Template talk:Protected page text

(Redirected from MediaWiki talk:Customcssprotected)
Latest comment: 21 days ago by Xaosflux in topic Protected edit request on 24 July 2024

Protected edit request on 12 October 2022

edit

Please implement my changes in the sandbox. The reason for this is that the message MediaWiki:Titleprotected does not show up if the page does not exist anymore (see phab:T312317). This workaround will make sure that an editor visiting a protected page will always know why they cannot create the page. Same information from titleprotected but more, just phrased differently.

I also mention "please save the text temporarily to your device" from the title blacklist forbidden page as pages might be protected suddenly while an editor is working on it. I believe these changes to be non-controversial because it largely replaces functionality for MediaWiki:Titleprotected as that message is not working as it is supposed to. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 17:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Done though this seems to be getting overly complicated. — xaosflux Talk 14:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Fully-protected edit request on 9 November 2023

edit

I would suggest removing the user page link and prefix to show as "This user CSS page/user script is currently protected so that only Protected page text and interface administrators can {{{2}}} it" to maintain consistency with Template:Protected page text/user-json, or remove the unnecessary User: prefix while keeping the userpage link. And please see my request in wikitext so that you do not add Protected page text instead of the user's CSS/JS page. Thanks. 64andtim (talk to me) 15:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 64andtim (talk to me) 15:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done See Template talk:Protected page text/Archive 1#Protected edit request on 7 August 2020 - the current situation is deliberate. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Protected edit request on 9 November 2023

edit

Please implement my changes in the sandbox. This adds a parameter to specify the message for where page protection should be dropped, as well as adds a "title" parameter so a title can be manually specified. Awesome Aasim 17:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

What's the use case for either of these? * Pppery * it has begun... 18:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please see my work in Template:Protected page text/blacklist/sandbox. Here, the parameter would be used to tell users that they can request the title be whitelisted or removed from the blacklist. Awesome Aasim 22:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Done I'm note sure whether I agree reworking the blacklist message in that way is a good idea, but this change by itself is harmless. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Protected edit request on 21 December 2023

edit

Change "Wikipedia:Transclucion" to "Help:Transclusion" in the piped wikilink. Why: Obviously the former is a redirect that is vandalised due to the resulting redirection to the latter title. Toadette (Happy holiday!) 19:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done I just protected the redirect itself. It's only used in one interface page, so that'd be easy to change, but it's in a ton of articles because of template transclusion. It's barely being vandalized; were it a typical page at RFPP, I'd decline, but I think it's justified here. (FWIW, Link to the move discussion) ~ Amory (utc) 23:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Protected edit request on 24 July 2024

edit

Consider adding a check for whether the doc page of a template/module is protected itself. Currently this template always says that they can be edited freely and while that is almost always the case, I was able to find a few protected doc pages in Special:ProtectedPages like Template:Non-free_use_rationale/doc. I've made it so no text appears if the doc page is protected (see TM:Protected page text/sandbox) which I think is acceptable due to how rare this case is, but some text could be added if you disagree. I've also added a check for the other two cases, that is, when both a doc page and a sandbox exist and when only a sandbox exists. The last one should never trigger since sandboxes shouldn't be protected but I think it should be added anyway for consistency. Nickps (talk) 18:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is also another change in the sandbox, done by Awesome Aasim. He made the doc/sandbox message appear for modules as well. Since that is a good change, consider it also a part of this edit request. Nickps (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
... I've unprotected the page of interest. I don't think the change as-is is good enough to implement: I'd expect some text specific to what a person should do be placed in the output. Izno (talk) 22:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Not done needs more development/discussion. — xaosflux Talk 10:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply