Template talk:Dot chart
(Redirected from Module talk:Dot chart/doc)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by BrandonXLF in topic Dark mode (resolved)
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2020 October 7. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
 | This edit request to Module:Dot chart/testcases has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change content model to wikitext and redirect to Template:Dot chart/testcases. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Pppery: umm, why? Is that page even needed at all (a module that does nothing). — xaosflux Talk 01:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- You'd have to ask BrandonXLF why he created this page. It isn't really needed, but my reasoning for this edit request is that the purpose of Module:Dot chart/testcases is to direct visitors to Template:Dot chart/testcases, a purpose which a redirect is much more effective at fulfilling than a Lua comment. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Declined. I don't think a redirect would be useful — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- You'd have to ask BrandonXLF why he created this page. It isn't really needed, but my reasoning for this edit request is that the purpose of Module:Dot chart/testcases is to direct visitors to Template:Dot chart/testcases, a purpose which a redirect is much more effective at fulfilling than a Lua comment. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Dark mode (resolved)
editOn dark mode the text is very nearly the same color as the background and not readable. The template seems to be used in zero pages since its release 6 years ago. Is it still in development? Hesistant to fix a template if TfD is on the horizon. Courtesy ping to primary author BrandonXLF in case this is no longer watch-listed. Reported here:[1] Rjjiii (talk) 23:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Rjjiii Thanks for the heads up, I've fixed the dark mode text issue. I do plan on improving the template in the future and evaluating its usefulness, but it is ready to be used / released. – BrandonXLF (talk) 19:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)