Wikipedia

History of Manipur

(Redirected from Medieval Kangleipak)
Not to be confused with history of Manipur (Mahabharata).

The history of Manipur is reflected by archaeological research, mythology and written history. Historically, Manipur was an independent sovereign kingdom ruled by Meitei dynasty but at different point of time it was invaded and rule over by other state and authority.[1][2][3][4] The Kangleipak State developed under King Loiyumba with its first written constitution in the early 12th century.[5] Manipur under the 18th-century king Pamheiba saw the legendary burning of sacred scripture.

Manipur became a princely state under British rule in 1891 after the Anglo-Manipur war, the last of the independent states to be incorporated into British Raj as a princely state.[6] During the Second World War, Manipur was the scene of battles between Japanese and Allied forces. After the war, Maharaja Bodhachandra signed a Treaty of Accession merging the kingdom into India.[7] It was made a union territory in 1956[8] and a full-fledged state in 21 January 1972.[9]

Nomenclature

edit
Further information: Manipur § Alternate names

During the latter part of its history, Manipur and its people were known by different names to their neighbours. The Shans or Pongs called the area Cassay, the Burmese Kathe, and the Assamese Meklee. In the first treaty between the British East India Company and Chingthangkhomba signed in 1762, the kingdom was recorded as Meckley. Bhagyachandra and his successors issued coins engraved with the title of Manipureshwar, or lord of Manipur and the name Meckley was discarded. Later on, the Sanskritisation work, Dharani Samhita (1825–34) popularized the legends of the derivation of Manipur's name.[10]

Prehistoric

edit
Main article: Prehistory of Manipur

Archaeological research in Northeast India is severely scarce, mostly limited to surface explorations, and lacking in state-of-the-art methods.[11]

Human settlement

edit

Few attempts have been made to establish the earliest human settlement in Northeast India, and it is generally thought to have been uninhabited by archaic humans prior to late Pleistocene due to unfavorable geographical conditions.[12] This is however disputed and Northeast Corridors are proposed by some scholars to have played a defining role in early hominid migrations and peopling of India.[13]

Paleolithic

edit
 
Prehistoric stone erections in the "Willong Khullen" village in northern Manipur, which slightly resembles the Stonehenge of England

Most scholars don't discuss a paleolithic age in Manipur (and Northeast).[14] However, Manjil Hazarika, in his 2017 survey of prehistory of Northeast India, rejects that there exists any plausible ground to deny presence of Paleolithic culture in Manipur.[15]

A few paleolithic sites (Khangkhui, Napachik, Machi, Somgu and Singtom) have been located in Manipur.[16] Though, in absence of good chrono-stratigraphic context of the finds and their cohabitation with remains of other ages, accuracy of such identifications remains open to critiques.[14] The existence of Hoabinhian-like complexes remains disputed, as well.[17]

Neolithic

edit

Multiple neolithic sites have been identified in Manipur; they include Nongpok Keithelmanbi, Napachik, Laimenai, Naran Siena, and Phunan.[18] Considered to be part of a larger Southeast Asian complex, the identifications are primarily accorded on the basis of stone tools and pottery (esp. cord-impressed ware); characteristic cultural identifiers of the Neolithic (agriculture, animal rearing etc.) are yet to be located and their development chronology is subject of active research.[19] Hazarika notes the Neolithic culture in Northeast to have begun some four thousand years after that in the Gangetic Plains.[20]

Meiteilon, lingua-franca of Meiteis belongs to the TB phylum.[21] Hazarika notes the Manipuri sites to have an abundance of three-legged pottery and cord-impressed ware, very similar to the ones found in Southern China and Thailand, and hypothesizes that Manipur might have been the melting pot of Neolithic impulses from adjoining regions.[22] Roger Blench, in agreement with George van Driem's reconstructions of archeo-linguistic history of Southeast Asia, proposes that Northeast India accommodated a diverse group of foragers since neolithic age, who learned agriculture and animal rearing c. 4000 B.C before migrating eastwards and establishing the Tibeto-Burman (TB) phylum.[23]

