Wikipedia

Middle East Media Research Institute

(Redirected from Middle East Media and Research Institute)

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), officially the Middle East Media and Research Institute,[1] is an American non-profit press monitoring organization co-founded by Israeli ex-intelligence officer Yigal Carmon and Israeli-American political scientist Meyrav Wurmser in 1997.

Middle East Media and Research Institute
AbbreviationMEMRI
FoundedDecember 1, 1997; 26 years ago (1997-12-01)[1]
Type501(c)(3)[2]
52-2068483[2]
Legal statusThink tank (non-profit)
FocusMedia monitoring
HeadquartersWashington, D.C., United States
Region
Worldwide
ProductMedia research, English-language translation, original analysis
Official language
English
President
Yigal Carmon
Vice president
Alberto M. Fernandez
Executive director
Steven Stalinsky
Senior analyst
Nimrod Raphaeli
Oliver Revell[3]
Michael Mukasey[3]
Reid Morden[3]
Robert R. Reilly[3]
Jeffrey Kaufman[3]
Steven Emerson[3]
Revenue (2018)
$6,292,683[4]
Expenses (2018)$6,247,476[4]
Employees (2017)
20 (United States)
57 (international)[4]
Volunteers (2017)
5[4]
Websitewww.memri.org Edit this at Wikidata

Critics describe MEMRI as a strongly pro-Israel advocacy group that, in spite of describing itself as being "independent" and "non-partisan" in nature,[5][6][7] aims to portray the Arab world and the Muslim world in a negative light by producing and disseminating incomplete or inaccurate translations of the original versions of the media reports that it re-publishes.[8][9] It has also been accused of selectively focusing on the views of Islamic extremists while de-emphasizing or ignoring mainstream opinions.[10]

History

The organization was co-founded by Yigal Carmon, an ex-Aman agent, and Meyrav Wurmser, a political scientist. It was incorporated in Washington, D.C., as the Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc. on December 1, 1997.[1]

Objectives

The organization indirectly gained public prominence as a source of news and analysis about the Muslim world, following the September 11 attacks and the subsequent war on terror by the Bush administration. According to MEMRI, its translations and reports are distributed to "congresspersons, congressional staff, policy makers, journalists, academics, and interested parties". According to Political Research Associates, MEMRI's translated articles and its commentary are routinely cited in national media outlets in the United States, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times, while analyses by MEMRI staff and officers are frequently published by right-wing and neoconservative media outlets such as National Review, Fox News, Commentary, and the Weekly Standard. Political Research Associates writes that both critics and supporters of MEMRI note its increasing influence in shaping perceptions of the Middle East.[11] It has maintained longstanding relations with law enforcement agencies.[12]

Concerning this change in their 'mission statement,' Political Research Associates, which studies the US political right, notes that it occurred three weeks after the September 11 attacks, and considers MEMRI "was previously more forthcoming about its political orientation in its self-description and in staff profiles on its website". Political Research Associates considers that "MEMRI's slogan, 'Bridging the Language Gap Between the Middle East and the West,' does not convey the institute's stridently pro-Israel and anti-Arab political bias." It further notes, that MEMRI's founders, Wurmser and Carmon, "are both hardline pro-Israel ideologues aligned with Israel's Likud party".[11] Carmon, in a public letter to Juan Cole that included a threat with a lawsuit over his comments on MEMRI, stated that he has never been affiliated with Likud. Cole answered that he had not alleged that, but that MEMRI would campaign for Likud goals such as the rejection of the Oslo peace process.[13]

In 2012, Haaretz reported that Israeli intelligence agencies have reduced their monitoring the Palestinian media with MEMRI and Palestinian Media Watch now providing the Israeli government with coverage of "anti-Israel incitement" in social media, blogs and other online sources. The Prime Minister's Bureau has stated that before the government cites information provided by the two sources, the source of the material and its credibility is confirmed.[14]

Projects

MEMRI's work is organized into projects, each with a specific focus. The main subjects the organization addresses are jihad and terrorism; relations between the U.S. and Middle East; pro-democracy and pro-civil rights views; inter-Arab relations; and anti-Semitism.[15]

The Reform Project, according to MEMRI, focuses on monitoring, translating, and amplifying media from Muslim figures and movements with progressive viewpoints in the Arab and Muslim world.[16] The project also aims to provide a platform for those sources to expand their reach. MEMRI has stated that this is the organization's flagship project.[15][17]

The MEMRI Lantos Archives on anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial, a joint project with the Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice launched in 2009, is a repository of translated Arabic and Farsi material on anti-Semitism.[18] The project is sponsored by the U.S. State Department.[19] Through its translations and research, the project aims to document anti-Semitic trends in the Middle East and South Asia. The project provides policymakers with translations and footage of anti-Semitic comments made by media personalities, academics, and government and religious leaders.[20] MEMRI holds an annual Capitol Hill gathering through the project, and publishes an annual report on anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial. The archives were named for Tom Lantos, the only Holocaust survivor to serve in United States Congress.[21]

Arab and Iranian television programming is monitored, translated, and analyzed through the MEMRI TV Monitoring Project. The project's translated video clips are available to the media and general public.[22]

Activity by terrorist and violent extremist organizations is tracked through the Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM).[23] The project disseminates jihadi-associated social media content and propaganda released by various Islamic State media companies.[24][25][26]

The organization's Cyber and Jihad Lab (CJL) tracks cyberterrorism.[27] According to MEMRI, the CJL's goal is to inform and make recommendations to legislators and the business community about the threat of cyberterrorism.[28] Initiatives have included encouraging social media companies to remove terrorist accounts and sought legislation to prevent terrorist entities from using their platforms.[25]

MEMRI's other projects include the Russian Media Studies Project, which translates Russian media and publishes reports analyzing Russian political ideology,[29] the Iran Studies Project,[30] the South Asia Studies Project,[31] and the 9/11 Documentation Project.[32]

Financial aid

MEMRI is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.[2] Despite MEMRI claiming to have a policy of not accepting money from governments, it has accepted grants from the US government, though MEMRI primarily relies on around 250 private donors, including other organizations and foundations.[17]

MediaTransparency, an organization that monitors the financial ties of conservative think tanks to conservative foundations in the United States, reported that for the years 1999 to 2004, MEMRI received $100,000 from The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Inc., $100,000 from The Randolph Foundation, and $5,000 from the John M. Olin Foundation.[33][34]

MEMRI recognized US$6,292,683 of revenue and incurred US$6,247,476 of expenses during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018.[4] Charity Navigator, an organization that evaluates the financial health of America's largest charities, has given MEMRI three stars out of a possible four.[35]

In August 2011, the United States Department of State's Office of International Religious Freedom in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, awarded MEMRI a $200,000 grant.[36]

Reception

The organization's translations are regularly quoted by major international newspapers, and its work has generated strong criticism and praise. Critics have accused MEMRI of producing inaccurate, unreliable translations with undue emphasis and selectivity in translating and disseminating the most extreme views from Arabic and Persian media, which portray the Arab and Muslim world in a negative light, while ignoring moderate views that are often found in the same media outlets. Other critics charge that while MEMRI does sometimes translate pro-US or pro-democracy voices in the regional media, it systematically leaves out intelligent criticism of Western-style democracy, US and Israeli policy and secularism.[6][37][38][39]

MEMRI's work has been criticized on three grounds: that their work is biased; that they choose articles to translate selectively so as to give an unrepresentative view of the media they are reporting on; and that some of their translations are inaccurate.[40] MEMRI has responded to the criticism, stating that their work is not biased; that they in fact choose representative articles from the Arab media that accurately reflect the opinions expressed, and that their translations are highly accurate.[40]

Accusations of pro-Israel bias

Brian Whitaker, then the Middle East editor for The Guardian, wrote in a public email debate with Carmon in 2003, that his problem with MEMRI was that it "poses as a research institute when it's basically a propaganda operation".[40] Earlier, Whitaker had charged that MEMRI's role was to "further the political agenda of Israel." and that MEMRI's website does not mention Carmon's employment for Israeli intelligence, or Meyrav Wurmser's political stance, which he described as an "extreme brand of Zionism".[6] However, Whitaker also wrote that "nobody, so far as I know, disputes the general accuracy of Memri's translations."[6]

Carmon responded to this by stating that his employment history is not a secret and was not political, as he served under opposing administrations of the Israeli government and that perhaps the issue was that he was Israeli: "If your complaint is that I am Israeli, then please say so." Carmon also questioned Whitaker's own biases, wondering if Whitaker is biased in favor of Arabs – as his website on the Middle East is named "Al-Bab" ("The Gateway" in Arabic) – stating: "I wonder how you would judge an editor whose website was called "Ha-Sha-ar" ("The Gateway" in Hebrew)?[40]

In 2006, MEMRI released an interview with Norman Finkelstein on Lebanese Al Jadeed in which he discussed his book The Holocaust Industry which made it appear as if Finkelstein was questioning the death toll of the Holocaust.[41] Finkelstein said in response that MEMRI edited the television interview he gave in order to falsely impute that he was a Holocaust denier. In an interview with the Muslim-American newspaper In Focus in 2007, he said MEMRI uses "the same sort of propaganda techniques as the Nazis" and "take[s] things out of context in order to do personal and political harm to people they don't like".[42]

Selective focus on Islamic extremists

Several critics have accused MEMRI of selectivity. Juan Cole, a professor of Modern Middle East History at the University of Michigan, argues MEMRI has a tendency to "cleverly cherry-pick the vast Arabic press, which serves 300 million people, for the most extreme and objectionable articles and editorials... On more than one occasion I have seen, say, a bigoted Arabic article translated by MEMRI and when I went to the source on the web, found that it was on the same op-ed page with other, moderate articles arguing for tolerance. These latter were not translated."[43] Former head of the CIA's counterintelligence unit, Vincent Cannistraro, said that MEMRI "are selective and act as propagandists for their political point of view, which is the extreme-right of Likud. They simply don't present the whole picture."[44][45] Laila Lalami, writing in The Nation, states that MEMRI "consistently picks the most violent, hateful rubbish it can find, translates it and distributes it in email newsletters to media and members of Congress in Washington."[37] As a result, critics such as UK Labour politician Ken Livingstone state that MEMRI's analyses are distortion.[46][47]

Assaf David of the Truman Institute wrote that MEMRI distorts the Arab world by publishing the writings of extremists while ignoring moderates.[48]

A report by Center for American Progress, titled "Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America" lists MEMRI as promoting Islamophobic propaganda in the USA through supplying selective translations that are relied upon by several organisations "to make the case that Islam is inherently violent and promotes extremism."[49]

MEMRI argues that they are quoting the government-controlled press and not obscure or extremist publications, a fact their critics acknowledge, according to Marc Perelman: "When we quote Al-Ahram in Egypt, it is as if we were quoting The New York Times. We know there are people questioning our work, probably those who have difficulties seeing the truth. But no one can show anything wrong about our translations."[44]

In August 2013, the Islamic Da'wah Centre of South Australia questioned the "reliability, independence and veracity" of MEMRI after it posted what the Islamic Da'wah Centre called a "sensational de-contextualised cut-and-paste video clip ... put together in a suggestive manner" of a sermon by the Sheikh Sharif Hussein on an American website. According to the two-minute video, which was a heavily condensed version of the Sheikh's 36-minute speech delivered in Adelaide on 22 March, Hussein called Australian and American soldiers "Crusader pigs" and stated "O Allah, count the Buddhists and the Hindus one by one. O Allah, count them and kill them to the very last one." According to MEMRI's translation, he also described U.S. President Barack Obama as an "enemy of Allah, you who kiss the shoes and feet of the Jews" and predicted that "The day will come when you are trampled upon by the pure feet of the Muslims."[50] MEMRI's rendition moved Liberal senator Cory Bernardi to write to the Police Commissioner charging that under Australian anti-terrorism laws, the video clip was "hate speech", and requesting that action be taken against Hussein. The South Australian Islamic Society and the Australian Buddhist Councils Federation also condemned Hussein's speech. Widespread calls from the public for the deportation of Hussein and his family followed news reports of the video. A police spokeswoman stated "Police will examine the entire content of the sermon to gain the full context and determine whether any crime has been committed." Hussein himself declined any comment on the contents of the video. However, the Da'wah Centre charged that by omitting the context of Hussein's statements, MEMRI had distorted the actual intent of the speech. While admitting that the Sheikh was emotional and used strong words, the Centre stated that the speech was delivered in relation to rape cases in Iraq, the birth defects due to use of depleted uranium, and the Burmese Buddhist massacre. This, the Centre said, was omitted from the edited MEMRI video.[51][52][53]

Translation accuracy and controversy

See also: Tomorrow's Pioneers § Translation controversy

MEMRI's translations are considered "usually accurate"[54] though occasionally disputed and highly selective in what it chooses to translate and in which context it puts things,[54] as in the case of MEMRI's translation of a 2004 Osama bin Laden video, which MEMRI defended, which it said indicated that any individual US state that did not vote for President George W. Bush "guarantees its own security," implying a threat against those states that did vote for him;[55] outside translators, and the original article that the MEMRI alert claimed to correct, indicated that Bin Laden was threatening nations, not individual US states.[55][40][47][56][57]

