MediaWiki talk:Revreview-reject-summary-cur-short
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Redrose64 in topic Protected edit request on 26 February 2014
Protected edit request on 26 February 2014
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the contents of the page with the following:
Reverted $1 pending edits to revision $2 by $3
This doesn't change the appearance or functionality of the message, but it allows several more characters to be used in the custom summary. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I concur with this request, but think that:
Reverted $1 pending edits to revision $2 by $3
[[Help:RV|Reverted]] $1 [[WP:PC|pending]] edit{{PLURAL:$1||s}} by $2 to revision $3 by $4
- will be even more efficient. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 21:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The PLURAL magic word is evaluated before the character limit hits, so it doesn't really matter. By the way, it looks like you copied and pasted from the other request, so that uses the wrong parameters. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Even shorter since this is "short", although I'm not sure why this would be used as opposed to the other or why there are two diff messages. Are you "sure" that the PLURAL is substituted in? If not, it is style taking up bytes in the database entry and being counted. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 21:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure. Also, please fix your copy-and-paste to avoid confusion between the parameters. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The PLURAL magic word is evaluated before the character limit hits, so it doesn't really matter. By the way, it looks like you copied and pasted from the other request, so that uses the wrong parameters. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit protected}}
template. When requesting a change to a MediaWiki page, it's always a good idea to give a link to a discussion where that change was agreed. I suspect that the discussion concerned is Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 124#Difference between revisions pages comment truncation; but I don't see a clear agreement there. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)