Chalcolithic and beyond

edit

Hazarika notes the broader region to not show evidence of any significant cultural transformation, upon the dawning of Copper Age (and then, Iron Age).[24] The state has an abundance of megaliths of various shapes, serving distinct purposes.[25] Sometime before the Christian era, the valley got inhabited by distinct yeks (clans), who had probably migrated from Southern China during the late Iron Age. The hill-tribes are probably of indigenous origins.[26]

Iron age

edit

There has been a marked absence of historical evidence especially written records governing the span between Iron Age and the first millennium in North East India.[24] Chronicles of other nations mention that trade networks between India proper and South China were likely operating via Manipur; pilgrims are reported to have entered India from China via these territories.[27] The geopolitical history of the region along with the ethno-linguistic background of the inhabitants are largely unknown.[28][29][30]

History

edit
Main article: Kangleipak

Sources

edit
 
A temple dedicated to Vishnu, built in Bishnupur

The primary source concerning ancient and medieval Manipur has been restricted to the Cheitharol Kumbaba (Ch. K.) – the court history of the kings of Manipur – which dates the first king to 33 CE.[28][31] However, the historical record herein up to the reign of King Kyampa (1467–1508 CE) are noted to have been redrafted during the reign of Ching-Thang Khomba (Bhagyachandra) in the mid- to late-18th century because those leaves were "lost". This part of the chronicle remains particularly unreliable. The kings of that period are assigned extraordinary spans of length, and there is a scarcity of objective information.[32] Saroj Nalili Parratt hypothesizes that many of these monarchs were probably borrowed from the cultural pantheon and interspersed with religious myths to fit into their collective memory of intra-clan conquests and legitimize the current rule by the Meitei. Parratt as well as Gangmumei Kamei suspect that the initiation date of 33 CE was arrived upon by the scribes via astrological calculations.[33]

Ch. K. is also a Meitei chronicle – Meitei being one of the migrant clans, originally named Ningthouja, who (at some unknown point of time) assimilated others into a confederacy, and gained rulership of the monarchy – with the early sections being essentially themed on the expansion of the Meitei across the valley of Manipur and other exploits.[34][35]

Some local authors have used Puyas, archaic Manipuri manuscripts in their reconstruction of Manipuri History. This tendency has been criticized by Parratt and others; none of these texts are yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny, and hence are not suitable for purposes other than commenting on Meitei traditions.[36][37][a] Scholars have also found Puyas to have been (potentially) forged by Meitei Nationalists in support of their reinvention of history and tradition.[39][40][41]

Mythology and early kings

edit

Pakhangpa, a primordial dragon god in Meitei mythology, is credited in Ch. K. for having established the Meitei rule by subjugating the "Poireitons". The first seven kings mentioned over Ch. K. – Pakhangpa, Tompok, Taothingmang, Khui Ningngongpa, Pengsipa, Kaokhongpa and Naokhampa – allegedly ruled until 411 CE. Barring Pakhangpa and Taothingmang, the chronicle only records the regnal span of each king. Parratt notes that there's not even any evidence of these seven rulers belonging to the same dynasty, and in all probabilities they were reconstructed from oral legends of varying origins. The chronicle itself mentions that nothing much is known about these "divine"-like kings.

 
A historic dual statue of dragon lion Kanglasha in front of the inner entrance gate to the Kangla Palace of Imphal, which was once the ruling seat of the Meitei kings in old days.