Following the 7 July 2005 London bombings, Al Jazeera invited Hani al-Sebai, an Islamist living in Britain, to take part in a discussion on the event. Al-Sibai is listed as a Specially Designated National by the US Treasury Department because of alleged support for al-Qaida.[58] For one segment of the discussion in regard to the victims, MEMRI provided the following translation of al-Sebai's words:

The term "civilians" does not exist in Islamic religious law. Dr Karmi is sitting here, and I am sitting here, and I'm familiar with religious law. There is no such term as "civilians" in the modern Western sense. People are either at war or not.[59]

Al-Sebai subsequently claimed that MEMRI had mistranslated his interview, and that among other errors, he had actually said:

There is no term in Islamic jurisprudence called "civilians". Dr Karmi is here sitting with us, and he's very familiar with the jurisprudence. There are fighters and non-fighters. Islam is against the killing of innocents. The innocent man cannot be killed according to Islam.[46]

By leaving out the condemnation of the "killing of innocents" entirely, Mohammed El Oifi, writing in Le Monde diplomatique, argued that this translation left the implication that civilians (the innocent) are considered a legitimate target.[46] Several British newspapers subsequently used MEMRI's translation to run headlines such as "Islamic radical has praised the suicide bomb attacks on the capital"[60] prompting al-Sebai to demand an apology and take legal action. In his view, MEMRI's translation was also "an incitement to have me arrested by the British authorities".[61]

Halim Barakat described MEMRI as "a propaganda organization dedicated to representing Arabs and Muslims as anti-Semites".[62] Barakat claims an essay he wrote for the Al-Hayat Daily of London titled "The Wild Beast that Zionism Created: Self-Destruction", was mistranslated by MEMRI and retitled as "Jews Have Lost Their Humanity". Barakat further stated "Every time I wrote 'Zionism', MEMRI replaced the word by 'Jew' or 'Judaism'. They want to give the impression that I'm not criticizing Israeli policy, but that what I'm saying is anti-Semitic."[42][45][46] According to Barakat, he was subject to widespread condemnation from faculty and his office was "flooded with hatemail".[63] Fellow Georgetown faculty member Aviel Roshwald accused Barakat in an article he published of promoting a "demonization of Israel and of Jews".[64] Supported by Georgetown colleagues, Barakat denied the claim,[65] which Roshwald had based on MEMRI's translation of Barakat's essay.[64]

In 2007, CNN correspondent Atika Shubert and Arabic translators accused MEMRI of mistranslating portions of a Palestinian children's television program:

Media watchdog MEMRI translates one caller as saying – quote – 'We will annihilate the Jews'," said Shubert. "But, according to several Arabic speakers used by CNN, the caller actually says 'The Jews are killing us.'[66][67]

Naomi Sakr, a professor of Media Policy at the University of Westminster has charged that specific MEMRI mistranslations, occurring during times of international tension, have generated hostility towards Arab journalists.[68]

In an email debate with Carmon, Whitaker asked about MEMRI's November 2000 translation of an interview given by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem to Al-Ahram al-Arabi. One question asked by the interviewer was: "How do you deal with the Jews who are besieging al-Aqsa and are scattered around it?" which was translated as: "How do you feel about the Jews?" MEMRI cut out the first part of the reply and combined it with the answer to the next question, which, Whitaker claimed, made "Arabs look more anti-Semitic than they are". Carmon admitted this was an error in translation but defended combining the two replies, as both questions referred to the same subject. Carmon rejected other claims of distortion by Whitaker, saying: "it is perhaps reassuring that you had to go back so far to find a mistake ... You accused us of distortion by omission but when asked to provide examples of trends and views we have missed, you have failed to answer." Carmon also accused Whitaker of "using insults rather than evidence" in his criticism of MEMRI.[40]

In 2008, The New York Times wrote that "no one disputes their translations."[69]

Response by MEMRI

MEMRI responds to criticism by saying that the media had a tendency to whitewash statements of Arab leaders, and regularly defends its translations as being representative of actual ME viewpoints, even when the translations themselves are disputed: "MEMRI has never claimed to 'represent the view of the Arabic media', but rather to reflect, through our translations, general trends which are widespread and topical."[40]

Positive reception

In 2003 John Lloyd defended MEMRI in the New Statesman:

One beneficial side effect of the focus on the Middle East is that we now have available much more information on the discourse of the Arab world. The most powerful medium for this is (naturally) a Washington-based think-tank, the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), started in 1998 by the former Israeli intelligence officer and Arabist Yigal Carmon. MEMRI aimed to bring the previously largely enclosed and unknown Arab talk about the west to western eyes and ears: it is a sobering experience to read on the internet MEMRI's vast store of translations from many media, and to note how much of what is written is conspiratorial, vicious and unyieldingly hateful. MEMRI and Carmon have been accused of selecting the worst of a diverse media: however, the sheer range of what is available weakens that criticism, as does support for the initiative by Arab liberals.[70]

In a 2005 piece Thomas Friedman, a political opinion columnist for The New York Times, praised MEMRI, and credited MEMRI with helping to "shine a spotlight on hate speech wherever it appears".[71] Friedman has written in The New York Times that "what I respect about Memri is that it translates not only the ugly stuff but the courageous liberal, reformist Arab commentators as well." In addition, he has cited MEMRI's translations in his op-eds.[72]

In 2002 Brit Hume of Fox News said, "These people tell you what's going on in pulpits and in the state-controlled TV. If you have indoctrination, it's important to know about it."[73][verification needed]

Jay Nordlinger, the managing editor of National Review, wrote in 2002:

