Sir Lyman Poore Duff, GCMG, PC, PC(UK) (7 January 1865 – 26 April 1955) was a Canadian lawyer and judge who served as the eighth Chief Justice of Canada. He was the longest-serving justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.[1]
Sir Lyman Duff | |
|---|---|
 Duff in 1910 | |
| 8th Chief Justice of Canada | |
| In office March 17, 1933 – January 6, 1944 | |
| Nominated by | Richard B. Bennett |
| Appointed by | Earl of Bessborough |
| Preceded by | Francis Anglin |
| Succeeded by | Thibaudeau Rinfret |
| Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada | |
| In office September 27, 1906 – March 17, 1933 | |
| Nominated by | Wilfrid Laurier |
| Appointed by | Earl Grey |
| Preceded by | Robert Sedgewick |
| Succeeded by | Frank Hughes |
| Personal details | |
| Born | Lyman Poore Duff January 7, 1865 Meaford, Canada West |
| Died | April 26, 1955 (aged 90) Ottawa, Ontario |
| Alma mater | University of Toronto Osgoode Hall Law School |
Early life and career
editBorn in Meaford, Canada West (now Ontario) to a Congregationalist minister, Duff received a Bachelor of Arts in mathematics and metaphysics from the University of Toronto in 1887. After graduation, he taught at Barrie Collegiate Institute while studying for the bar.[2] Duff later took courses at Osgoode Hall Law School and was called to the Ontario Bar in 1893.[2]
Duff practised as a lawyer in Fergus, Ontario, after being called to the bar.[2] In 1895, Duff moved to Victoria, British Columbia, and he continued his career there. In 1895, he was appointed Queen's Counsel (Q.C.), which became King's Counsel (K.C.) on 22 January 1901 upon the death of Queen Victoria.[2] In 1903, he took part, as junior counsel for Canada, in the Alaska Boundary arbitration.
In 1923, Mount Duff (Yakutat), also known as Boundary Peak 174, was named after him.[3]
Judicial and other appointments
edit
In 1904, he was appointed a puisne judge of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. In 1906, he was appointed a justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. On January 14, 1919, he was appointed to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom.[4] Duff was the first and only Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada to be appointed to the Imperial Privy Council. In 1924, he was elected as an honorary bencher of Gray's Inn, at the recommendation of Lord Birkenhead.[5]
In 1931, he served as Administrator of the Government of Canada (acting Governor-General of Canada) between the departure of Lord Bessborough for England and the arrival of Lord Tweedsmuir.[2] Duff took on the position, as the Chief Justice was unavailable. As Administrator, Duff opened Parliament and read the Speech from the Throne on 12 March 1931, becoming the first Canadian-born person to do so.[citation needed]
In 1933, Duff was appointed as Chief Justice of Canada, succeeding Chief Justice Anglin. He was made a Knight Grand Cross of the Order of St. Michael and St. George the following year[6] as a result of Prime Minister Richard Bennett's temporary suspension of the Nickle Resolution.[citation needed]
When Governor General Lord Tweedsmuir died in office on February 11, 1940, Chief Justice Duff became the Administrator of the Government for the second time.[2] He held the office for nearly four months, until King George VI appointed Alexander Cambridge, 1st Earl of Athlone as Governor General on June 21, 1940.[2] Duff was the first Canadian to hold the position, even in the interim. A Canadian-born Governor General was not appointed until Vincent Massey in 1952.[citation needed]
Duff also heard more than eighty appeals on the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, mostly Canadian appeals; however, he never heard Privy Council appeals from the Supreme Court of Canada while he served on the latter, otherwise, it would have been seen as a conflict of interest. The last Privy Council appeal heard by Duff was the 1946 Reference Re Persons of Japanese Race.[5]
In 1942, Duff served as the sole member of a Royal Commission constituted to examine the Liberal government's conduct in relation to the defence of Hong Kong. The resulting report, which completely exonerated the government, proved to be controversial, and was seen by many as a whitewash.[citation needed]