Naokhampa was succeeded by Naophangpa, about whom nothing significant is mentioned in the chronicle. He was succeeded by his son Sameirang, who fought a successful battle over Aangom, a fellow clan. The next ruler was Konthoupa and his reign saw some devastating warfare with "Senloi Langmai". After a monarch-less span of five years, Naothingkhong became the next king. During his reign the chieftain of Pong Kingdom is noted to have engaged in an annexation spree before returning via Manipur. Khongtekcha was the next king; a successful battle over the Moirang clan is noted, and he ruled for ten years. After a gap of eleven years, the next king was Keirencha, who ruled for fifteen years. He was succeeded by Yarepa, who reigned for twenty two years. Nothing else is noted about these two kings. The next four kings were Aayangpa, Ningthoucheng, Chenglei Yipan Lanthapa and Yirengpa, who ruled for a combined total of 253 years. All of them are noted to have emerged victorious in varied kinds of warfare over fellow clans – Aayangpa subdued the Nongyai Khumans, Ningthoucheng raided Houkei, Lanthapa captured a group of Luwangs, and Yirengpa defeated the Moirangs as well as Khumans.[42]

Loiyumpa was the next king, and Ch. K. records his reign in considerable detail. He is credited with the initiation of the first 'constitution'. He was succeeded by Loitongpa, who emerged successful in some undescribed battles on the eastern fronts, probably waged over autochthonous ethnic groups. After a rule of twenty eight years, he was succeeded by Aatom Yoirenpa, who ruled for thirteen years. Yoirenpa was soon chased out by his brother and had to take refuge with the Khumans. Under Yiwanthapa, who reigned for thirty two years, a successful war was waged on the Khumans and their chief queen was murdered. The next ruler was Thawanthapa. In a thirty six year long rule, he subdued multiple internal and external threats. Despite allying with the Khumans once, in a raid against the villagers of Hairem, he would go on to defeat the Khumans. The next king was Chingthang Lanthapa, who defeated the Khumans as well as Kamus, in his eleven year long rule. Thingpai Senhongpa succeeded him; nothing significant is noted except that he ruled for 5 years. Puranthapa, the next king, re-defeated the Khumans at Pairou, consolidated the territories of Koupa Koutai, and conquered the Chakpas.[43]

Khumompa became king in 1263 and went on to ally with the Khumans to successfully ward off an invasion by the rulers of Kabaw Valley. A battle over the mountain-folks of Hao was also waged and their king Maimumpa was captured. Moirampa succeeded him, and again defeated the Khumans as well as Moirangs. Other battles against the Kekes and people of Makihao are noted; Korirong was captured. Thangpi Lanthapa ruled for twenty two years and trounced the Moirangs as well as the Loipi Haos; Tengkongbi and Marem Namngapa were captured. Kongyapa ascended in 1324 went on to succeed him. He was succeeded by Tenheipa, who reigned for twenty years and engaged in a multitude of warfare. Nothing is mentioned about the next ruler Tonapa, except that he reigned for five years. Then, Tapungpa ascended to the throne and waged successful warfare against the Loipi Marems, before being assassinated by Khamlangpa, the king of Chingsong, after thirty five years of rule. Again, there is a scarcity of information about the next king Lairenpa; he reigned for five years and there were no king for five, after. Punsipa's reign went until 1432, and was witness to numerous clashes including one with Moirangs.[44]

One of the early states of the region was the Kangleipak State, its first constitution, the Loiyumba Sinyen, was made during the reign of King Loiyumba in the late 11th century.[5][45][46]

Early Modern

edit
 
The Temple of Shri Govindaji in the "Palace Compound" in Imphal, was the center of Meitei Vaishnavism of the Meitei Hindus in Manipur.

The early modern period is often called "medieval" by Meitei historians.[47]

Ningthoukhompa ruled from 1432 to 1467. He routed out the Moirangs, and repulsed a rebellion by the Tankhnus of the mountains.[48]

During the reign of Meidingu Senbi Kiyamba (1467–1507) the ancient Meitei faith, Sanamahism, began to collapse. It was during his reign that the Brahmin people migrated to the kingdom and the volume of Vaishnavists proceeded with the worship of the Pheiya (sacred stone from Pong kingdom) as the Hindu God Vishnu.[49] This was the origin of Meitei Vaishnavism.

Kuranganayani was a Manipuri princess who became queen of Ahom in 1768.

