil (Paris) 1863, Bibliothèque nationale de France (in French)
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k McCauley, Anne (1998). "Sex and the Salon" Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 41–44.
  15. ^ Peter J. Gartner, Art and Architecture: Musée d'Orsay, 2001, p. 180. ISBN 0-7607-2889-5.
  16. ^ Louis Étienne, Le jury et les exposants: salon des refusés, Paris, 1863, p. 30., Bibliothèque nationale de France
  17. ^ Émile Zola, Édouard Manet, 1867, et lps 91
  18. ^ "Émile Zola, Édouard Manet, 1867, link to English translation".
  19. ^ Brombert 1996, pp. 130–131.
  20. ^ Isaacson, Joel (1972). Monet: Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe. New York: Viking Press.
  21. ^ Locke, Nancy (1998). "Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe as a Family Romance" Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 121.
  22. ^ "Paul Cézanne, Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe (1876–1877), Musée de l'Orangerie, Paris". Archived from the original on 29 October 2014.
  23. ^ Picasso: Challenging the past National Gallery exhibition book, p. 116.
  24. ^ "Le Déjeuner sur l'herbre". Cleveland Museum of Art. Retrieved 13 January 2018.
  25. ^ "Les invités sur l'herbe | Braun-Vega | Online Collections | Musée d'Art Moderne de Paris". www.mam.paris.fr. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
  26. ^ CANADAY, John (17 April 1971). "Herman BRAUN". The New York Times.
  27. ^ "1999 New-York exhibition at Nohra Haime Gallery". braunvega.com. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
  28. ^ "Braun-Vega's work in Château Malescasse". open.tube. Archived from the original on 13 July 2021. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
  29. ^ "Decca Records".
  30. ^ "Mickalene Thomas's masterpiece". Art Gallery of Ontario. Retrieved 17 March 2021.

Further reading

edit
  • Brombert, Beth Archer (1996). Édouard Manet: Rebel in a Frock Coat. Little, Brown. ISBN 0316109479.
  • King, Ross (2006). The Judgment of Paris: The Revolutionary Decade that Gave the World Impressionism. New York: Waller & Company. ISBN 0802714668.
edit
External videos
  Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe at Smarthistory
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Le_Déjeuner_sur_l%27herbe&oldid=1255777211"