Upon reaching the mandatory retirement age for judges in 1939, his term of office was extended by three years by a special Act of Parliament;[7] in 1943, his term of office was extended for another year by Parliament.[8][5] He retired as Chief Justice in 1944.[citation needed]
Impact
edit
Duff employed a conservative form of statutory interpretation. In a 1935 Supreme Court of Canada judgment, he detailed how judges should interpret statutes:
The judicial function in considering and applying statutes is one of interpretation and interpretation alone. The duty of the court in every case is loyally to endeavour to ascertain the intention of the legislature; and to ascertain that intention by reading and interpreting the language which the legislature itself has selected for the purpose of expressing it.[9]
Duff has been called a "master of trenchant and incisive English," who "wrote his opinions in a style which bears comparison with Holmes or Birkenhead."[10] A former assistant of Duff, Kenneth Campbell, argued that Duff was "frequently ranked as the equal of Justices Holmes and Brandeis of the United States Supreme Court".[11] Gerald Le Dain, an academic and later a judge on the Supreme Court, asserted that Duff "is generally considered to have been one of Canada's greatest judges."[12] Other writers have taken a less favourable view, instead arguing that Duff's reputation is largely unearned; his biographer concluded that he was not an original thinker, but essentially a "talented student and exponent of the law rather than a creator of it."[13]
More recent commentary has focused on Duff's legal formalism and its effect on Canadian federalism. A later successor Chief Justice of Canada, Bora Laskin attacked Duff's decisions, arguing that Duff used circular reasoning and hid his policy-laden decisions behind the doctrine of stare decisis.[14] As well, Lionel Schipper noted that, in reviewing Duff's judgments, it was:
apparent that he has given certain factors very little consideration in formulating his decisions. ... In constitutional cases, not only are the actual facts of the case significant but the surrounding social, economic and political facts are equally significant. A shift in these latter factors is as important in deciding a case as any other change in the facts. It is this consideration that Chief Justice Duff ignored.[15]
References
edit- ^ David Ricardo Williams. "Sir Lyman Poore Duff". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f g Campbell, W. Kenneth (October 1974). "The Right Honourable Sir Lyman Poore Duff, P.C., G.C.M.G.: The Man as I Knew Him". Osgoode Hall Law Journal. 12 (2): 243–260. doi:10.60082/2817-5069.2236. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
- ^ "Mount Duff". Geographic Names Information System. United States Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior. Retrieved 2018-05-16.
- ^ Appointment notice at "No. 31427". The London Gazette. 1 July 1919. p. 1.
- ^ a b c "Duff, Sir Lyman Poore (1865–1955), judge in Canada". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/32920. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ Appointment notice at "No. 34010". The London Gazette (Supplement). 29 December 1933. p. 5.
- ^ An Act respecting the Chief Justice of Canada, S.C. 1939 (1st sess.), c. 14
- ^ An Act to amend an Act respecting the Chief Justice of Canada, S.C. 1943-44, c. 1
- ^ The King v. Dubois, 1935 CANLII 1 at 381, [1935] SCR 378 (13 May 1935), Supreme Court (Canada)
- ^ W.H. McConnell (1968). "The Judicial Review of Prime Minister Bennett's 'New Deal". Osgoode Hall Law Journal. 6. Osgoode Hall Law School: 39–86. doi:10.60082/2817-5069.2376. at 51
- ^ Campbell 1974, at 243
- ^ Le Dain 1974, at 261.
- ^ Bushnell, Ian (1992-10-08). Captive Court: A Study of the Supreme Court of Canada. McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP. ISBN 9780773563018.
- ^ Bora Laskin (1947). "'Peace, Order and Good Government' Re-Examined". Canadian Bar Review. 25. Canadian Bar Association: 1054., at 1069-70.
- ^ Schipper 1956, at 11