Wading or clicking through MEMRI's materials can be a depressing act, but it is also illusion-dispelling, and therefore constructive. This one institute is worth a hundred reality-twisting Middle Eastern Studies departments in the U.S. Furthermore, listening to Arabs—reading what they say in their newspapers, hearing what they say on television—is a way of taking them seriously: a way of not condescending to them, of admitting that they have useful things to tell us, one way or the other. Years ago, Solzhenitsyn exhorted, "Live not by lies." We might say, in these new circumstances, "Live not by ignorance about lies, either." Anyone still has the right to avert his eyes, of course. But no one can say that that is not a choice.[17]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc. - Initial File Number: 973914[permanent dead link]". District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
  2. ^ a b c "Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc." Tax Exempt Organization Search. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
  3. ^ a b c d e f "About". MEMRI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2017.
  4. ^ a b c d e "Form 990: Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax". Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc. Internal Revenue Service. June 30, 2018.
  5. ^ Baker 2010, p. 353.
  6. ^ a b c d Whitaker, Brian (August 12, 2002). "Selective Memri". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved October 18, 2023.
  7. ^ Fathi 2010, p. 202: "But what about using MEMRI, what about the various accusations? There is no monolithic answer. As a translation service it is of great value. As a research tool the evaluation is more complex as it demands good background information in order to contextualize the information obtained, due to the organization's lack of transparency and attempt to pose as something different than what they are. The problem is that many of the journalists, politicians and lay persons who use MEMRI cannot and will not do this. And this is where the main objection to MEMRI comes into play. It presents itself as an independent research institute, but it acts as a tool geared toward shaping opinion by "producing an orient"—in the true sense of Edward Said's usage—and through this it has an increasing influence in shaping perceptions of the Middle East. MEMRI has understood that politics today is waged in the media and it fulfills its role as a public relations, lobbying and policy-making instrument with the highest professional standard."
  8. ^ Whitaker, Brian (May 15, 2007). "Arabic under fire". The Guardian. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
  9. ^ Council on American–Islamic Relations (2013). The Inner Core: Islamophobia and its Impact in the United States January 2011-December 2012 (PDF) (Report). Council on American–Islamic Relations. p. 33. JSTOR resrep31106.5. The group has an established reputation for distributing highly selective, distorted, and inaccurate translations of Arabic and Persian media
  10. ^ Fathi 2010, pp. 188–190.
  11. ^ a b "Middle East Media Research Institute". Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies. November 9, 2011. Archived from the original on August 5, 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  12. ^ Baron, Dan (August 17, 2007). "Israeli Web site Debka.com at center of New York 'dirty bomb' tip". Jewish Journal. Archived from the original on September 18, 2008. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  13. ^ Cole, Juan (November 23, 2004). "Intimidation By Israeli Linked". Informed Comment. Archived from the original on May 2, 2015.
  14. ^ Ravid, Barak (January 31, 2022). "Officials: Israel Outsources Monitoring of Palestinian Media After IDF Lapse". Haaretz. Archived from the original on October 5, 2022. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  15. ^ a b Cashman, Greer Fay (April 16, 2009). "Impacting the collective global MEMRI". The Jerusalem Post. 'Reforms in the Muslim and Arab world constitute our flagship project,' he said. 'We are big on reforms. We have helped several reform initiatives, and in 2001 we monitored and distributed dissident voices in the aftermath of the bombing of the World Trade Centre. When these voices were small and weak, we were able to amplify them by publishing them - and we keep doing that without support from any quarter. We even helped reform Web sites to operate.'
  16. ^ Scarborough, Rowan (September 12, 2016). "Group exposing the drumbeat of Islamic State's propaganda machine". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on October 19, 2016. Retrieved October 26, 2016. created its own self-titled "Reform Project" that features videos of Muslims preaching a moderate form of Islam." "'We support and amplify voices of Muslim reformists.'
  17. ^ a b c Nordlinger, Jay (September 14, 2004). "Thanks For The Memri (.Org)". The National Review. Archived from the original on December 19, 2021. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
  18. ^ Greenberg, Richard (April 30, 2009). "Denying the deniers". Washington Jewish Week. The translated article was the first document officially released by MEMRI's Lantos Archive on Anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial"; "The formal dedication of the renamed archive was held a week ago Wednesday in the U.S. Capitol."; "The archive project brings together MEMRI and the Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice"; "The archive that now bears the Lantos name is the world's largest repository of translated Arabic and Farsi material on anti-Semitism from the past decade
  19. ^ Ruth Ellen Gruber (August 15, 2011). "State Dept. gives $200,000 grants to MEMRI, Centropa". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Archived from the original on February 11, 2017. Retrieved October 25, 2016. The U.S. State Department awarded $200,000 grants each to the Middle East Media Research Institute, or MEMRI, and the Central Europe Center for Research and Documentation, known as Centropa."; "MEMRI, a Washington-based group that translates and researches anti-Semitic trends in the Middle East and South Asia, was awarded the grant to document and translate anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial in the Middle East.