During the reign of emperor Gharib Niwaz (born Pumbeitha, 1709–1748), the name of the kingdom was changed from Kangleipak to Manipura. It was during his regime the religion of the entire Meitei ethnicity was forcibly converted from Sanamahism into Hinduism.[49][50][51] In 1729, the legendary burning of the sacred scriptures of Sanamahism took place[52] during the reign of Gharib Niwaz. This event is annually commemorated during the Puya Meithaba.

Modern

edit
 
Appearance of the Coat of arms of Manipur in the Flag of Manipur

The history of modern Manipur covers the history of Manipur from the Seven Years Devastation to the Burmese Empire and to the present day.

Seven Years Devastation

edit
Main article: Seven Years Devastation of Manipur

The Burmese invaded Manipur several times but the most notable one was in 1819, during the reign of King Marjit. The Burmese occupied Manipur from 1819 to 1826. During this time, Manipur was devastated and there was chaos and anarchy everywhere. This dark period is called Chahi Taret Khuntakpa (Seven Years Devastation).[53][54]

Manipuri Levy

edit
 
Action by Lieutenant CJW Grant, VC, at Thobal, Manipur, 1 April 1891.

There were exploitations of the Manipuri Levy, which was the first standing army of Manipur, born out of the Manipur National Struggle against the Burmese rule during the Seven Years Devastation.[55][56][57][58]

Anglo-Manipuri War

edit
Main article: Anglo-Manipur War

In the year 1891, the historic Anglo-Manipuri war (Manipur's National Liberation Struggle) took place. The Manipuri soldiers showed their might in the losing battle, sacrificing their lives for the motherland. The combat ended with a British victory.[59][60][61][62]

Japanese bombing

edit
Main article: Battle of Imphal
 
May 1944, a Royal Air Force Hawker Hurricane IIC of No. 42 Squadron RAF based at Kangla, Manipur, piloted by "Chowringhee" Campbell, attacking a bridge near a small Burmese settlement.

Japanese bombing in Imphal took place several times in the history of Manipur, thereby creating high casualties to the people of Manipur. The first bombing was in the year 1942, heralding the beginning of the Second World War in Manipur.[63][64]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Bryce Beemer writes, "Manipur developed a textual tradition on par with that of Upper Burma or Java. The continued existence of clan identities and leadership is one reason for the bewilderingly diverse historical traditions of Manipur. Each clan wrote its own creation myths, religious histories, clan genealogies, and dynastic accounts of noble houses. Although many of these historical texts contradict each other, they represent a rich ore yet to be mined by most Southeast Asianists."[38]

