Mandschurosaurus (meaning "lizard from Manchuria") is an extinct genus of hadrosaurids based on material from the Late Cretaceous of China and possibly also the Early Cretaceous of Laos. It was the first dinosaur genus named from China.
| Mandschurosaurus Temporal range: Late Cretaceous, ~
| |
|---|---|
| |
| Holotype specimen of M. amurensis | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | †Ornithischia |
| Clade: | †Neornithischia |
| Clade: | †Ornithopoda |
| Family: | †Hadrosauridae |
| Genus: | †Mandschurosaurus Riabinin, 1930 |
| Type species | |
| †Mandschurosaurus amurensis Riabinin, 1925
| |
| Species | |
| |
| Synonyms | |
Discovery and naming
editThe holotype of M. amurensis (IVP AS coll.), the only valid species within the genus, is based on a poorly preserved and incomplete skeleton collected by Russian scientists in 1914 from the banks of the Amur River, China in a layer of the Maastrichtian-aged Yuliangze Formation and the remains represent a large hadrosaurid.[1] The holotype material was initially referred to the genus Trachodon (a nomen dubium) as T. amurense by Riabinin (1925),[2] but was later reassigned to a new genus by Riabinin (1930).[1]
The holotype of M. laosensis, which is based mainly on an ilium and other fragmentary remains,[3] comes from the Aptian-Albian-aged Grès supérieurs Formation in Laos and was named by Hoffet (1944).[4] A mounted skeleton based on the holotype of M. amurensis is on display at the Central Geological and Prospecting Museum in St. Petersburg, although much of the skeleton is plaster.
Description
editWhile the holotype of M. amurensis would have measured 8 metres (26 ft) long and 4.5 metres (15 ft) tall, the largest specimen would have measured 11.24 metres (36.9 ft) long and 6.48 metres (21.3 ft) tall and weighed around 1.5-2 metric tons (3,300-4,400 pounds).[5]
It had a broad, flat beak and a long tail, similar to related hadrosaurs.
Classification
editThere has been some debate regarding the validity of this genus. Brett-Surman (1979) first considered it a nomen dubium,[6] though some later workers have continued to see it as a valid taxon (Chapman et Brett Surman, 1990,[7] for example). Most recently, Horner et al. (2004) listed the type species as a nomen dubium in the second edition of The Dinosauria.[8]
Over the years, three species have been placed within this genus: Mandschurosaurus amurensis, M. mongoliensis, and M. laosensis. Brett-Surman (1979) considered M. mongoliensis a distinct genus, which he named Gilmoreosaurus[6] and Horner et al. (2004) considered M. laosensis a nomen dubium;[8] This leaves only Riabinin's original species, M. amurensis, as a possibly valid taxon.
Within Ornithopoda, Mandschurosaurus is most often placed within Hadrosauridae as a nomen dubium.[8][6][7]
Gallery
edit-
Reconstructed M. amurensis skeleton in outdated tripod-pose, VSEGEI Museum, St. Petersburg
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Riabinin A. N. (1930). "Mandschurosaurus amurensis nov. gen, nov. sp. a hadrosaurian dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of the Amur River". Soc. Paleontol. Russ. Mem. 2: 1–36. [Russian]
- ^ Riabinin, A.N. (1925). A mounted skeleton of the gigantic reptile Trachodon amurense, nov. sp. Izvest. Geol. Kom. 44(1):1-12. [Russian]
- ^ Ruiz-Omeñaca, J.I. (2006). Restos directos de dinosaurios (Saurischia, Ornithischia) en el Barremiense (Cretácico Inferior) de la Cordillera Ibérica en Aragón (Teruel, España).
- ^ J.-H. Hoffet. (1944). Description of the most characteristic bones belonging to Avipelvians from the Senonian of Lower Laos. Minutes of the Sessions of the Council for Scientific Research of Indochina 1944:179-186
- ^ Dashan Yang and Zhengyi Wei (1986). "Preliminary note on some hadrosaurs from the Cretaceous of Jiayin County, Heilongjiang Province (Manchuria)" (PDF). Nature Research of Heilongjiang Province. Heilongjiang Provincial Museum: 1–10.
- ^ a b c Brett-Surman M. K. (1979). "Phylogeny and palaeobiogeography of hadrosaurian dinosaurs". Nature. 277 (5697): 560–562. Bibcode:1979Natur.277..560B. doi:10.1038/277560a0. S2CID 4332144.
- ^ a b Chapman R. et Brett-Surman M. K. (1990). Morphometric observations on hadrosaurid ornithopods. in Carpenter K. et Currie, P. J. (eds.), Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 163-177.
- ^ a b c Horner J., Weishampel D. B., et Forster C. A. (2004). Chapter Twenty: Hadrosauridae. in The Dinosauria (2nd edition), Weishampel D. B., Dodson P., and Osmólska H., editors. University of California Press.