  20. ^ van der Vaart, Marieke (July 27, 2011). "Fight against Holocaust denial 'far from over'". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on August 4, 2017. Retrieved September 20, 2016. Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen was one of several human rights advocates who reviewed anti-Semitism in the Middle East and in Sudan at a Capitol briefing organized by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) and the Lantos Anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial Archives"; "MEMRI, which translates Middle East news reports, released a 15-minute video archive of TV programming at the briefing that showed anti-Semitic comments from television personalities, government officials, academics and clerics in the past year.
  21. ^ Solomon, Ariel Ben (April 16, 2015). "At MEMRI's Washington event, McCain says world seeing resurgence in anti-Semitism". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on December 23, 2016. Retrieved August 29, 2016. The sixth annual Lantos Anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial Archives Commemoration was sponsored by Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner. The late Tom Lantos, born in Hungary, was a 14-term member of the House of Representatives from California and the only Holocaust survivor to serve in congress."; "MEMRI also presented its annual report on anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial in the Arab and Muslim world
  22. ^ Lau, Mariam (April 23, 2005). "Ein Fenster zum Nahen Osten" [A window on the Middle East]. Die Welt (in German). Archived from the original on February 11, 2017. Retrieved October 26, 2016. Memri also has an 'Arab TV Monitoring Project.' It is accessible - for television journalists even in broadcastable quality - via www.memritv.org, and shows stunning examples of discourse in the Arabic world in the translated sound bites.
  23. ^ Kimery, Anthony (September 10, 2014). "Apparent New Al Qaeda-Linked Magazine Is Being Published". Homeland Security Today. Retrieved August 29, 2016. The publication was disclosed by the Middle East Media Research Institute's (MEMRI) Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor, which scrutinizes Islamist terrorism and violent extremism worldwide, with special focus on activity within and emanating from the Arab world, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran.[dead link]
  24. ^ Ungerleider, Neal (May 14, 2013). "Virtual Jihad: Chechnya's Instagram Insurgency". Fast Company. Archived from the original on October 1, 2016. Retrieved October 26, 2016. One of the only studies to date, Online Jihadis Embrace Instagram, was published in March by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)."; "the report primarily studied Arabic-language propaganda on Instagram along with English-language captions aimed at the outside world. Although the bulk of the content in MEMRI's report came from Syria and Iraq, photographs of dead Chechen fighters were also included.
  25. ^ a b Amanda Vincinanzo (October 2014). "Countering Cyber Jihad: A Look inside the Middle East Media Research Institute's Cyber Jihad Lab". Homeland Security Today Magazine. The Cyber Jihad Lab has worked to advance legislature to hold American social media companies responsible for failing to remove accounts associated with designated terrorist organizations. MEMRI has also issued reports on American companies who host jihadi websites. The Cyber Jihad Lab also offers companies, as well as members of government agencies and the military, the ability to contact MEMRI with questions or for help translating through MEMRI's Assisting America program.
  26. ^ Chang, Andrea; Dave, Paresh (August 20, 2014). "Social networks crack down on terror posts". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on August 17, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2016. The images and videos get posted to social media websites and then are immediately saved on Internet Archive, a nonprofit digital library.
  27. ^ Iqbal, Myra (June 11, 2015). "The Islamic State Casts a Shadow in Pakistan". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on May 13, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  28. ^ Solomon, Ariel Ben (December 12, 2014). "US Tech Firms urged to help combat cyber jihad". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on April 12, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2016. 'One of the missions of MEMRI's new Cyber Jihad Lab is to explore ways to challenge cyber jihad, including by working and assisting both Western government agencies and the tech community to come up with proper strategies to do this,' he said.
  29. ^ Babbin, Jed (August 25, 2016). "A New Window Into Russia". The American Spectator. Archived from the original on February 11, 2017. Retrieved August 30, 2016. Now, our friends at MEMRI have opened another window, this time on Vladimir Putin's Russia through MEMRI's 'Russian Media Studies Project.' Like MEMRI's studies of Middle Eastern media, MEMRI-Russia provides a lot more than propaganda published at home to the Russian people. It gives considerable insight into what Russian leaders are arguing to each other and to the Russian oligarchy"; "Which brings us to a report by MEMRI-Russia entitled "Understanding Russian Political Ideology and Vision.
  30. ^ Verten, Dan (August 23, 2013). "Global Growing Concern About Iran's Offensive Cyber Capabilities". Homeland Security Today. Retrieved February 1, 2017. 'We believe this is a real threat because they have institutionalized their offensive cyber efforts,' said Ayelet Savyon, director of MEMRI's Iran Studies Project, in an interview[permanent dead link]
  31. ^ "Urdu media has radicalised Muslims, feels ex-BBC scribe". The New Indian Express. August 14, 2016. Archived from the original on August 17, 2016. Retrieved August 29, 2016. Speaking at the launch of his book 'Jihadist Threat to India', the author and director of the South Asia Studies Project, the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), US said that Islamism is a methodolgy [sic] and that Jihadism is the weaponised version of Islamism.
  32. ^ "9/11 Documentation Project". memri.org. MEMRI. Archived from the original on February 11, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  33. ^ About Us, Cursor, archived from the original on August 18, 2007, retrieved October 15, 2007
  34. ^ MEMRI Media Transparency Profile, archived from the original on June 14, 2007, retrieved October 7, 2007
