The Hampson–Linde cycle is a process for the liquefaction of gases, especially for air separation. William Hampson and Carl von Linde independently filed for patents of the cycle in 1895: Hampson on 23 May 1895 and Linde on 5 June 1895.[1][2][3][4]
The Hampson–Linde cycle introduced regenerative cooling, a positive-feedback cooling system.[5] The heat exchanger arrangement permits an absolute temperature difference (e.g. 0.27 °C/atm J–T cooling for air) to go beyond a single stage of cooling and can reach the low temperatures required to liquefy "fixed" gases.
The Hampson–Linde cycle differs from the Siemens cycle only in the expansion step. Whereas the Siemens cycle has the gas do external work to reduce its temperature, the Hampson–Linde cycle relies solely on the Joule–Thomson effect; this has the advantage that the cold side of the cooling apparatus needs no moving parts.[1]
The cycle
edit
The cooling cycle proceeds in several steps:
- The gas is compressed, which adds external energy into the gas, to give it what is needed for running through the cycle. Linde's US patent gives an example with the low side pressure of 25 standard atmospheres (370 psi; 25 bar) and high side pressure of 75 standard atmospheres (1,100 psi; 76 bar).
- The high pressure gas is then cooled by immersing the gas in a cooler environment; the gas loses some of its energy (heat). Linde's patent example gives an example of brine at 10°C.
- The high pressure gas is further cooled with a countercurrent heat exchanger; the cooler gas leaving the last stage cools the gas going to the last stage.
- The gas is further cooled by passing the gas through a Joule–Thomson orifice (expansion valve); the gas is now at the lower pressure.
- The low pressure gas is now at its coolest in the current cycle.
- Some of the gas condenses and becomes output product.
- The low pressure gas is directed back to the countercurrent heat exchanger to cool the warmer, incoming, high-pressure gas.
- After leaving the countercurrent heat exchanger, the gas is warmer than it was at its coldest, but cooler than it started out at step 1.
- The gas is sent back to the compressor, mixed with warm incoming makeup gas (to replace condensed product), and returned to the compressor to make another trip through the cycle (and become still colder).
In each cycle the net cooling is more than the heat added at the beginning of the cycle. As the gas passes more cycles and becomes cooler, reaching lower temperatures at the expansion valve becomes more difficult.
References
edit- ^ a b "Technical information". Kryolab. Lund University. Archived from the original on 14 October 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2013.
- ^ GB 189510165, Hampson, W., "Improvements relating to the progressive refrigerating of gases", issued 1896-03-25
- ^ DE 88824, Linde, Carl, "Verfahren zur Verflüssigung atmosphärischer Luft oder anderer Gase (Method for the liquefaction of atmospheric air or other gases)", issued 1896-09-29
- ^ US 727650, Linde, Carl, "Process of producing low temperatures, the liquefaction of gases, and the separation of the constituents of gaseous mixtures", issued 1903-05-12
- ^ de Waele, A. T. A. M. (2017). "Basics of Joule–Thomson Liquefaction and JT Cooling" (PDF). Journal of Low Temperature Physics. 186 (5–6): 385–403. Bibcode:2017JLTP..186..385D. doi:10.1007/s10909-016-1733-3.
Further reading
edit- Timmerhaus, Klaus D.; Reed, Richard Palmer (2007). Cryogenic Engineering: Fifty Years of Progress. Springer. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-387-46896-9.
- Almqvist, Ebbe (2003). History of industrial gases. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-306-47277-0.
- Maytal, B. -Z. (2006). "Maximizing production rates of the Linde–Hampson machine". Cryogenics. 46 (1): 49–85. Bibcode:2006Cryo...46...49M. doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2005.11.004.