References

edit
  1. ^ Keen, Caroline (2015). An Imperial Crisis in British India. I.B. Tauris. p. 150-152. doi:10.5040/9780755624355. ISBN 978-1-78673-987-2. Ghose maintained that under the Indian Penal Code only subjects of the Queen or foreigners residing in British India could be guilty of waging war against the Queen. Manipur was an independent sovereign state and..
  2. ^ Arora, Vibha; Kipgen, Ngamjahao (2012). "The Politics of Identifying with and Distancing from Kuki Identity in Manipur". Sociological Bulletin. 61 (3): 429–449. doi:10.1177/0038022920120303. ISSN 0038-0229. JSTOR 26290634. S2CID 157167951. Historically, Manipur was an independent kingdom ruled by Meitei dynasty. The physical boundary of Manipur has been fluctuating with historical changes in political power and the intra state and the inter state boundaries
  3. ^ Htin Aung, U. (1967). A history of Burma. Internet Archive. New York, Columbia University Press. p. 117.
  4. ^ Baruah, S. L. (1983). "THE BURMESE AND THE NORTH EAST (from the middle of 18th century to the Treaty of Yandabo in 1826)". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 44: 609–613. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44139912.
  5. ^ a b KSHETRIMAYUM, JOGENDRO (2009). "Shooting the Sun: A Study of Death and Protest in Manipur". Economic and Political Weekly. 44 (40): 48–54. ISSN 0012-9976. JSTOR 25663656. Loiyamba Shinyen (ls), considered the first writ ten constitution of Manipur (Kabui 1988; Naorem 1988). Dated to 1110 ad, it was written during the reign of Loiyamba or Loiyumba
  6. ^ Lokendra, N. (1 January 1998). The Unquiet Valley: Society, Economy, and Politics of Manipur (1891-1950). Mittal Publications. pp. 35–38. ISBN 978-81-7099-696-5.
  7. ^ "Manipur Merger Agreement, 1949". Satp.org. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  8. ^ "The Constitution (Amendment)". Indiacode.nic.in. Archived from the original on 1 May 2017. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  9. ^ http://indiacode.nic.in/acts-in-pdf/392012.pdf [bare URL PDF]
  10. ^ Gangmuei Kabui, History of Manipur, National Publishing House, Delhi, 1991.
  11. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 2,10,11.
  12. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 73,74.
  13. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 74,92.
  14. ^ a b Hazarika 2017, p. 75,80.
  15. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 153.
  16. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 79,90.
  17. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 86.
  18. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 100,111,112.
  19. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 95,111,112,141,142,153.
  20. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 140.
  21. ^ Post & Burling 2017, p. 232,233.
  22. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 112,113,142,143.
  23. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 58.
  24. ^ a b Hazarika 2017, p. 16.
  25. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 150,151.
  26. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 1, 3.
  27. ^ Hazarika 2017, p. 69,70.
  28. ^ a b Parratt (2005), pp. 2, 13.
  29. ^ Brandt (2017), pp. 122.
  30. ^ Sebastian (2019), pp. 55.
  31. ^ Sebastian (2019), pp. 45–46.
  32. ^ Sebastian (2019), pp. 46.
  33. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 4–6, 13.
  34. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 4.
  35. ^ Sebastian (2019), pp. 57–58.
  36. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 10, 11.
  37. ^ Sebastian (2019), pp. 52–53.
  38. ^ Beemer 2013, pp. 266.
  39. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 11, 17.
  40. ^ Brandt (2017), pp. 128.
  41. ^ Naorem (2015), pp. 219.
  42. ^ Parratt 2005, pp. 23–31.
  43. ^ Parratt 2005, pp. 31–36.
  44. ^ Parratt 2005, pp. 36–40.
  45. ^ Naorem Sanajaoba, Manipur Treaties and Documents-Vol I,1993, New Delhi. Book I: "Twelfth Century Meetei Constitution To Pemberton Report", http://dspace.nehu.ac.in/bitstream/1/9804/1/Manipur%20treaties%20%28N%20Sanajaoba%29.pdf.
  46. ^ K, Manikchand. "The Evolution of Meetei State".
  47. ^ "History Of Medieval Manipur 1". e-pao.net. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  48. ^ Parratt 2005, pp. 40–41.
  49. ^ a b "Hinduism in Manipur Part 1 By Chirom Rajketan". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  50. ^ "Hinduism in Manipur A Political Perspectives By Rinku Khumukcham". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  51. ^ "Hinduism in Manipur Part 2 By Chirom Rajketan". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  52. ^ "Puya Meithaba The Burning of Meitei Sacred Scripture By Madhu Chandra". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  53. ^ "seven years devastation". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  54. ^ "A Brief Note On Chahi Taret Khuntakpa". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  55. ^ "Glorious Exploits of Manipur Levy 1". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  56. ^ "Glorious Exploits of Manipur Levy 2". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  57. ^ "Glorious Exploits of Manipur Levy 3". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  58. ^ "Glorious Exploits of Manipur Levy 4". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  59. ^ "Historic Anglo Manipuri war of 1891 1". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  60. ^ "Historic Anglo Manipuri war of 1891 2". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  61. ^ "A brief note on Anglo Manipuri War". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  62. ^ "Historical significance of Anglo Manipur War of 1891 By Vividraj Achom". e-pao.net. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  63. ^ "Japanese bombing of Imphal Part 1". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  64. ^ "Japanese bombing of Imphal Part 2". e-pao.net. Retrieved 18 February 2023.

Bibliography

edit

Further reading

edit

Early Modern

edit

Late Modern

edit
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Manipur&oldid=1255087348#Early_Modern"