  35. ^ Rating – The Middle East Media Research Institute, Charity Navigator, archived from the original on January 25, 2007
  36. ^ "Office of International Religious Freedom Funds Middle East Media Research Institute Project". United States Department of State. Retrieved January 24, 2014.
  37. ^ a b Lalami, Laila (June 19, 2006), "Missionary Position", The Nation, p. 32.
  38. ^ Hudson 2005, p. 130.
  39. ^ Debate (transcript), CNN, archived from the original on August 1, 2004.
  40. ^ a b c d e f g Whitaker, Brian (January 28, 2003). "Email debate: Yigal Carmon and Brian Whitaker". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on July 21, 2015. Retrieved July 19, 2015.
  41. ^ Lasson 2016, p. 325.
  42. ^ a b Lawrence Swaim, "MEMRI is 'propaganda machine' expert says". Archived from the original on June 20, 2007. Retrieved November 9, 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link), InFocus, June 7, 2007
  43. ^ Cole, Juan (November 2, 2004), "Bin Laden's Audio: Threat to States?", Informed Comment (blog), archived from the original on December 8, 2006, retrieved January 8, 2007.
  44. ^ a b Perelman, Marc (December 7, 2001). "No Longer Obscure, Memri Translates the Arab World". The Forward. Archived from the original on December 6, 2001.
  45. ^ a b Curtiss 2007, p. 17.
  46. ^ a b c d "Propaganda that widens the Arab-West divide – Gained in translation". Le Monde Diplomatique. October 2005. Archived from the original on February 13, 2015. See in French (freely available) "Traduction ou trahison? Désinformation à l'israélienne" [Translation or betrayal? Desinformation, Israeli way]. Le Monde Diplomatique. October 2005. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016.
  47. ^ a b "... when it distorts ..." inQaradawi dossier (PDF) (press release), Mayor of London, archived from the original (PDF) on August 16, 2012.
  48. ^ David, Assaf (August 3, 2012). "Selective Memri". Haaretz.
  49. ^ Fear, Inc. The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America (PDF), Center for American Progress, August 2011, archived from the original (PDF) on November 11, 2011, retrieved October 1, 2011.
  50. ^ Australian Sheik Sharif Hussein to Obama: Oh Enemy of Allah, You Will Be Trampled upon by Pure Muslim Feet (transcript) (clip), MEMRI TV, July 3, 2013, archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  51. ^ "SA Police investigating Islamic preacher's call for violence in online video". ABC News. August 23, 2013. Archived from the original on August 31, 2013. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
  52. ^ Cook, Craig (August 25, 2013). "Islamic preacher Sheikh Sharif Hussein's call to kill all Hindus and Buddhists taken 'out of context'". The Advertiser. Archived from the original on August 28, 2013. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
  53. ^ "Official Media Response". Islamic Da'wah Centre of South Australia. August 24, 2013. Archived from the original on August 31, 2013. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
  54. ^ a b Whitaker, Brian (May 15, 2007). "Arabic under fire". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  55. ^ a b Carmon, Yigal (October 31, 2004). "Osama Bin Laden Tape Threatens U.S. States". Middle East Media Research Institute. Archived from the original on October 3, 2007. Retrieved May 21, 2018.
  56. ^ Smith, Ramona (November 2, 2004), "Did Osama send election threat?", Philadelphia Daily News, archived from the original on November 24, 2004.
  57. ^ Whitaker, Brian (Spring 2005), "Arabsats Get the MEMRI Treatment", TBS, vol. 13, archived from the original on October 17, 2015
  58. ^ "Treasury.gov Page Moved". treasury.gov. Archived from the original on October 18, 2015.
  59. ^ "Director of London's Al-Maqreze Centre for Historical Studies Hani Sibai: There are No 'Civilians' in Islamic Law; The Bombing is a Great Victory for Al-Qa'ida, Which 'Rubbed the Noses of the World's 8 Most Powerful Countries in the Mud'", Special Dispatch, no. 932, MEMRI, July 12, 2005, archived from the original on October 8, 2012.
  60. ^ Fielding, Nick; Gadher, Dipesh (July 17, 2005), "London-based radical salutes bombs 'victory'", The Sunday Times[dead link].
  61. ^ al-Sebai, Hani (July 17, 2005), مركز المقريزي للدراسات التاريخية [Rebuttal of the lies and injustices that the Memri website and some of the British media spread about me], Almaqreze, archived from the original on October 2, 2011.
  62. ^ Barakat, Halim, The story of an article, archived from the original on May 5, 2010.
  63. ^ "Middle East Media Research Institute", Institute for Policy Studies, IRC online.
  64. ^ a b Roshwald, Aviel (April 26, 2002), Bigotry, Hate Speech from Scholars Must Be Exposed and Condemned, archived from the original on January 18, 2012.
  65. ^ Al-Mallah, Majd Yaser; Fitzpatrick, Coeli (2008), Twentieth-century Arab writers, Gale Cengage Learning, p. 39, ISBN 978-0-7876-8164-7.
  66. ^ "Politics–US: Pro-Israel Group's Money Trail Veers Hard Right", IPS, October 21, 2009, archived from the original on October 24, 2009{{citation}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link).
  67. ^ Church, Rosemary; Clancy, Jim; Shubert, Atika; Wedeman, Ben; Connery, Neil; Vause, John; Yoon, Eunice; Anderson, Becky; Dougherty, Jill (May 9, 2007), "Recruiting Next Generation of Militants: Mickey Mouse-Like Character Reaches Out to Palestinian Children", Your World Today (transcript), CNN.
  68. ^ Sadr, Naomi (2007). Arab Television Today. I.B. Tauris. pp. 79–80.
  69. ^ Erlanger, Steven (April 1, 2008). "In Gaza, Hamas's Insults to Jews Complicate Peace". The New York Times.
  70. ^ Lloyd, John (February 3, 2003), "Pay any price, bear any burden?", New Statesman, archived from the original on September 27, 2007.
  71. ^ Friedman, Thomas (July 22, 2005). "Giving the Hatemongers No Place to Hide". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 22, 2009. Retrieved March 23, 2009.
  72. ^ Friedman, Thomas (September 18, 2012). "Look in Your Mirror". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 19, 2012. Retrieved September 20, 2012.
  73. ^ "Middle East: lifting a veil on the Arab press". Columbia Journalism Review. EC next. September 1, 2002. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved November 14, 2011.

Bibliography

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East_Media_Research_Institute&oldid=1249361585"